Digital library design for organizational usability

ABSTRACT

During the last decade, software designers have made progress in improving the usability of software products, such as word processors, by focusing on the design of interfaces. Less attention has been given to usability issues that go beyond the interface in the design of multi-user systems, such as a digital library (DL).In this paper, we discuss two aspects of DL usability-interface and organizational. While the Human-Computer-Interaction (HCI) research community has helped pioneer design principles to improve interface usability, organizational usability is less well understood. In fact, HCI researchers often treat the term "DL usability" as synonymous with a DL's interface usability. "Design for organizational usability" is a new term that refers to the design of computer-based systems so that they are effectively integrated into the work practices of organizations. Issues of organizational design have been identified and faced by researchers and practitioners in neighboring fields, such as Information Systems. DL developers need to consider "design for organizational usability" issues during DL system design.Anthropologists have successfully used the concept of "cultural models" to understand the cultural constructs through which people view their worlds. Computer systems development communities, including the DL design community, usually have some consensus (cultural models) about the character of systems usability in their development process---how people do and should use computer systems, and what roles different users should play in the design of new systems. We discuss five typical models of computer systems design. These models become cultural models when they are taken for granted within a professional community as THE (natural) way to design all systems. A new model that incorporates "design for organizational usability" principles into system design is proposed. We believe that this model has the strongest chance of producing DL systems that diverse people can use effectively.

REFERENCES

• 1: [Bo86] Borgman, Christine L. Why Are Online Catalogs Hard to Use? Lessons Learned from Information-Retrieval Studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 37(6)(Nov):387-400.
• 2: Christine V. Bullen , John L. Bennett, Groupware in practice: an interpretation of work experiences, Computerization and controversy: value conflicts and social choices, Academic Press Professional, Inc., San Diego, CA, 1991
• 3: [Cu83] Culnan, M. 1983. "Chauffeured Versus End User Access to Commercial Databases: The Effects of Task and Individual Differences." MIS Quarterly 7, 55-67.
• 4: [Da92] D'Andrade, R. G. and Strauss, C. (1992), eds. Human Motives and Cultural Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• 5: Dennis E. Egan , Michael E. Lesk , R. Daniel Ketchum , Carol C. Lochbaum , Joel R. Remde , Michael Littman , Thomas K. Landauer, Hypertext for the electronic library?: CORE sample results, Proceedings of the third annual ACM conference on Hypertext, p.299-312, December 15-18, 1991, San Antonio, Texas, United States [doi>10.1145/122974.123002]
• 6: [Fo92] Forsythe, D. (1992). Blaming the user in medical informatics: the cultural nature of scientific practice. Knowledge and Society: The Anthropology of Science and Technology 9, 95-111.
• 7: [Fo93] Forsythe, D. (1993). The construction of work in artificial intelligence. Science, Technology, & Human Values 18, 4(Autumn), 460-479.
• 8: [Fo93] Fox, E. A. (1993). Source Book on Digital Libraries. Version 1.0, December 6, 1993. Prepared for and Sponsored by the National Science Foundation. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University.
• 9: [Ge92] Geertz, C. (1992). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture, in The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books, pp. 3-30.
• 10: Richard Smith , Mark Gibbs, Navigating the Internet, Sams, Indianapolis, IN, 1993
• 11: John D. Gould , Stephen J. Boies , Clayton Lewis, Making usable, useful, productivity-enhancing computer applications, Communications of the ACM, v.34 n.1, p.74-85, Jan. 1991 [doi>10.1145/99977.99993]
• 12: R. Kling, Defining the boundaries of computing across complex organizations, Critical issues in information systems research, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1987
• 13: Rob Kling, Behind the terminal: the critical role of computing infrastructure in effective information systems development and use, Challenges and strategies for research in systems development, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1992
• 14: [Le93] Lesk, M., Fox, E., and McGill, M. (1993). A National Electronic Science, Engineering, and Technology Library. In Source Book on Digital Libraries. Fox, E. A., ed. Washington, D. C.: National Science Foundation. pp. 4-24.
• 15: [Ma93] Markus, M. L. and Keil, M. (1993) If We Build It, They Will Come: Designing Information Systems That Users Want To Use. Technical Report, The Claremont Graduate School, Claremont, CA.
• 16: Perry L. Miller, Expert Critiquing Systems, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus, NJ, 1986
• 17: [Qu87] Quinn, N. and Holland, D. (1987). Introduction. In Cultural Models in Language and Thought. Holland, D. and Quinn, N., eds. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 3-40.
• 18: Jakob Nielsen, Usability Engineering, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, 1993
• 19: Marc Rettig, Interface design when you don't know how, Communications of the ACM, v.35 n.1, p.29-34, Jan. 1992 [doi>10.1145/129617.129626]
• 20: [Sa91] Saetnan, Ann Rudinow. (1991). Rigid politics and technological flexibility: The anatomy of a failed hospital innovation. Science, Technology, & Human Values 16(4):419-447.
• 21: [Sh76] Shortliffe, Edward Hance. Computer-based medical consultations, MYCIN. New York: Elsevier, c 1976.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.3 INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)

General Terms:
Design, Documentation, Human Factors, Management