ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Computing the future: whither computer science and engineering?
Full text PdfPdf (62 KB)
Source ACM Annual Computer Science Conference archive
Proceedings of the 1993 ACM conference on Computer science table of contents
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Page: 530  
Year of Publication: 1993
ISBN:0-89791-558-5
Authors
Juris Hartmanis  Cornell University
John Rice  Purdue University
Morton Lowengrub  Indiana University
Chairmen
Herbert S. Lin  National Academy of Science
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 0,   Downloads (12 Months): 12,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/170791.171162
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The Computer Science and Telecommunications Board of the National Research Council recently released a report entitled Computing the Future: A Broader Agenda for Computer Science and Engineering. The report is intended as a first step in developing a vision of computer science and engineering that will carry the discipline into the 21st Century. Acknowledging the fraying of the social compact that has supported scientific research since World War II, pressures on academic science, and major changes in the computer industry, the report puts forward a view that the intellectual boundaries of the CS&E discipline should expand. The discipline should continue to support what has been traditionally been considered “core” computer science and engineering, but it should also learn to embrace rather than eschew computing problems that arise in domains outside the traditional core. Such problem domains include other sciences and areas with commercial or economic, significance. This broader agenda will have many benefits for CS&E, including a rich set of intellectually challenging problems, greater social impact, and a wider variety of funding opportunities. Not surprisingly, this vision of the field in the 21st Century has generated considerable controversy and debate, as is appropriate for matters as important as these. A panel will briefly review the major judgments, priorities, and recommendations of the report, and differing perspectives on the report will be aired.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Juris Hartmanis: colleagues
John Rice: colleagues
Morton Lowengrub: colleagues
Herbert S. Lin: colleagues