Development and evaluation of a taxonomical model of behavioral representation techniques

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Development and evaluation of a taxonomical model of behavioral representation techniques

Full text

Pdf (757 KB)

Source

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: celebrating interdependence table of contents

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Pages: 159 - 165

Year of Publication: 1994

ISBN:0-89791-650-6

Authors

J. D. Chase	Department of Computer Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg VA
Robert S. Schulman	Department of Statistics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg VA
H. Rex Hartson	Department of Computer Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg VA
Deborah Hix	Department of Computer Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg VA

Sponsors

SIGCAPH: ACM SIGCAPH Computers and the Physically Handicapped
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
SIGGROUP: ACM Special Interest Group on Supporting Group Work
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 10, Downloads (12 Months): 22, Citation Count: 0

Additional Information:

references index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/191666.191730 What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	John D. Gould , Clayton Lewis, Designing for usability: key principles and what designers think, Communications of the ACM, v.28 n.3, p.300-311, March 1985 [doi>10.1145/3166.3170]
	2	H. R. Hartson , D. Hix, Toward empirically derived methodologies and tools for human-computer interface development, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, v.31 n.4, p.477-494, Oct. 1989 [doi>10.1016/0020-7373(89)90005-9]
	3	Mary Beth Rosson , Susanne Maass , Wendy A. Kellogg, Designing for designers: an analysis of design practice in the real world, Proceedings of the SIGCHI/GI conference on Human factors in computing systems and graphics interface, p.137-142, April 05-09, 1987, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
	4	Deborah Hix , H. Rex Hartson, Developing user interfaces: ensuring usability through product & process, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1993
	5	H. Rex Hartson , Antonio C. Siochi , D. Hix, The UAN: a user-oriented representation for direct manipulation interface designs, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), v.8 n.3, p.181-203, July 1990 [doi>10.1145/98188.98191]
	6	Stuart K. Card , Allen Newell , Thomas P. Moran, The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, 1983
	7	T.P. Moran, The Command Language Grammar: A Representation for the User Interface of Interactive Computer Systems, Int. J. Man-Machine Studies 15, 3-51 (1981).
	8	Stuart K. Card , Thomas P. Moran , Allen Newell, The keystroke-level model for user performance time with interactive systems, Communications of the ACM, v.23 n.7, p.396-410, July 1980 [doi>10.1145/358886.358895]
	9	S.J. Payne, T. R. G. Green, Task-Action Grammars: A Model of the Mental Representation of Task Languages, Human-Computer Interaction 2, 03-133 (1986).
	10	P. Reisner, Formal Grammar and Human Factors Design of an Interactive Graphics System, IEEE Trans. Soft. Eng. SE-7, 229-240 (1981).
	11	D. Kieras, P. G. Poison, An Approach to the Formal Analysis of User Complexity, Int. J. Man-Machine Studies 22, 365-394 (1985).
	12	John M. Carroll , Wendy A. Kellogg , Mary Beth Rosson, The task-artifact cycle, Designing interaction: psychology at the human-computer interface, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 1991
	13	Tony Simon, Analysing the scope of cognitive models in human-computer interaction: a trade-off approach, Proceedings of the Fourth Conference of the British Computer Society on People and computers IV, p.79-93, October 1988, Univ. of Manchester, United Kingdom
	14	Teresa Worthington Bleser, An input device model of interactive systems design, George Washington University, Washington, DC, 1991
	15	J. Mackinlay, S. K. Card, G. G. Robertson, A Semantic Analysis of the Design Space of Input Devices, Human Computer Interaction 5, (1990).
	16	A. Kaplan, Conduct of Inquiry : Methodology For Behavioral Science (Chandler Pub. Co., 1964).
	17	T.P. Moran, in Methodology of Interaction Guedj et al, Ed. (North-Holland Publishing Co., 1980) 293- 301.
	18	Robert J. K. Jacob, Using formal specifications in the design of a human-computer interface, Proceedings of the 1982 conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.315-321, March 15-17, 1982, Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States [doi>10.1145/800049.801802]
	19	J. Cohen, A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales, Educational and Psychological Measurement 20, 37-46 (1960).
	20	J.L. Fleiss, Measuring Nominal Scale Agreement Among Many Raters, Psychological Bulletin 76, 378-382 (1971).
	21	J.D. Chase, Dissertation, A Study to Derive An Empirical Definition of Behavioral Representation Techniques, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, to appear.