ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Measuring usability: preference vs. performance
Full text PdfPdf (12.52 MB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 37 ,  Issue 4  (April 1994) table of contents
Pages: 66 - 75  
Year of Publication: 1994
ISSN:0001-0782
Authors
Jakob Nielsen  Bellcore, Morristown, NJ
Jonathan Levy  Univ. of California, San Diego
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 52,   Downloads (12 Months): 314,   Citation Count: 32
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/175276.175282
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Anderson, N.S. Methods for combining human factors research results: Meta-analysis. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Socity Thirty-Third Annuul Meeting Santa Monica, Caif. Human Factors Socity, 1989, pp. 594-596.
 
2
Chambers, J.M., Ceveland, W.S., Kleiner, B., and Turkey, P.A.Graphical Methods for Data Anaysis. Wadsworth Internationa Group, Belmont, Calif., 1983.
 
3
Grudin, J. and Macean, A. Adapting a psychophysical method to measure performance and preference tradeoffs in humen-computer interaction. In Proceeding of the INTERACT'84 First IFIP Conference on Humen- Computer Interaction. IFIP, Washington, D.C., pp. 737-741.
 
4
Hunter, J.E., Schmidt, F.L., and Jackson, G.B. Meta-analysis: Cumulative Research Findings Across Studies. Sage Pubication, Newbury Park, Calif., 1982.
 
5
LaLomia, M.J. and Sidewski, J.B. Measurements of computer satisfaction, Literecy, and aptitudes: A review Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interaction 2,3 (1990), 231-253.
 
6
LLandauer, T.K. Research methods in humen-computer interaction. In Handbook of Humen-Computer Interaction. Elsevier Science publishers, Amsterdam, 1988, pp. 905-928.
 
7
Macean, A., Barnard, P.J., and Wilson, M.D. Evaluating the humen interface of a data entry system: User choise and performance measures Yied different tradfe-off functions. In Peope and Computers: Designing the Interface. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1985.
 
8
 
9
 
10
Nielson, J.What do users really want? Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interaction 1, 2 (1989), 137-147.
 
11
12
 
13
Rogers, E.M. Methodology for metaresearch. In Organizationa Communication Vo. 10. Abstracts, Analysis, and overview. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, Calif., 1985, pp. 13-33.
14
 
15
Whiteside, J., Bennett, J., and Holtzblatt, K. Usabiity engineering: Our experience and evoution. In Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction. Elsevier Science publishers, Amsterdam, 1988, pp. 791-817.
16

CITED BY  32


REVIEW

"Richard A. Baker, Jr. : Reviewer"

Nielsen and Levy describe a metastudy comparing the measured usability of subjective preferences and objective performance. The paper is very disappointing in its content. Much of the text concentrates on describing how the meta more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
Jakob Nielsen: colleagues
Jonathan Levy: colleagues