| Hashing by proximity to process duplicates in spatial databases |
| Full text |
Pdf
(953 KB)
|
| Source
|
Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
archive
Proceedings of the third international conference on Information and knowledge management
table of contents
Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States
Pages: 347 - 354
Year of Publication: 1994
ISBN:0-89791-674-3
|
|
Authors
|
|
Walid G. Aref
|
Matsushita Information Technology Laboratory, Two Research Way, Princeton, New Jersey
|
|
Hanan Samet
|
Computer Science Department and Center for Automation Research and Institute for Advanced Computer Studies, The University of Maryland College Park, Maryland
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2, Downloads (12 Months): 22, Citation Count: 9
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
In a spatial database, an object may extend arbitrarily in space. As a result, many spatial data structures (e.g., the quadtree, the cell tree, the R+-tree) represent an object by partitioning it into multiple, yet simple, pieces, each of which is stored separately inside the data structure. Many operations on these data structures are likely to produce duplicate results because of the multiplicity of object pieces. A novel approach for duplicate processing based on proximity of spatial objects is presented. This is different from conventional duplicate elimination in database systems because, with spatial databases, different pieces of the same object can span multiple buckets of the underlying data structure. Example algorithms are presented to perform duplicate processing using proximity for quadtree representation of line segments and arbitrary rectangles. The complexity of the algorithms is seen to depend on a geometric classification of different instances of the spatial objects. By using proximity and the spatial properties of the objects, the number of disk-I/O requests as well as the run-time storage during duplicate processing can be reduced.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
W. G. Aref and H. Samet. Uniquely reporting spatial objects: Yet another operation for comparing spatial data structures. In Proceedings o.f the 5th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, pages 178-189, Charleston, SC, August 1992.
|
| |
3
|
M. B. Dillencourt and H. Samet. Using topological sweep to extract the boundaries of regions in maps represented by region quadtrees. Submitted for publication, 1991.
|
 |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
|
 |
6
|
Christos Faloutsos , Timos Sellis , Nick Roussopoulos, Analysis of object oriented spatial access methods, Proceedings of the 1987 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, p.426-439, May 27-29, 1987, San Francisco, California, United States
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
|
 |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
A Klinger. Patterns and search statistics. In J. S. Rustagi, editor, Optimizing Methods in Statistics, pages 303-337. Academic Press, New York, 1971.
|
 |
11
|
|
 |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
|
 |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
|
|