| Towards a dynamic strategy for computer-aided visual placement |
| Full text |
Pdf
(913 KB)
|
| Source
|
AVI
archive
Proceedings of the workshop on Advanced visual interfaces
table of contents
Bari, Italy
Pages: 78 - 87
Year of Publication: 1994
ISBN:0-89791-733-2
|
|
Authors
|
|
François Bodart
|
Facultés Universitaires Notre-Dame de la Paix, Institut d'Informatique, rue Grandgagnage, 21, B-5000 NAMUR (Belgium)
|
|
Anne-Marie Hennebert
|
Facultés Universitaires Notre-Dame de la Paix, Institut d'Informatique, rue Grandgagnage, 21, B-5000 NAMUR (Belgium)
|
|
Jean-Marie Leheureux
|
Facultés Universitaires Notre-Dame de la Paix, Institut d'Informatique, rue Grandgagnage, 21, B-5000 NAMUR (Belgium)
|
|
Jean Vanderdonckt
|
Facultés Universitaires Notre-Dame de la Paix, Institut d'Informatique, rue Grandgagnage, 21, B-5000 NAMUR (Belgium)
|
|
| Sponsor |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3, Downloads (12 Months): 18, Citation Count: 6
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
This study is devoted to the layout problem in the TRIDENT project (Tools foR an Interactive Development ENvironmenT), which is dedicated to highly interactive business-oriented applications. In this project, the placement problem consists of a computer-aided visual placement of interaction objects (IO) included in a more composite IO called Presentation Unit (PU). Two strategies for placing IO within a PU are characterised and investigated: a static two-column based strategy and a dynamic right/bottom strategy. Each strategy decomposes the placement into three partially overlapping dimensions: localisation, dimensioning, and arrangement. A set of simple mathematical relationships is introduced to rate the quality of visual principles gained with the result of each strategy within the three dimensions. This rating shows that the lack of flexibility should lead us more towards a dynamic strategy for computer-aided visual placement.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Bodart, F. and Vandcrdonckt, J. (1994). Guide ergonomiquc de la presentation dcs applications hautemcnt interactivcs. Namur: Presses Universitaires dc Namur.
|
| |
2
|
|
 |
3
|
Dennis J. M. J. de Baar , James D. Foley , Kevin E. Mullet, Coupling application design and user interface design, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.259-266, May 03-07, 1992, Monterey, California, United States
[doi> 10.1145/142750.142806]
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
Hurlburt, A. (1978). Layout: The Design of the Printed Page, New York: Watson-Guptill Publishing.
|
 |
7
|
|
 |
8
|
|
 |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
|
 |
11
|
|
 |
12
|
|
INDEX TERMS
Primary Classification:
H.
Information Systems
H.5
INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
H.5.2
User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
Subjects:
Theory and methods
Additional Classification:
G.
Mathematics of Computing
G.1
NUMERICAL ANALYSIS
H.
Information Systems
H.5
INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
H.5.2
User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
Subjects:
Interaction styles (e.g., commands, menus, forms, direct manipulation)
General Terms:
Algorithms,
Design,
Theory
Keywords:
dynamic strategy,
grid,
interaction objects,
layouts,
presentation unit,
static strategy,
visual interaction,
visual interface design and management,
visual placement,
visual techniques
|