Peer learning in an introductory computer science course

ABSTRACT

A problem in teaching large introductory computer science courses is to overcome the impersonality of the large lecture class and to provide more personal attention to individual students. Our approach is to use peer learning experiences to instill in students the need to take responsibility for their learning and for the learning of those around them. Recent work has shown that educational quality for students and productivity for faculty can be enhanced through use of peer-learning environments where students do not just learn and faculty do not just teach.The novel aspects of our work are to apply group learning in a large introductory computer science class setting and to expect more responsibility on the part of students for their learning. In support of these goals we have introduced the use of upper-level undergraduate students to help facilitate student group interaction. In addition, we have developed software to minimize the administrative overhead of handling many groups and for students to electronically record group learning activities.

REFERENCES

• 1: Chris C. Bonwell and James A. Eison. Active learning (creating excitement in the classroom). ASttE-ERIC Higher Education Report 91- 1, 1991.
• 2: Rich Cohen and Warren Keuffel. Pull together! Computer Language, 8(8):36-44, August 1991.
• 3: Leonard Goodwin, Judith E. Miller, and Ronald D. Cheetham. Teaching freshmen to think~does active learning work. BzoSc~ence, 41(10):719-722, November 1991.
• 4: B. Hartfield , Terry Winograd , John Bennett, Learning HCI design: mentoring project groups in a course on human-computer interaction, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.24 n.1, p.246-251, March 1992
• 5: David W. Johnson, Roger T. Johnson, and Karl A. Smith. Cooperative learning (increasing college faculty instructional productivity). ASHE-ERIC Higher Educalion Report 91-1, 1991.
• 6: Robert E. Kinicki and Craig E. Wills. 1993 computer science department MQP review. Technical Report WPI-CS-TR-93-5, Worcester Polytechnic institute, August 1993.
• 7: Richard J. Light. The Harvard assessment seminars: Explorations with students and faculty about teaching, learning and student life, First Report 1990.
• 8: Joseph D. Novak and D. Bob Gowin. New strategies for evaluation: Concept mapping. In Learning How to Learn, chapter 5. Cambridge University Press, 1984.
• 9: Hassan Pournaghshband. The students' problems in courses with team projects. SIGCSE Bulletin, 21(1):37-41, February 1989.
• 10: Steven L. Tanimoto. Beyond the naivety of grades: Educational record keeping for the twenty-first century. Technical Report 92-07-09, Department of Computer Science and{ Engineering, University of Washington, October 1992.
• 11: E. J. Thomas and C. F.Fink. The effects of group size. Psychologzcal Bulletin, 60:371-385, 1963.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
      K.3.2 Computer and Information Science Education
          Subjects: Computer science education

Additional Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING

  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES
      H.1.2 User/Machine Systems
          Subjects: Human factors

General Terms:
Human Factors, Languages