ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A rejection technique for sampling from T-concave distributions
Full text PdfPdf (836 KB)
Source ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS) archive
Volume 21 ,  Issue 2  (June 1995) table of contents
Pages: 182 - 193  
Year of Publication: 1995
ISSN:0098-3500
Author
Wolfgang Hörmann  Institut fur Statistik, Wien, Austria
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 34,   Citation Count: 17
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/203082.203089
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A rejection algorithm that uses a new method for constructing simple hat functions for a unimodal, bounded density f is introduced called “transformed density rejection.” It is based on the idea of transforming f with a suitable transformation T such that T(f(x)) is concave. f is then called T-concave, and tangents of T(f(x)) in the mode and in a point on the left and right side are used to construct a hat function with a table-mountain shape. It is possible to give conditions for the optimal choice of these points of contact. With T= -1/xxx, the method can be used to construct a universal algorithm that is applicable to a large class of unimodal distributions, including the normal, beta, gamma, and t-distribution.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
AHRENS, J. H. ANn KOHRT, K.D. 1981. Computer methods for sampling from largely arbitrary statistical distributions. Computing 26, 19-31.
 
3
ATKINSON, A.C. 1982. The simulation of generalized inverse gaussian and hyperbolic random variables. SIAM J. Sci. Star. Comput. 3, 502-515.
 
4
CHENG, R. C.H. 1977. The generation of gamma variables with non-integral shape parameter. Appl. Stat. 26, 71-75.
5
 
6
 
7
DEVROYE, L. 1986. Non-Uniform Random Variate Generation. Springer-Verlag, New York.
8
 
9
GILKS, W. R. AND WILD, P. 1992. Adaptive rejection sampling for gibbs sampling. Appl. Stat. 41,337-348.
 
10
HSRMANN, W. 1994. A universal generator for discrete log-concave distributions. Computing 52, 89-96.
 
11
H~RMANN, W. AND DERFLINGER, G. 1990. The ACR method for generating normal random variables. OR Spektrum 12, 181-185.
 
12
JOHNSON, N. L. AND KOTZ, S. 1970. Continuous Univariate Distributwns. Vol. 1. John Wiley, New York.
 
13
JORGENSEN, B. 1982. Statistical Properties of the Generalized Inverse Gaussian Distribution. Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol. 9. Springer, Berlin.
 
14
KACHITVlCHYANUKUL, V. AND SCHMEISER, B.W. 1985. Computer generation of hypergeometric random variates. J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 22, 127-145.
15
 
16
KINDERMAN, A. J. AND MONAHAN, F. J. 1980. New methods for generating student's t and gamma variables. Computing 25, 369-377.
 
17
MARSAGLIA, G. AND TSANG, W.W. 1984. A fast, easily implemented method for sampling from decreasing or symmetric unimodal density functions. SIAM J. Sci. Star. Comput. 5, 349-359.
 
18
SCHMEISER, B. W. AND BABU, A. J.G. 1980. Beta variate generation via exponential majorizing functions. Oper. Res. 28, 917-926.
 
19
SCHMEISER, B. W. AND LAL, R. 1980. Squeeze methods for generating gamma variates. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 75, 679-682.
 
20
 
21
WAKEFIELD, J. C., GELFAND, A. E., AND SMITH, A. F.M. 1991. Efficient generation of random variates via the ratio-of-uniforms method. Stat. Comput. 1, 129-133.
 
22
ZECHNER, H. AND STADLOBER, E. 1993. Generating beta variates via patchwork rejection. Computing 50, 1-18.

CITED BY  17