ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On a modular algorithm for computing GCDs of polynomials over algebraic number fields
Full text PdfPdf (849 KB)
Source International Conference on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation archive
Proceedings of the international symposium on Symbolic and algebraic computation table of contents
Oxford, United Kingdom
Pages: 58 - 65  
Year of Publication: 1994
ISBN:0-89791-638-7
Author
Mark J. Encarnación  Research Institute for Symbolic Computation, Johannes Kepler Universität, A-4040 Linz, Austria
Sponsor
SIGSAM: ACM Special Interest Group on Symbolic and Algebraic Manipulation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 14,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/190347.190365
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Modular methods for computing the gcd of two univariate polynomials over an algebraic number field require a priori knowledge about the denominators of the rational numbers in the representation of the gcd. We derive a multiplicative bound for these denominators without assuming that the number generating the field is an algebraic integer. Consequently, the gcd algorithm of Langemyr and McCallum [J. Symbolic Computation, 8:429-448, 1989] can now be applied directly to polynomials that are not necessarily represented in terms of an algebraic integer. Worst-case analyses and experiments with an implementation show that by avoiding a conversion of representation the reduction in the computing time can be significant. We also suggest the use of an algorithm for recovering a rational number from its modular residue so that the denominator bound need not be computed explicitly. Experiments and analyses indicate that this is a good practical alternative.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
M. J. Encarnaci6n. A Lehmer-type algorithm for recovering a rational number from its modular residue. In preparation, 1994.
 
6
E. Hecke. Lectures on the Theory of Algebraic Numbers. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, 1981.
 
7
W. V. D. Hodge and D. Pedoe. Methods of Algebraic Geometry, Book I. Cambridge Uniw~rsity Press, 1946.
 
8
 
9
L. Langemyr. Computing She G CD of Swo Polynomials Over an Algebraic Number Field. PhD thesis, NADA, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 1988.
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
A. K. Lenstra. Polynomial-time Algorithms .for ~he Factorization of Polynomials. PhD thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam, 1984.
 
14
R. Loos. Generalized polynomial remainder sequences. In B. Buchberger, G. E. Collins, and R. Loos, editors, Computer Algebra--Symbolic and Algebraic CompuSation, pages 115-138. Springer-Verlag, 2nd edition, 1982.
 
15
D. A. Marcus. Number Fields. Springer-Verlag, 1977.
 
16
M. Mignotte. An inequality about factors of polynomials. Mathematics of Computation, 28(128):1153-1157, 1974.
 
17
M. Mignotte. Some useful bounds. In B. Buchberger, G. E. Collins, and R. Loos, editors, Computer Algebra~Symbolic and Algebraic Computation, pages 259-263. Springer-Verlag, 2nd edition, 1982.
 
18
 
19
M. E. Pohst. Computational Algebraic Number Theory. DMV Seminar Band 21. Springer-Verlag, 1993.
 
20
 
21
SACLIB 1.1 User's Guide. Technical Report 93-19, RISC-Linz, Johannes Kepler University, A-4040 Linz, Austria, March 1993.
22
23
24
25


Collaborative Colleagues:
Mark J. Encarnación: colleagues