ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Support for the file system security requirements of computational E-mail systems
Full text PdfPdf (866 KB)
Source Conference on Computer and Communications Security archive
Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Computer and communications security table of contents
Fairfax, Virginia, United States
Pages: 1 - 9  
Year of Publication: 1994
ISBN:0-89791-732-4
Authors
Trent Jaeger  Software Systems Research Laboratory, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Atul Prakash  Software Systems Research Laboratory, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Sponsor
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 29,   Citation Count: 7
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/191177.191179
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Computational e-mail systems, which allow mail messages to contain command scripts that automatically execute upon receipt, can be used as a basis for building a variety of collaborative applications. However, their use also presents a serious security problem because a command script from a sender may access/modify receiver's private files or execute applications on receiver's behalf. Existing solutions to the problem either severely restrict I/O capability of scripts, limiting the range of applications that can be supported over computational e-mail, or permit all I/O to scripts, potentially compromising the security of the receiver's files. Our model, called the intersection model of security, permits I/O for e-mail from trusted senders but without compromising the security of private files. We describe two implementations of our security model: an interpreter-level implementation and an operating systems-level implementation. We discuss the tradeoffs between the two implementations and suggest directions for future work.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
 
3
N. S. Borenstein and N. Freed. MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions): Mechanisms for specifying and describing the format of internet message bodies. RFC 1521.
4
5
 
6
M. Knister and A. Prakash. Issues in the design of a toolkit for supporting multiple group editors. Computing Systems, 6(2):135-166, 1993.
 
7
8
9
 
10
 
11
J. G. Steiner, C. Neumann, and J. J. Schiller. Kerberos: An authentication service for open network systems. In Proceedings of the Usenix Conference, pages 191-202, 1988.
 
12
J. Sweet. A multi-media e-mail tutorial with MH.
 
13
J. E. White. Telescript technology: The foundation for the electronic marketplace. GenerM Magic White Paper.

CITED BY  7

Collaborative Colleagues:
Trent Jaeger: colleagues
Atul Prakash: colleagues