Fish tank virtual reality

ABSTRACT

The defining characteristics of what we call “Fish Tank Virtual Reality” are a stereo image of a three dimensional (3D) scene viewed on a monitor using a perspective projection coupled to the head position of the observer. We discuss some of the relative merits of this mode of viewing as compared to head mounted stereo displays. In addition, we report the experimental investigation of the following variables: 1) whether or not the perspective view is coupled to the actual viewpoint of the observer, 2) whether stereopsis is employed. Experiment 1 involved the subjective comparison of pairs of viewing conditions and the results suggest that head coupling may be more important than stereo in yielding a strong impression of three dimensionality. Experiment 2 involved subjects tracing a path from a leaf of a 3D tree to the correct root (there were two trees intermeshed). The error rates ranged from 22% in the pictorial display, to 1.3% in the head coupled stereo display. The error rates for stereo alone and head coupling alone were 14.7% and 3.2% respectively. We conclude that head coupling is probably more important than stereo in 3D visualization and that head coupling and stereo combined provide an important enhancement to monitor based computer graphics.

REFERENCES

• 1: Michael Deering, High resolution virtual reality, ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, v.26 n.2, p.195-202, July 1992
• 2: Fairchild, K.M., Poltrock, E.E. and Furnas, G.W. (1988) SemNet: Three-Dimensional Graphic representations of large knowledge bases. In Cognitive Science and Its Applications for Human- Compbt~,, Interaction. Ed Raymond Guindon, Lawrence Erelbaum, 201-233.
• 3: M. Friedmann , T. Starner , Alex Pentland, Device synchronization using an optimal linear filter, Proceedings of the 1992 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics, p.57-62, June 1992, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States [doi>10.1145/147156.147164]
• 4: Gibson, J.J. (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin: Boston.
• 5: Howard, I.P. an Heckman, T. (1989) Circular vection as a function of the relative sizes, distances and positions of two competing visual displays. Perception, 18 (5) 657-665.
• 6: Jiandong Liang , Chris Shaw , Mark Green, On temporal-spatial realism in the virtual reality environment, Proceedings of the 4th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, p.19-25, November 11-13, 1991, Hilton Head, South Carolina, United States [doi>10.1145/120782.120784]
• 7: Michael McKenna, Interactive viewpoint control and three-dimensional operations, Proceedings of the 1992 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics, p.53-56, June 1992, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States [doi>10.1145/147156.147163]
• 8: George G. Robertson , Jock D. Mackinlay , Stuart K. Card, Cone Trees: animated 3D visualizations of hierarchical information, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Reaching through technology, p.189-194, April 27-May 02, 1991, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States [doi>10.1145/108844.108883]
• 9: Shepard, R.N. and Metzler, J. (1971) Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701-703.
• 10: Smith, K.U. (1962) Delayed sensory feedback and behavior, W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia.
• 11: Sollenberger, R.L., and Milgram, P. (1991) A comparative study of rotational and sterex~seopie computer graphics depth cues. PrOngs of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting, San Fancisco, 1452-1456.
• 12: Sutherland, I. (1968) A head-mounted three dimensional display. Fall Joint Computer Conference, AFIPS Conference Proceedings, 33, 757-764.
• 13: WaUach, H. and O'Connell, D.H, (1953) The depth effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 205-217.
• 14: Leonard C. Wanger , James A. Ferwerda , Donald P. Greenberg, Perceiving Spatial Relationships in Computer-Generated Images, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, v.12 n.3, p.44-51, 54-58, May 1992 [doi>10.1109/38.135913]
• 15: Mark Ward , Ronald Azuma , Robert Bennett , Stefan Gottschalk , Henry Fuchs, A demonstrated optical tracker with scalable work area for head-mounted display systems, Proceedings of the 1992 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics, p.43-52, June 1992, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States [doi>10.1145/147156.147162]

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES
      H.1.2 User/Machine Systems
          Subjects: Human factors

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
          Subjects: Input devices and strategies (e.g., mouse, touchscreen); Interaction styles (e.g., commands, menus, forms, direct manipulation)

  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.3 COMPUTER GRAPHICS
      I.3.7 Three-Dimensional Graphics and Realism
          Subjects: Virtual reality

General Terms:
Design, Human Factors

Keywords:
head coupled displays, scientific visualization, stereopsis, virtual reality