The role of “help networks” in facilitating use of CSCW tools

ABSTRACT

The pattern of CSCW system users helping other using to resolve problems and make more effective use of such tools has been observed in a variety of settings, but little is known about how help patterns develop or their effects. Results from a pre-post study of the implementation of CSCW tools among university faculty, staff and administration indicate that the network of helping relationships is largely disaggregated and generally follows work group alignments rather than technical specialization. A relatively small group of “high providers” is responsible for most help to users, and tends to act as a liaison between central support staff and work group members. These providers are not systematically different from other personnel except in terms of their expertise. Implications of these findings for the development and cultivation of help relationships in support of CSCW are developed.

REFERENCES

• 1: Bannon, L. "Helping Users Help Each Other" in Norman and Draper (Eds.), User Centered System Design, 1986.
• 2: Tora K. Bikson , J. D. Eveland, The interplay of work group structures and computer support, Intellectual teamwork: social and technological foundations of cooperative work, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, 1990
• 3: B ikson, T.K., Gutek, B. and Mankin, D. Implementing Computerized Procedures in Office Settings: Influences and Outcomes Santa Monica CA: The Rand Corporation, R-3077-NSF/IRIS, October 1987.
• 4: Borgatti, S. and Everett, M. UCINET IV Manual. 1992.
• 5: Brief, A. and Motowidlo, S. "Prosocial Organizational Behaviors" Academy of Management Review 11, 1986, pp. 710-725.
• 6: Chakrabarti, A. "The Role of Champion in Product Innovation" California Management Review, 17(2), Winter 1974, pp. 58-62.
• 7: Andrew Clement, Cooperative support for computer work: a social perspective on the empowering of end users, Proceedings of the 1990 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, p.223-236, October 07-10, 1990, Los Angeles, California, United States [doi>10.1145/99332.99357]
• 8: Eisenberg, N. and Miller, P. "The Relation of Empathy to Prosocial and Related Behaviors" Psychological Bulletin, 101,1987, pp. 91-119.{
• 9: Douglas, C. Engelbart, Toward high-performance knowledge workers (Reprint), Computer-supported cooperative work: a book of readings, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, 1988
• 10: Eveland, J.D. "Uses and limitations of communication network analysis in the evaluation of CSCW applications." Presented to the Workshop on Evaluating CSCW Systems, Third European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Milan, Italy. October 1993.
• 11: J. D. Eveland , T. K. Bikson, Work group structures and computer support: a field experiment, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), v.6 n.4, p.354-379, Oct. 1988 [doi>10.1145/58566.58568]
• 12: Farace, R. and Mabee, T. "Communication Network Analysis Methods" in Multivariate Techniques in Human Communication Research 1980, pp. 366-391.
• 13: Freeman, L. "Centrality in Social Networks. I. Conceptual Clarification" Social Networks 1, 1979, pp. 215-2391979.
• 14: Granovetter, M. "The Strength of Weak Ties" American Journal of Sociology 78, 1973, pp. 1360- 1380.
• 15: Irene Greif , Sunil Sarin, Data sharing in group work, Proceedings of the 1986 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, December 03-05, 1986, Austin, Texas [doi>10.1145/637069.637092]
• 16: Bonnie McDaniel Johnson , Ronald E. Rice, Managing organizational innovation: the evolution from word processing to office information systems, Columbia University Press, New York, NY, 1987
• 17: Kling, R. and Scacchi, W. "The Web of Computing: Computer Technology as Social Organization" in Advances in Computers, 21, 1982, pp. 1-90.
• 18: Knoke, D. and Kuklinski, J. Network Analysis Beverly Hills CA: Sage Publications, 1982.
• 19: Robert E. Kraut , Carmen Egido , Jolene Galegher, Patterns of contact and communication in scientific research collaborations, Intellectual teamwork: social and technological foundations of cooperative work, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, 1990
• 20: Denis M.S Lee, Usage patterns and sources of assistance for personal computer users, MIS Quarterly, v.10 n.4, p.313-326, Dec. 1986 [doi>10.2307/249183]
• 21: Wendy E. Mackay, Patterns of sharing customizable software, Proceedings of the 1990 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, p.209-221, October 07-10, 1990, Los Angeles, California, United States [doi>10.1145/99332.99356]
• 22: Marsden, P. "Network data and measurement." Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 1990, pp. 435-463.
• 23: Mowday, R., Porter, L, and Steers, R. Employee- Organization Linkages: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism, and Turnover New York: Academic Press, 1982.
• 24: O'Reilly, C. and Chatman, J. "Organizational Commitment and Psychological Attachment: The Effects of Compliance, identification, and Internalization on Prosocial Behavior" Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 1986, pp. 492-499.
• 25: Organ, D. Organizational Citizenship Behavior Lexington MA: Lexington Books.
• 26: Papa, M. "Communication Network Patterns and Employee Performance with New Technology" Communication Research, 17(3), June 1990, pp.344- 368.
• 27: Ronald E. Rice , Douglas E. Shook, Access to, usage of, and outcomes from an electronic messaging system, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), v.6 n.3, p.255-276, July 1988 [doi>10.1145/45945.214325]
• 28: Rice, R. "Computer-Mediated Communication and Organizational Innovation" Journal of Communication, 37, 1987, pp. 65-94.
• 29: John F. Rockart , Lauren S. Flannery, The management of end user computing, Communications of the ACM, v.26 n.10, p.776-784, Oct. 1983 [doi>10.1145/358413.358429]
• 30: Rogers, E. and Kincaid, D.L. Communication networks: Toward a new paradigm for research. New York: Free Pres s, 1981.
• 31: Stasz, C, Bikson, T.K., Eveland, J.D., and Mittman, B. Information Technology in the U.S. Forest Service Santa Monica CA: The Rand Corporation, R-3908- USDAFS, July 1990.
• 32: Stork, D. and Richards, W. "Nonrespondents in Communication Network Studies" Group and Organization Management. 17(2), June 1992, pp. 193- 209.
• 33: Strassman, P. Information Payoff: The Transformation of Work in the Electronic Age New York: Free Press, 1985.
• 34: Taylor, J. Performance by Design 1993.
• 35: Tornatzky, L. and Fleischer, M. The Processes of Technological Innovation. Lexington: Lexington Books, 1990.
• 36: Shoshana Zuboff, In the age of the smart machine: the future of work and power, Basic Books, Inc., New York, NY, 1988

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
          Subjects: Training, help, and documentation

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)

General Terms:
Measurement, Theory