ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Ethical accountability in the cyberspace
Full text PdfPdf (637 KB)
Source Ethics in the Computer Age archive
Proceedings of the conference on Ethics in the computer age table of contents
Galtinburg, Tennessee, United States
Pages: 115 - 118  
Year of Publication: 1994
ISBN:0-89791-644-1
Authors
K. L. Nance  Department of Computer Science, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK
M. Strohmaier  Department of Communication, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK
Sponsors
SIGCAS: ACM Special Interest Group on Computers and Society
Midsoutheastern ACM Chapter : Midsoutheastern ACM Chapter
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 35,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/199544.199598
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Conformance with ethical behavior consists of adherence to the standards of conduct for any given group. When standards are not formalized, there can exist ethical disparity from which many diverse problems can result. These problems are especially evident in the cyberspace. Within the cyberspace, the “given group” is culturally and ethnically diverse. As such, it is difficult to hold the individuals to a nonformalized set of standards. Several important issues need to be addressed in order to balance each individual's dual needs for freedom of expression and protection in the cyberspace. These issues include development of formalized standards, a general protocol for cross-cultural interaction, and ethical accountability.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
T. Albrecht and M. Adelman. "Communicating Social Support," Sage, 1987.
 
3
 
4
A. Gouldner. "The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement," American Sociological Rev/ew, 25, 161-179, 1960.
 
5
W. Gudykunst and S. Ting-Toomey. "Culture and Interpersonal Communication," Sage, 1988.
 
6
E. Hall. "The Dance of Life," Doubleday, 1983.
 
7
M. Harris. "The Rise of Cultural Theory," Crowell, 1968.
 
8
B. Kantrowitz. "Men, Women and Computers," New,week, May 16:48-55, 1994.
 
9
 
10
K. Leung and E. Lind. Procedural justice and Culture: "Effects of Culture, Gender, and Investigator Status on Procedural Preferences," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1134- 1140, 1986.
 
11
D. Levine. "The Flight from Ambiguity," University of Chicago Press, 1985.
 
12
T. Lowi and 13. Ginsburg. "American Govexnment: Freedom and Power," W. W. Norton and Company, 1994.
 
13
Microsoft (R) Encarta, "Ethics," 1994.
 
14
I. Matder, L. Greenberg, and H. Hayashi. "A Comparative Study of Rules of Justice: Japanese versus Americans," Psychologia, 24, 1-8, 1981.
 
15
T. E. Patterson. "The American Democracy," McGraw-Hill. 1994.
 
16
W. StalHngs. "Operating Systems," MacMillan Publishing, Inc., 1992.
 
17
D. Tannen. "Gender Gap in Cyberspace," Newsweek, May 16:52-53, 1994.
 
18
H. Triandis. "Collectivism vs, Individualism: A Reconceptualization of a basic concept in crosscultural psychology,# Personality, Cognition, and Values: Cross.cultural perspectives of childhood and adolescence. Macmillan Publishing, Inc., 1986.


Collaborative Colleagues:
K. L. Nance: colleagues
M. Strohmaier: colleagues