Distributed computation of wave propagation models using PVM

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Distributed computation of wave propagation models using PVM

Full text

Pdf (1.18 MB)

Source

Conference on High Performance Networking and Computing archive
Proceedings of the 1993 ACM/IEEE conference on Supercomputing table of contents

Portland, Oregon, United States

Pages: 22 - 31

Year of Publication: 1993

ISBN:0-8186-4340-4

Authors

J. S. Sochacki	Department of Mathematics, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA
D. Mitchum	Institute for Scientific Computation, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming
P. O'Leary	Institute for Scientific Computation, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming
R. E. Ewing	Institute for Scientific Computation, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
R. C. Sharpley	Department of Mathematics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC

Sponsor

SIGARCH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Architecture

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 0, Downloads (12 Months): 8, Citation Count: 0

Additional Information:

references index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/169627.169642 What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	R.M. Alford, K.R. Kelly, and D.M. Boore, Accuracy of finite-difference modeling of the acoustic wave equation, Geophyszcs 39(6) (1974), 834- 842.
	2	A. Beguelin, J. Dongarra, A. Geist, B. M anchek, and V.S. Sunderam, A user's guide to PVM parallel virtual machine, ORNL Technical Report, TM-1126, 1991.
	3	j.H. Bramble, J.E. Pasciak, j. Wang, and J. Xu, Convergence estimates for product iterative methods with applications to domain decomposition, Math. Comp. 57 (1991), 23-45.
	4	C. Cerjan, D. Kosloff, R. Kosloff, and M. Reshef, A non-reflecting boundary condition for discrete acoustic and elastic wave equations, Geophysics 50(8) (1985), 705-708.
	5	B. Enquist and A. Majda, Absorbing boundary conditions for the numerical simulation of waves, Math. Comp. 31(139) (1977), 629-651.
	6	R.E. Ewing, M.A. Celia, P. O'Leary, J.E. Pasciak and A. Vassilev, Parallelization of multiphase models for contaminant transport in porous media, Parallel Processzng for Scientific Computzng 1 (R. Sincovec, D. Keyes, M. Leuze, L. Petzold, and D. Reed, eds.), 1993, 83-91.
	7	W.M. Ewing, W.S. Jardetzky, and F. Press, Elastic Waves ~n Layered Medza, McGraw Hill, 1957.
	8	B. Fornberg, The pseudo spectral method: Accurate representation of interfaces in elastic wave equations, Geophysics 53(5) (1988), 625-637.
	9	G. A. Geist , V. S. Sunderam, Network-based concurrent computing on the PVM system, Concurrency: Practice and Experience, v.4 n.4, p.293-311, June 1992 [doi>10.1002/cpe.4330040403]
	10	T. Ha-Duong and P. Joly, A generalized principle of images for the wave equation with absorbing boundary conditions and applications to fourth order schemes, Math. Comp., (submitted).
	11	K.R. Kelly, R.W. Ward, S. Treitel, and R.M. A1- ford, Modeling- The forward method, Concepts and Techniques in Oil and Gas Exploratzon (K.C. Jain and R.J.P. de Figueiredo, eds.), Soc. E~pl. Geophys., 1982.
	12	A.R. Levander, Fourth-order finite-difference P- SV seismograms, Geophysics 53(11) (1988), 1425-1436.
	13	K.J. Marfurt, Accuracy of finite-difference and finite-element modeling of the scalar and elastic wave equation, Geophysics 49(5) (1984), 533- 549.
	14	M. Reshef, D. Kosloff, M. Edward, and C. Hsiung, Three dimensional acoustic modeling by the Fourier method, Geophysics 53(9) (1988), 1175- 1183.
	15	A.C. Reynolds, Boundary conditions for the numerical solution of wave propagation problems, Geophysics 43(6) (1978), 1099-1110.
	16	R.D. Richtmeyer and K.W. Morton, Difference Methods for Initial Value Problems, Interscience Publishers, New York, 1967.
	17	J.S. Sochacki, Absorbing boundary conditions using regions with exponential decay, Proceedings of First International Conference on Mathematical and Numerical Aspects of Wave Propagation Phenomena, Strasbourg, France, April 23-26, 1991, 293-302.
	18	J.S. Sochacki, R.E. Ewing, P. O'Leary, C. Bennett, and R. Sharpley, Seismic modeling and inversion on the NCUBE, The Fifth Distributed Memory Computing Conference 1 (D. Walker and Q. Strout, eds.), IEEE Computer Society Press, 1990, 530-535.
	19	J.S. Sochacki, J.H. George, R.E. Ewing, and S.B. Smithson, interface conditions for acoustic and elastic wave propagation, Geophysics 56(2) (1991), 161-181.
	20	J.S. Sochacki, R. Kubichek, J.H. George, W.R. Fletcher, and S.B. Smithson, Absorbing boundary conditions and surface waves, Geophysics 52(1) (1987), 60-71.
	21	Peter Sonneveld, CGS, a fast Lanczos-type solver for nonsymmetric linear systems, SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing, v.10 n.1, p.36-52, January 1989 [doi>10.1137/0910004]
	22	V. S. Sunderam, PVM: a framework for parallel distributed computing, Concurrency: Practice and Experience, v.2 n.4, p.315-339, Dec. 1990 [doi>10.1002/cpe.4330020404]
	23	J.E. VidMe and R.W. Clayton, A stable freesurface boundary condition for two-dimensional elastic wave propagation, Geophysics 51(12) (1986) 2247-2249.
	24	J. Virieux, SH-wave propagation in heterogeneous media: Velocity-stress finite-difference method, Geophysics 49(11) (1984), 1933-1957.
	25	J. Wen, G.A. McMechan, and M.W. Booth, Three dimensional modeling and migration of seismic data using Fourier transforms, Geophysics 53(9) (1988), 1194-1201.