ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Preference-based decision making for cooperative knowledge-based systems
Full text PdfPdf (1.95 MB)
Source ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) archive
Volume 12 ,  Issue 4  (October 1994) table of contents
Pages: 407 - 435  
Year of Publication: 1994
ISSN:1046-8188
Author
Stephen T. C. Wong  Institute for New Generation Computer Technology (ICOT), Tokyo, Japan
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 33,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   review  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/185462.185484
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Recent advances in cooperative knowledge-based systems (CKBS) offer significant promise for intelligent interaction between multiple AI systems for solving larger, more complex problems. In this paper, we propose a logical, qualitative problem-solving scheme for CKBS that uses social choice theory as a formal basis for making joint decisions and promoting conflict resolution. This scheme consists of three steps: (1) the selection of decision criteria and competing alternatives, (2) the formation of preference profiles and collective choices, and (3) the negotiation among agents as conflicts arise in group decision making. In this paper, we focus on the computational mechanisms developed to support steps (2) and (3) of the scheme. In addition, the practicality of the scheme is illustrated with examples taken from a working prototype dealing with collaborative structural design of buildings.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
ARROW, K. J. 1951 Social Choice and Indtwdual Values. Wiley, New York.
 
2
ATLSS CENTER. 1992. Sixth-year renewal proposal to the NSF, Vol. 2: Projects, Publications, and Biosketches. ATLSS Drive, Imbt Lab., Lehigh Umversity, Bethlehem, Pa., Section 7.
 
3
BORDA, J. C. 1953. Memoire sur les Electzons au Scrutin, 1781. Ists, 44. English translation by A. De Grazla.
 
4
 
5
CARNAP, R. 1962. Logical Foundations of Probability. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, I1.
 
6
CONDORCET, M. 1785. Essaz sur l;4pplzcat~on de I54nalyse a la Probabilitie des Dects~ons rendues ~ la pluralitd des vo~x. Paris, L'Imprimerie Royale.
 
7
 
8
DAVIS, M. 1973. Game Theory. Basic Books, New York.
 
9
DAVIS, R., BUCHANAN, G., AND SHORTLIFEE, E. 1-I 1977. Production rules as a representation of a knowledge base consultation system. Arttf. Intell. 8, 15-45.
 
10
 
11
DOYLE, J. 1979. A truth maintenance system Artif. InteIl. 12, 2, 231 272.
 
12
DURFEE, E. H., LESSER, V. R., AND CORKILL, D. D. 1989. Cooperative distributed problem solving. In The Handbook of Artzficial Intelhgence, vol. iv, A. Barr P. R. Cohen, E. A. Feigenbaum, Eds., 83-148.
 
13
EBBINGHAUS, H. 1885. Memory. Wiley, New York. Translated in 1964.
 
14
EPHRATI, E., AND ROSENSCHEIN, J. S. 1991. The Clarke tax as a consensus mechanism among automated agents. In Proceedzngs 9th AAAI Conference (July). AAAI/MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 173 178.
 
15
GA~DENFORS, P. 1988. Knowledge in Flux--Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemlc States. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
 
16
GASSER, L., AND HILL, R. W. 1989-90. Coordinated problem solvers. Ann. Rev. Comput. Sci. 4, 203-254.
 
17
 
18
GALBRAITH, J 1977. OrgamzationalDesign. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
 
19
KRAUS, S., AND WILKENFELD, J. 1991. Negotmtions over time in a multi-agent environment: prehminary report. In Proceedings 12th IJCAI Con{erence (Sydney, Australia, Aug.), 56 61.
 
20
 
21
MORIZET-MAHOUOF, AX, P. 1991. Maintaining consistency of a database during monitoring of an evolving process by a knowledge-based systems. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 21, 1, 47 60.
 
22
 
23
SEARLE, J. R., AND VANDERVEKEN, D. 1985. Foundation of Illocutionary Logtc. Cambridge Umverslty Press, Cambridge, Mass.
 
24
SEN, A. 1970. Collective Choice and Social Welfare. Holden-Day, San Francisco.
 
25
SEN, A. 1982. Choice, Welfare, and Measurement. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
 
26
SHAFER, G. 1976. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
 
27
STERLING, L., AND YALCINALP, L. U. 1989. Explaining Prolog based expert systems using a layered metainterpreter. In Proceedings of the 11th IJCAI, 66-71.
 
28
SYKES, E. A., AND WroTE, C. C. 1991. Multiobjective intelligent computer-aided design. IEEE Truns. Syst. Man. Cybern. 21, 6 (Nov./Dec.), 1498-1511.
 
29
 
30
 
31
WONG, S. T. C. 1992. A communication scheme for cooperative systems communication. In Proceedings of Multi-ugents Cooperatwe Computing Workshop (Kobe, Japan, Dec.).
32
 
33
YON NEUMANN, J., AND MORGENSTERN, O. 1944. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
 
34
ZADEH, L. A. 1975. Fuzzy logic and approximate reasoning. Synthese. 30.



REVIEW

"Jonathan P. E. Hodgson : Reviewer"

A major problem for cooperative systems is that each agent is likely to have its own system of preferences. Arriving at a collective decision requires that disparate preferences be resolved in some way. The author describes a system, derived f  more...