|
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Anderson, N.S. Methods for combining human factors research results: Meta-analysis. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Socity Thirty-Third Annuul Meeting Santa Monica, Caif. Human Factors Socity, 1989, pp. 594-596.
|
| |
2
|
Chambers, J.M., Ceveland, W.S., Kleiner, B., and Turkey, P.A.Graphical Methods for Data Anaysis. Wadsworth Internationa Group, Belmont, Calif., 1983.
|
| |
3
|
Grudin, J. and Macean, A. Adapting a psychophysical method to measure performance and preference tradeoffs in humen-computer interaction. In Proceeding of the INTERACT'84 First IFIP Conference on Humen- Computer Interaction. IFIP, Washington, D.C., pp. 737-741.
|
| |
4
|
Hunter, J.E., Schmidt, F.L., and Jackson, G.B. Meta-analysis: Cumulative Research Findings Across Studies. Sage Pubication, Newbury Park, Calif., 1982.
|
| |
5
|
LaLomia, M.J. and Sidewski, J.B. Measurements of computer satisfaction, Literecy, and aptitudes: A review Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interaction 2,3 (1990), 231-253.
|
| |
6
|
LLandauer, T.K. Research methods in humen-computer interaction. In Handbook of Humen-Computer Interaction. Elsevier Science publishers, Amsterdam, 1988, pp. 905-928.
|
| |
7
|
Macean, A., Barnard, P.J., and Wilson, M.D. Evaluating the humen interface of a data entry system: User choise and performance measures Yied different tradfe-off functions. In Peope and Computers: Designing the Interface. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1985.
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
Nielson, J.What do users really want? Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interaction 1, 2 (1989), 137-147.
|
| |
11
|
|
 |
12
|
J. Nielsen , R. L. Mack , K. H. Bergendorff , N. L. Grischkowsky, Integrated software usage in the professional work environment: evidence from questionnaires and interviews, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.162-167, April 13-17, 1986, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
|
| |
13
|
Rogers, E.M. Methodology for metaresearch. In Organizationa Communication Vo. 10. Abstracts, Analysis, and overview. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, Calif., 1985, pp. 13-33.
|
 |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
Whiteside, J., Bennett, J., and Holtzblatt, K. Usabiity engineering: Our experience and evoution. In Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction. Elsevier Science publishers, Amsterdam, 1988, pp. 791-817.
|
 |
16
|
|
CITED BY 32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Erik Frøkjær , Morten Hertzum , Kasper Hornbæk, Measuring usability: are effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction really correlated?, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.345-352, April 01-06, 2000, The Hague, The Netherlands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barbara M. Wildemuth , Gary Marchionini , Meng Yang , Gary Geisler , Todd Wilkens , Anthony Hughes , Richard Gruss, How fast is too fast?: evaluating fast forward surrogates for digital video, Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries, May 27-31, 2003, Houston, Texas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maiju Markova , Anne Aula , Teija Vainio , Heli Wigelius , Minna Kulju, MoBiS-Q: a tool for evaluating the success of mobile business services, Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services, p.238-245, September 09-12, 2007, Singapore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diane Kelly , Chirag Shah , Cassidy R. Sugimoto , Earl W. Bailey , Rachael A. Clemens , Ann K. Irvine , Nicholas A. Johnson , Weimao Ke , Sanghee Oh , Anezka Poljakova , Marcos A. Rodriguez , Megan G. van Noord , Yan Zhang, Effects of performance feedback on users' evaluations of an interactive IR system, Proceedings of the second international symposium on Information interaction in context, October 14-17, 2008, London, United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVIEW
"Richard A. Baker, Jr. : Reviewer"
Nielsen and Levy describe a metastudy comparing the measured
usability of subjective preferences and objective performance. The paper
is very disappointing in its content. Much of the text concentrates on
describing how the meta
more...
|