ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Free-form shape design using triangulated surfaces
Full text PdfPdf (1.40 MB),  PsPs (11.44 MB)
Source International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques archive
Proceedings of the 21st annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques table of contents
Pages: 247 - 256  
Year of Publication: 1994
ISBN:0-89791-667-0
Authors
William Welch  School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Andrew Witkin  School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Sponsor
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 20,   Downloads (12 Months): 115,   Citation Count: 73
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/192161.192216
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We present an approach to modeling with truly mutable yet completely controllable free-form surfaces of arbitrary topology. Surfaces may be pinned down at points and along curves, cut up and smoothly welded back together, and faired and reshaped in the large. This style of control is formulated as a constrained shape optimization, with minimization of squared principal curvatures yielding graceful shapes that are free of the parameterization worries accompanying many patch-based approaches. Triangulated point sets are used to approximate these smooth variational surfaces, bridging the gap between patch-based and particle-based representations. Automatic refinement, mesh smoothing, and re-triangulation maintain a good computational mesh as the surface shape evolves, and give sample points and surface features much of the freedom to slide around in the surface that oriented particles enjoy. The resulting surface triangulations are constructed and maintained in real time.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Timothy Barth. Higher order solution of the euler equations on unstructured grids using quadratic reconstruction. In 28th Aerospace Sciences Meeting. AIAA-90-0013, 1990.
 
2
Marshall Bern and David Eppstein. Mesh generation and opti-mal triangulation. Technical Report CSL-92-1, XEROX Palo Alto Research Center, March 1992.
 
3
D.L. Bonner, M.J. Jakiela, M. Watanabe, and N. Kishi. Pseu-doedge: nonintersected parametric quilt modeling of multiply connected objects. Computer Aided Design, 25(7):438-452, July 1993.
4
5
6
 
7
R. Courant and D. Hilbert. Methods of Mathematical Physics, volume volume I. Wiley, 1937.
 
8
M. Eppstein. On the influence of parameterization in paramet-ric interpolation. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 13:261-268, 1976.
 
9
10
 
11
D. A. Field. Laplacian smoothing and delaunay triangulations. Comm. Appl. Numer. Methods, 4:709-712, 1984.
 
12
G. Forsythe and W. Wasow. Finite Difference Methods for Partial Differential Equations, chapter 19, pages 179-182. John Wiley and Sons, 1960.
 
13
Richard Franke and Gregory Nielson. Scattered data inter-polation and applications: a tutorial and survey. In Hans Ha-gen and Dieter Roller, editors, Geometric Modeling. Springer-Verlag, 1991.
 
14
Gene Golub and Charles Van Loan. Matrix Computations. Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989.
 
15
Victor Guillemin and Alan Pollack. Differential Topology. Prentice-Hall, 1974.
16
 
17
 
18
Michael Kallay. Constrained optimization in surface design. In Modeling in Computer Graphics. Springer Verlag, 1993.
 
19
Michael Kass, Andrew Witkin, and Dimetri Terzopoulos. Snakes: Active contour models. International Journal Com-puter Vision, 1(4), 1987.
 
20
 
21
Steve Mann, Charles Loop, Michael Lounsbery, D. Meyers, J. Painter, Tony Derose, and K. Sloan. A survey of parametric scattered data fitting using triangular interpolants. In Curve and Surface Modeling. SIAM.
22
 
23
 
24
Gregory Nielson. A transfinite, visually continuous, triangu-lar interpolant. In Gerald Farin, editor, Geometric Modelling, pages 235-246. SIAM, 1987.
 
25
Barrett O'Neill. Elementary Differential Geometry. Academic Press, 1966.
 
26
J~ org Peters. Smooth interpolation of a mesh of curves. Con-structive Approximation, 7:221-246, 1991.
27
28
 
29
M. M. Rai and D. A. Anderson. Application of adaptive grids to fluid-flow problems with asymptotic solutions. AIAA J., 20:496-502, 1982.
 
30
D.G. Schweikert. An interpolation curve using a spline in ten-sion. Journal of Math and Phys., 45:312-317, 1966.
31
 
32
Michael Spivak. A Comprehensive Introduction to Differential Geometry. Publish or Perish, Inc., 1979.
 
33
Gilbert Strang. Introduction to Applied Mathematics. Wellesley-Cambridge Press, 1986.
34
 
35
D. Terzopoulos. Multi-level reconstruction of visual surfaces. MIT Artificial Intelligence Memo Number 671, April 1981.
 
36
 
37
Joe F. Thompson. A survey of dynamically-adaptive grids in the numerical solution of partial differential equations. Ap-plied Numerical Mathematics, 1:3-27, 1985.
38
39
 
40
William Welch. Free-Form shape design using triangulated surfaces. PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, (in prepa-ration) 1994.
41
42

CITED BY  73

Collaborative Colleagues:
William Welch: colleagues
Andrew Witkin: colleagues