ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The interaction between virtual channel flow control and adaptive routing in wormhole networks
Full text PdfPdf (967 KB)
Source International Conference on Supercomputing archive
Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Supercomputing table of contents
Manchester, England
Pages: 136 - 145  
Year of Publication: 1994
ISBN:0-89791-665-4
Authors
Swaminathan Ramany  Department of Computational Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada S7N 0W0
Derek Eager  Department of Computational Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada S7N 0W0
Sponsor
SIGARCH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Architecture
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 8,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/181181.181327
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Multiprocessor interconnection networks based on low dimensional mesh or torus topologies and employing wormhole switching have become increasingly popular. Two concepts that have been proposed to improve the performance of such networks are Virtual Channel Flow Control (VCFC) and adaptive routing. Some previous studies have, however, found the latter technique to yield disappointing performance under uniform traffic patterns, while in this work we show that the former technique may result in degraded performance under certain non-uniform traffic patterns. This paper studies the interaction between VCFC and adaptive routing. It is shown that each of these techniques may yield unsatisfactory performance only when used in isolation, and that through their appropriate combination uniformly improved performance can be achieved. The consistent performance improvement and the magnitude of the performance improvement in some cases offers compelling motivation for implementing a combination of VCFC and adaptive routing in future machines.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
3
4
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
10
 
11
C.J. Glass and L.M. Ni, "Adaptive Routing in Mesh- Connected Networks", Technical Report MSU-CPS- ACS-45, M~higan State University, Oct. 1991.
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
G.F. Pfister and V.A. Norton, "Hot Spot Contention and Combining in Mult~tage Interconnection Networks", IEEE Transactions on Computers, Vol. 34, No. 10, Oct. 1985, pp. 943-948.
16
 
17
C. Su and K.G. Shin, "Adap~ve Deadlock-Free Routing in Multicomputers U~ng Only One Extra Virtual Channel", Proceedings of the 1993 International Conference on Parallel Processin~ Aug. 1993, Vol. I, pp. 227-231.
18


Collaborative Colleagues:
Swaminathan Ramany: colleagues
Derek Eager: colleagues