ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Distributed collaborative writing: a comparison of spoken and written modalities for reviewing and revising documents
Full text PdfPdf (903 KB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: celebrating interdependence table of contents
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Pages: 51 - 57  
Year of Publication: 1994
ISBN:0-89791-650-6
Authors
Christine M. Neuwirth  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Ravinder Chandhok  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
David Charney  Penn State University, University Park, PA
Patricia Wojahn  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Loel Kim  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Sponsors
SIGCAPH: ACM SIGCAPH Computers and the Physically Handicapped
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
SIGGROUP: ACM Special Interest Group on Supporting Group Work
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 16,   Downloads (12 Months): 59,   Citation Count: 8
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/191666.191693
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The Psychology of Written Composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2
3
 
4
Gould, J. D. (1978). An experimental study of writing, dictating, and speaking. In J. Requin (Ed.), Attention and Performance VII (pp. 299- 319). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5
 
6
Hawisher, G. E. (1989). Research and recommendations for computers and composition. In G. E. Hawisher & C. L. Selfe (Eds.), Critical perspectives on computers and composition instruction (pp. 44-69). New York: Teachers College.
 
7
Hayes, J. R., Flower, L., Schriver, K. A., Stratman, J., & Carey, L. (1987). Cognitive processes in revision. In S. Rosenberg (Eds.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics, Vol. H (pp. 177-249). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
 
8
Kiesler, S., Zubrow, D., Moses, A. M., & Geller, V. (1985). Affect in computer-mediated communication: An experiment in synchronous terminal-to-terminal discussion. Human-Computer Interaction, 1, 77- i04.
 
9
Kraut, R.E, Galegher, J., Fish, R.S., & Chalfonte, B. (1992). Task requirements and media choice in collaborative writing. Human-Computer Interaction, 7, 375-407.
10
11
 
12
O'Keefe, D. J. (1990). Persuasion: Theory and Research. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
 
13
Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections. Boston, MA: MIT Press.

CITED BY  8

Collaborative Colleagues:
Christine M. Neuwirth: colleagues
Ravinder Chandhok: colleagues
David Charney: colleagues
Patricia Wojahn: colleagues
Loel Kim: colleagues