|
ABSTRACT
The paper gives an overview of theoretical results in the rapidly growing field of inductive logic programming (ILP). The ILP learning situation (generality model, background knowledge, examples, hypotheses) is formally characterized and various restrictions of it are discussed in the light of their impact on learnability. The two dominant models of learnability, PAC-learning and identification in the limit, are extended to take into account the ILP learning situation. Several learnability results for logic programs are then presented, both positive and negative.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
R. B. Banerji. Learning in the limit in a growing language. In <i>Proc. Tenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence,</i> pages 280--282. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1987.
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
K. L. Clark. Negation as failure. In H. Gallaire and J. Minker, editors, <i>Logic and Databases,</i> pages 293--322. Plenum Press, New York, 1978.
|
| |
5
|
W. W. Cohen. Cryptographic limitations on learning one-clause logic programs. In <i>Proc. Tenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence,</i> pages 80--85. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993.
|
| |
6
|
W. W. Cohen. Learnability of restricted logic programs. In S. Muggleton, editor, <i>Proc. Third International Workshop on Inductive Logic Programming, ILP'93,</i> pages 41--71. Jožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 1993.
|
| |
7
|
W. W. Cohen. Pac-learning a restricted class of recursive logic programs. In <i>Proc. Tenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence,</i> pages 86--92. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993.
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
S. Džeroski and N. Lavrač. Refinement graphs for FOIL and LINUS. In S. H. Muggleton, editor, <i>Inductive Logic Programming,</i> pages 319--333. Academic Press, London, 1992.
|
 |
11
|
Sašo Džeroski , Stephen Muggleton , Stuart Russell, PAC-learnability of determinate logic programs, Proceedings of the fifth annual workshop on Computational learning theory, p.128-135, July 27-29, 1992, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
[doi> 10.1145/130385.130399]
|
| |
12
|
M. Frazier and C. D. Page. Learnability in inductive logic programming: Some results and techniques. In <i>Proc. Tenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence,</i> pages 93--98. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993.
|
| |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
E. M. Gold. Language identification in the limit. <i>Information and Control,</i> 10:447--474, 1967.
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
|
| |
18
|
|
| |
19
|
|
| |
20
|
P. Idestam-Almquist. Recursive anti-unification. In S. Muggleton, editor, <i>Proc. Third International Workshop on Inductive Logic Programming, ILP'93,</i> pages 241--254. Jožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 1993.
|
| |
21
|
J.-U. Kietz. A comparative study of structural most specific generalizations used in machine learning. In S. Muggleton, editor, <i>Proc. Third International Workshop on Inductive Logic Programming, ILP'93,</i> pages 149--164. Jožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 1993.
|
| |
22
|
J.-U. Kietz and S. Wrobel. Controlling the complexity of learning through syntactic and task-oriented models. In S. H. Muggleton, editor, <i>Inductive Logic Programming,</i> pages 107--126. Academic Press, London, 1992.
|
| |
23
|
|
| |
24
|
|
| |
25
|
|
| |
26
|
|
| |
27
|
J. Marcinkowski and L. Pacholski. Undecidability of the Hornclause implication problem. In <i>Proc. 33rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science,</i> pages 354--362. 1992.
|
| |
28
|
|
| |
29
|
S. H. Muggleton, editor. <i>Inductive Logic Programming.</i> Academic Press, London, 1992.
|
| |
30
|
S. H. Muggleton. Inverting implication. <i>Artificial Intelligence Journal,</i> 1993. To appear.
|
| |
31
|
S. H. Muggleton and C. Feng. Efficient induction of logic programs. In <i>Proc. First Conference on Algorithmic Learning Theory,</i> pages 368--381. Ohmsha, Tokyo, 1990.
|
| |
32
|
T. Niblett. A study of generalization in logic programs. In <i>Proc. Third European Working Session on Learning.</i> Pitmann, London, 1988.
|
| |
33
|
C. D. Page and A. M. Frisch. Generalization and learn-ability: a study of constrained atoms. In S. H. Muggleton, editor, <i>Inductive Logic Programming,</i> pages 29--61. Academic Press, London, 1992.
|
| |
34
|
|
| |
35
|
G. D. Plotkin. A note on inductive generalization. In B. Meltzer and D. Michie, editors, <i>Machine Intelligence,</i> pages 153 - 163. American Elsevier, 1970.
|
| |
36
|
G. D. Plotkin. <i>Automatic Methods of Inductive Inference.</i> PhD thesis, Edinburgh University, 1971.
|
| |
37
|
G. D. Plotkin. A further note on inductive generalization. In B. Meltzer and D. Michie, editors, <i>Machine Intelligence,</i> pages 101 - 124. American Elsevier, 1971.
|
| |
38
|
K. R. Popper. <i>The Logic of Scientific Discovery.</i> Basic Books, New York, 1959.
|
| |
39
|
|
| |
40
|
|
 |
41
|
|
| |
42
|
|
| |
43
|
|
 |
44
|
|
| |
45
|
|
| |
46
|
|
CITED BY 13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tamás Horváth , Robert H. Sloan , György Turán, Learning logic programs by using the product homomorphism method, Proceedings of the tenth annual conference on Computational learning theory, p.10-20, July 06-09, 1997, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|