ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Selecting tests and identifying test coverage requirements for modified software
Full text PdfPdf (1.69 MB)
Source International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis archive
Proceedings of the 1994 ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on Software testing and analysis table of contents
Seattle, Washington, United States
Pages: 169 - 184  
Year of Publication: 1994
ISBN:0-89791-683-2
Authors
Gregg Rothermel  Department of Computer Science, Clemson University, Clemson, SC
Mary Jean Harrold  Department of Computer Science, Clemson University, Clemson, SC
Sponsor
SIGSOFT: ACM Special Interest Group on Software Engineering
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 56,   Citation Count: 23
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/186258.187171
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
3
 
4
P. Benedusi, A. Cimitile, and U. De Carlini. Postmaintenance testing based on path change analysis. In Proceedings of the Con/erence on Software Maintenance - 1988, pages 352-61, October 1988.
5
 
6
K.F. Fischer, F. Rail, and A. Chruscicki. A methodology for retesting modified software. In Proceedings o/the National Telecommunications Conference B-6-3, pages 1-6, November 1981.
 
7
M.J. Harrold and M.L. Sofia. An incremental approach to unit testing during maintenance. In Proceedings o:f the Conference on Software Maintenance. 1988, pages 362-367, October 1988.
8
 
9
10
11
12
13
 
14
J. Laski and W. Szermer. Identification of program modifications and its applications in software maintentance. In Proceedings o/the Conference on Software Maintenance- 1992, pages 282-90, November 1992.
 
15
H.K.N. Leung and L.j. White. A study of integration testing and software regression at the integration level. In Proceedings o/the Conference on Software Maintenance. 1990, pages 290-300, November 1990.
 
16
tt.K.N. Leung and L.J. White. A cost model to compare regression test strategies. In Proceedings o/the Conference on Software Maintenance- 1991, pages 201-8, October 1991.
 
17
T.J. Ostrand and E.J. Weyuker. Using dataflow analysis for regression testing. In Proceedings o/the Sixth Annual Pacific Northwest Software Quality Conference, pages 233-47, September 1988.
 
18
 
19
G. Rothermel and M.J. Harrold. A comparison of regression test selection techniques. Technical Report 118, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, April 1993.
 
20
 
21
 
22
B. Sherhnd and B. Korel. Modification oriented software testing. In Conference Proceedings: Quality Week 1991, pages 1-17, May 1991.
 
23
A.B. Taha, S.M. Thebaut, and S.S. Liu. An approach to software fault localization ~nd revalidation based on incremental data flow analysis. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual international Computer Software and Applications Conference, pages 527-34, September 1989.
 
24
 
25
S.S. Yau and Z. Kishimoto. A method for revalidating modified programs in the maintenance phase. In Proceedings of the COMPSA C '87: The Eleventh Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference, perges 272-77, October 1987.

CITED BY  23

Collaborative Colleagues:
Gregg Rothermel: colleagues
Mary Jean Harrold: colleagues