ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Motion recovery for video content classification
Full text PdfPdf (2.74 MB)
Source ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) archive
Volume 13 ,  Issue 4  (October 1995) table of contents
Special issue on video information retrieval
Pages: 408 - 439  
Year of Publication: 1995
ISSN:1046-8188
Authors
Nevenka Dimitrova  Arizona State Univ., Tempe
Forouzan Golshani  Arizona State Univ., Tempe
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 90,   Citation Count: 20
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/211430.211433
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Like other types of digital information, video sequences must be classified based on the semantics of their contents. A more-precise and completer extraction of semantic information will result in a more-effective classification. The most-discernible difference between still images and moving pictures stems from movements and variations. Thus, to go from the realm of still-image repositories to video databases, we must be able to deal with motion. Particularly, we need the ability to classify objects appearing in a video sequence based on their characteristics and features such as shape or color, as well as their movements. By describing the movements that we derive from the process of motion analysis, we introduce a dual hierarchy consisting of spatial and temporal parts for video sequence representation. This gives us the flexibility to examine arbitrary sequences of frames at various levels of abstraction and to retrieve the associated temporal information (say, object trajectories) in addition to the spatial representation. Our algorithm for motion detection uses the motion compensation component of the MPEG video-encoding scheme and then computes trajectories for objects of interest. The specification of a language for retrieval of video based on the spatial as well as motion characteristics is presented.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
BOBICK, A.F. 1993. Representational frames in video annotation. In Proceedzngs of the 27th Annual Conference on Signals. Systems and Computers. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, Cahf.
 
4
BUCHANAN, M. C. AND ZELLWEGER, P.T. 1993. Automatically generating consistent schedules for multimedia documents. Multzrned~a Syst. J. 1, 2 (Sept.).
 
5
DAVIS, M. 1993. Media streams: An icomc visual language for video annotation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposzum on Wsual Languages (Bergen, Norway). IEEE, New York, 196 202.
 
6
7
 
8
DUDA, R. O. AND HART, P.E. 1973 Pattern Classification and Scene Analys~s. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
 
9
 
10
 
11
GODD^RD, N. 1992. The perception of articulated motion: Recognizing moving light displays. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Rochester, Rochester, N.Y.
 
12
GOLSHANI, F. AND DIMITROVA, N. 1994. Retrieval and delivery of information in multimedia database systems. Inf. Softw Tech. 36, 4 (May), 235 242.
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
17
 
18
HORN, B. K. AND SCHUNCK, B. G. 1981. Determining optical flow. Artzfi Intell. 17, 1-3, 185-203.
 
19
JOHANSSON, G. 1976. Spatio-temporal differentiation and lntegTation in visual motion perception. Psychol. Res. 38, 4, 379 393.
 
20
 
21
22
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
MICHAEL, N. 1994. VEENA--a visual query language. M.S. thesis, Arizona State Univ., Tempe, Ariz.
 
27
 
28
29
30
 
31
RASURE, J., ARGIRO, D., SAUER, T., AND WILLIAMS, C. 1990. Visual language and software development environment for image processing. Int. J. Imaging Syst. Tech. 2, 2, 183-199.
 
32
 
33
 
34
RowE, L. A., BORECZKY, J. S., AND EADS, C.A. 1994. Indexes for user access to large video databases. In Proceedings of SPIE IS and Symposium on Storage and Retmeval for Image and Video Databases (San Jose, Calif.). SPIE.
 
35
 
36
SWANBERG, D., SHU, C.-F., AND JAIN, R. 1993. Knowledge guided parsing in video databases. In Image and Video Processtng Conference; Symposium on Electromc hnagtng: Sczence and Technology. Vol. 1908. IS & T/SPIE, 13-24.
37
38
 
39
WEISS, R. 1994. Content-based access to algebraic video. Tech. Rep., Massachusetts Inst. of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.
 
40
ZttANG, H., GONG, Y., SMOLIAR, S., AND TAN, S.Y. 1994. Automatic parsing of news video. In Proceedings of the Internattonal Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems (Boston, Mass.). IEEE Computer Society Press. Los Alarnltos, Ca}i~, 45-54.

CITED BY  20

Collaborative Colleagues:
Nevenka Dimitrova: colleagues
Forouzan Golshani: colleagues