ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
How computer graphing programs change the graph design process: results of research on the fill pattern feature
Full text PdfPdf (1.51 MB)
Source ACM SIGDOC Asterisk Journal of Computer Documentation archive
Volume 18 ,  Issue 4  (November 1994) table of contents
Pages: 4 - 20  
Year of Publication: 1994
ISSN:0731-1001
Author
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 53,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/192433.192438
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Graphing experts often critique the fill patterns which appear in many computer-generated graphs and charts because they can distract from and even distort the information. One of the reasons these fill patterns are so problematic is that they are automatically inserted into any plot a user chooses. In this paper I present both a summary of the advantages and disadvantages of fill patterns and the results of research which compares the ways in which both computer designers and paper-and-pencil designers fill the enclosed areas of their graphs and charts. Results show that automatically placed fill patterns exert strong behavioral influences on computer designers and result in decisions that might be different than if they were using paper and pencil.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Arnheim, R. (1969) Visual Thinking. Berkeley: University of California Press.
 
2
Baldwin, L. (September 1984) Color Considerations: Understanding and Choosing Colors for Computer Graphic Systems. Byte, pp. 227--245.
 
3
Barton, B. F. and M. S. Barton (1990) Postmodernism and the Relation of World and Image in Professional Discourse. The Technical Writing Teacher. 17:3, Fall, pp. 256--271.
 
4
Barton, B. F. and M. S. Barton (1987) Simplicity in Visual Representation: A Semiotic Approach. Iowa State Journal of Business and Technical Communication. 1:1, January, pp. 9--26.
 
5
 
6
Casali, J. G. and K. B. Gaylin (1988) Selected Graph Design Variables in Four Interpretation Tasks: A Microcomputer-Based Pilot Study. Behavior and Information Technology, 7:1, pp. 31--49.
 
7
 
8
Cleveland, W. S. and Robert McGill (1983) A Color-Caused Optical Illusion on a Statistical Graph. The American Statistician, 37:1, pp. 101--105.
 
9
Cleveland, W. S. and Robert McGill (1985) Graphical Perception and Graphical Methods for Analyzing Scientific Data. Science, 229, pp. 828--833.
 
10
Cochran, J. K., S. Albrecht and Y. Green (1989) Guidelines for Evaluating Graphical Designs: A Framework Based on Human Perceptual Skills. Technical Communication, First Quarter, pp. 25--32.
 
11
Dondis, D. A. (1973) A Primer of Visual Literacy. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
 
12
Dragga, S. and Gong, G. (1989) Editing: The Design of Rhetoric. Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing Company.
 
13
Foster, D. L. (1990) "Top of the Charts." Macworld (July)LEE
 
14
Holmes, N. (1991) Designer's Guide to Creating Charts and Diagrams. New York: Watson-Guptill Publications.
 
15
Jackson, D., B. J. Edwards and C. F. Gerger (1990) Teaching and Learning about Graphing Through Computer-Assisted Problem Solving: Issues in the Design and Interpretation of Graphs, The Design and Use of Educational Software, and Classroom Research Methodology. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Atlanta, April 9, 1990.
 
16
Kosslyn, S. M. (1994) Elements of Graph Design. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
 
17
Laseau, P. (1980) Graphic Thinking for Architects and Designers. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
 
18
Monmonier, M. (1993) Mapping It Out: Expository Cartography for the Humanities and Social Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
 
19
Schenk, P. (1991) The Role of Drawing in the Graphic Design Process. Design Studies (July 3) 1991, 168--181.
 
20
Snell, J. (1994) Letters. Macuser 10:6 (June), p. 18.
 
21
Tannas, Jr., L. E. (1992) Color in Electronic Displays. Physics Today, 45:1, 52.
 
22
 
23
 
24
Ullman, D. G., Stephen Wood, et al. (1990). The Importance of Drawing in the Mechanical Design Process. Computing and Graphics, 14:2, 263--274.
 
25
 
26
Wheildon, C. (1986) Communicating or Just Making Pretty Shapes: A Study of the Validity -- or Otherwise -- of Some Elements of Typographic Design. North Sydney, N.S.W., Australia: News paper Advertising Bureau of Australia, Ltd.