Monte Carlo simulations of Quantum systems on massively parallel computers

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Monte Carlo simulations of Quantum systems on massively parallel computers

Full text

Pdf (898 KB)

Source

Conference on High Performance Networking and Computing archive
Proceedings of the 1993 ACM/IEEE conference on Supercomputing table of contents

Portland, Oregon, United States

Pages: 34 - 43

Year of Publication: 1993

ISBN:0-8186-4340-4

Author

H. Q. Ding

Concurrent Supercomputing Facilities, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California

Sponsor

SIGARCH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Architecture

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 1, Downloads (12 Months): 5, Citation Count: 0

Additional Information:

references index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/169627.169645 What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	P.W. Anderson, Science, 235, 1196 (1987). P.W. Anderson and J.R. Schrieifer, Physics Today, 44, 55 (June 1991).
	2	Two reviews are given by S. Chakravaxty, in High Temperature Superconductivity Proceedings, Los Alamos Symposium 1989, ed. K.S.Bedell, et al., Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1990, and by T. Barnes, Int.J.Mod.Phys.C2, 659 (1991).
	3	W.R. Somsky and J.E. Gubernatis, Uomput. Phys. 6, 178 (1992). This paper also contains the Cray YMP results obtained by H.Q.Lin.
	4	H.Q. Ding and M.S. Makivic, Phys.Rev.Lett. 64, 1449 (1990). M.S. Makivic and H.Q. Ding, Phys.Rev. B43, 3562 (1991). H.Q. Ding, Phys.lett. A 59, 355 (1991).
	5	H.Q. Ding Phys.Rev.Lett. 68, 1927 (1992).
	6	H.Q. Ding, J. Phys: Condens Matter, 2, 7979 (1990).
	7	H.Q. Ding Phys.Rev. B45, 230 (1992).
	8	"Towards Explaining Superconductivity", J. Maddox, Nature, 844, 485 (1990)}.
	9	E. Loh, D.J. Scalapino and P.M. Grant, Physica Script 32,327 (1085); Phys.Rev. B31, 4712 (1985).
	10	M. Suzuki, J. Stat. Phys. 43, 883 (1986).
	11	J.E. tIirsch, D.J. Scalapino, R.L. Sugar, and R. Blankenbecler, Phys. Rev. B 26, 5033 (1982).
	12	3. Tobochnik, G. Batrouni, and H. Gould, Cornput. Phys. 6, 673 (1992).
	13	J. D. Reger and A. P. Young, Phys. Rev. B 37, 5978 (1988). Y. Okabe and M. Kikuchi, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 57, 4351 (1988). M. Gross, E. Sanchez- Velasco, and E. Siggia, Phys. Rev. B 39, 2484 (1989).
	14	Geoffrey C. Fox , Mark A. Johnson , Gregory A. Lyzenga , Steve W. Otto , John K. Salmon , David W. Walker, Solving problems on concurrent processors. Vol. 1: General techniques and regular problems, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1988
	15	H.Q. Ding, Caltech Report C3P-629, unpublished.
	16	Here we have not taken into account the fact that due to the increased number of interactions in the 2D case, the cost per site is roughly doubled in 2D as compared with 1D.