ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
CUTE: constrained and unconstrained testing environment
Full text PdfPdf (2.20 MB)
Source ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS) archive
Volume 21 ,  Issue 1  (March 1995) table of contents
Pages: 123 - 160  
Year of Publication: 1995
ISSN:0098-3500
Authors
I. Bongartz  IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY
A. R. Conn  IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY
Nick Gould  Rutherford Appleton Lab, Oxfordshire, UK
Ph. L. Toint  Univ. Notre Dame de la Paix, Namur, Belgium
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 15,   Downloads (12 Months): 126,   Citation Count: 50
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/200979.201043
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this article is to discuss the scope and functionality of a versatile environment for testing small- and large-scale nonlinear optimization algorithms. Although many of these facilities were originally produced by the authors in conjunction with the software package LANCELOT, we believe that they will be useful in their own right and should be available to researchers for their development of optimization software. The tools can be obtained by anonymous ftp from a number of sources and may, in many cases, be installed automatically. The scope of a major collection of test problems written in the standard input format (SIF) used by the LANCELOT software package is described. Recognizing that most software was not written with the SIF in mind, we provide tools to assist in building an interface between this input format and other optimization packages. These tools provide a link between the SIF and a number of existing packages, including MINOS and OSL. Additionally, as each problem includes a specific classification that is designed to be useful in identifying particular classes of problems, facilities are provided to build and manage a database of this information. There is a Unix and C shell bias to many of the descriptions in the article, since, for the sake of simplicity, we do not illustrate everything in its fullest generality. We trust that the majority of potential users are sufficiently familiar with Unix that these examples will not lead to undue confusion.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
AVERICK, B. M. AND MOR~, J. J. 1991. The Minpack-2 test problem collection. Tech. Rep.
 
2
ANL/MCS-TM-157, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Ill.
 
3
AVERICK, B. M., CARTER, R. G., AND MoRli, J.J. 1991. The Minpack-2 test problem collection (preliminary version). Tech. Rep. ANL/MCS-TM-150, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Ill.
 
4
5
 
6
BUCKLEY, A.G. 1989. Test functions for unconstrained minimization. Tech. Rep. CS-3, Computing Science Division, Dalhousie Univ., Dalhousie, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
 
7
Bus, J. C.P. 1977. A proposal for the classification and documentation of test problems in the field of nonlinear programming. Tech. Rep., Mathematisch Centrum, Amsterdam.
 
8
CONN, A. R., GOULD, N., AND TOINT, PH. L. 1994. A note on using alternative second-order models for the subproblems arising in barrier function methods for minimization. Numerische Mathematik 68, 1, 17-33.
 
9
 
10
CONN, A. R., GOULD, N. I. M., AND TOINT, PH. L. 1992b. Numerical experiments with the LANCELOT package (Release A) for large-scale nonlinear optimization. Tech. Rep. 92-16, FUNDP, Namur, Belgium. Available via anonymous ftp from thales.math.fundp.ac.be (Internet i.d. 138.48.4.14), in directory pub/reports.
 
11
Cor~N, A. R., GOULD, N. I. M., AND TOINT, PH. L. 1992c. Intensive numerical tests with LANCELOT (Release A): The complete results. Tech. Rep. 92-15, FUNDP, Namur, Belgium. Available via anonymous ftp from thales.math.fundp.ac.be (Internet i.d. 138.48.4.14), in directory pub/reports.
 
12
CONN, A. R., GOULD, N. I. M., AND TOINT, PH. L. 1990. An introduction to the structure of large-scale nonlinear optimization problems and the LANCELOT project. In Computing Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering, R. Glowinski and A. Lichnewsky, Eds. SIAM, Philadelphia, Pa., 42-54.
 
13
DEMBO, R. S. 1984. A primal truncated-Newton algorithm with application to large-scale nonlinear network optimization. Tech. Rep. 72, Yale School of Management, Yale Univ., New Haven, Conn.
 
14
DENNIS, J. E. AND SCHNABEL, R.B. 1983. Numerical Methods for Unconstrained Optimization and Nonlinear Equations. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
 
15
 
16
GAY, D. M. 1985. Electronic mail distribution of linear programming test problems. Math. Program. Soc. COAL Newsl., 13 (Dec.), 10-12.
 
17
GILL, P. E., MURRAY, W., SAUNDERS, M. A., AND WmGHT, M.H. 1986. User's guide for NPSOL (version 4.0): A Fortran package for nonlinear programming. Tech. Rep. SOL86-2, Dept. of Operations Research, Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif.
 
18
GOULD, N. I.M. 1991. An algorithm for large-scale quadratic programming. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 11, 3, 299 324.
 
19
GRIEWANK, A. AND TOINT, PH. L. 1982. On the unconstrained optimization of partially separable functions. In Nonlinear Optimization 1981, M. J. D. Powell, Ed. Academic Press, New York, 301-312.
 
20
GULLIKSSON, M. 1990. Algorithms for nonlinear least squares with applications to orthogonal regression. Ph.D. thesis, Inst. of Information Processing, Univ. of Ume~, Ume~, Sweden.
 
21
HARWELL. 1993. A Catalogue of Subroutines (Release 11). Advanced Computing Dept., Harwell Laboratory, HarwelL U.K.
 
22
 
23
IBM. 1990. Optimization Subroutine L~brary: Guide and Reference. 2nd ed., SC23-0519-1. IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y.
 
24
IBM. 1978. Mathematical programming system extended (MPSX) and generalized upper bounding (GUB). SH20-0968-1, MPSX Standard, IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y.
25
 
26
 
27
MATLAB. 1993. High-Performance Numeric Computation and Vzsualzzatzon Software, Release 4. The MathWorks, Inc., Natick. Mass.
 
28
MoR~. J. J. AND TOP~LDO, G. 1991. On the solution of large quadratic programming problems with bound constraints. SIAM J. Optzm. 1, 1, 93-113.
29
 
30
MURTAGH, B. A. AND SAUNDERS, M.A. 1993. MINOS 5 4 User's Guide. Tech. Rep. SOL 83-20R, Dept. of Operations Research, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
 
31
MURTACH, B. A. AND SAUNDERS, M.A. 1978. Large-scale linearly constrained optimization. Math. Program. 14, 41 72.
 
32
POWELL, M. J. D. 1994. A direct search optimization method that models the objective and constraint functions by linear interpolation. In Advances in Optimization and Numerical Analysis, Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Optimization and Numerical Analysis (Oaxaca, Mexico). Mathematics and its Applications, vol. 275. Kluwer Academic, New York, 51-67.
 
33
POWELL, M. J.D. 1982. Extensions to subroutine VF02. In Systems Modelling' and Optimizatwn. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol. 38. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 529-538.
 
34
 
35
SCHNABEL, R. B. AND CHOW, T.-T. 1991. Tensor methods for unconstrained optimization using second derivatives. SIAM J. Optim. 1, 3, 293-315.
 
36
TOINT, PH. L. 1983. Test problems for partially separable optimization and results for the routine PSPMIN. Tech. Rep. 83/4, Dept. of Mathematics, FUNDP, Namur, Belgium.
 
37

CITED BY  50


REVIEW

"Sven-Ake Gustafson : Reviewer"

The authors describe computer software that can be used for large-scale testing of programs for solving optimization problems with and without constraints. Many of the facilities described were produced in conjunction with the LANC  more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
I. Bongartz: colleagues
A. R. Conn: colleagues
Nick Gould: colleagues
Ph. L. Toint: colleagues