An actor dependency model of organizational work

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	G. R. Barber, Office Semantics, Ph.D. Dissertation, Dept. of Elec. Eng. and Comp. Sci., M.I.T., 1982.
	2	A. Borgida, S. Greenspan, J. Mylopoulos, Knowledge Representation as the Basis for Requirements Specifications, IEEE Computer, April 1985, pp. 82-91.
	3	J. A. Bubenko, Information Modeling in the Context of System Development, Proc. IFIP, pp. 395-411, 1980.
	4	C. Castelfranchi, M. Miceli, and A. Cesta, Dependence Relations Among Autonomous Agents, Decentralized A.I. - 3 (Proc. 3rd European Workshop on Modeling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-Agent World), Elsevier, 1992.
	5	Kyungwha Lawrence Chung, Representing and using non-functional requirements: a process-oriented approach, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont., Canada, 1993
	6	Philip R. Cohen , Hector J. Levesque, Intention is choice with commitment, Artificial Intelligence, v.42 n.2-3, p.213-261, March 1990 [doi>10.1016/0004-3702(90)90055-5]
	7	W. B. Croft and L. S. Lefkowitz, A Goal-Based Representation of Office Work, Office Knowledge: Representation, Management, and Utilization, W. Lamersdorf (ed.), Elsevier, 1988, pp. 99-124.
	8	P. R. Crosby, Quality is Free, MacGraw-Hill, 1979.
	9	P. de Jong, Ubik: A Framework for the Development of Distributed Organizations, Ph.D. Dissertation, Dept. of Elec. Eng. and Comp. Sci., M.I.T., 1989.
	10	E. Dubois, J. Hagelstein, E. Lahou, F. Ponsaert and A. Rifaut, A Knowledge Representation Language for Requirements Engineering, Proc. IEEE, 74 (10), pp. 1431 -1444, Oct. 1986.
	11	Thomas H. Davenport, Process innovation: reengineering work through information technology, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 1993
	12	The Search for the Organization of Tomorrow, Fortune Magazine, May 18, 1992, pp. 93-98.
	13	Les Gasser, The integration of computing and routine work, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), v.4 n.3, p.205-225, July 1986 [doi>10.1145/214427.214429]
	14	Sol Jaffe Greenspan, Requirements modeling: a knowledge representation approach to software requirements definition, 1984
	15	M. Hammer, Reengineering Work: Don't Automate, Obliterate, Harvard Business Review, July-August 1990, pp. 104-112.
	16	H. J. Harrington, Business Process Improvement: the breakthrough strategy for total quality, productivity, and competitiveness, MacGraw-Hill, 1991.
	17	M. A Jackson, System development (Prentice-Hall International series in computer science), Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1983
	18	M. Jarke , J. Mylopoulos , J. W. Schmidt , Y. Vassiliou, DAIDA: an environment for evolving information systems, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), v.10 n.1, p.1-50, Jan. 1992 [doi>10.1145/128756.128757]
	19	Peter G. W. Keen, Information systems and organizational change, Communications of the ACM, v.24 n.1, p.24-33, Jan. 1981 [doi>10.1145/358527.358543]
	20	Peter G. W. Keen, Shaping the future: business design through information technology, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 1991
	21	R. Kling, Defining the boundaries of computing across complex organizations, Critical issues in information systems research, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1987
	22	J. Lee and K.-Y. Lai, What's In Design Rationale? Human-Computer Interaction vol. 6, no. 3, 1991, pp. 251-280.
	23	Yves Lesperance, A formal theory of indexical knowledge and action, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont., Canada, 1992
	24	Thomas W. Malone, Modeling coordination in organizations and markets, Management Science, v.33 n.10, p.1317-1332, October 1, 1987 [doi>10.1287/mnsc.33.10.1317]
	25	John Mylopoulos , Alex Borgida , Matthias Jarke , Manolis Koubarakis, Telos: representing knowledge about information systems, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), v.8 n.4, p.325-362, Oct. 1990 [doi>10.1145/102675.102676]
	26	J. Mylopoulos, Representing Knowledge About Information Systems, Intl. Workshop on Development of h~telligeat Information Systems, Niagaraon-the-Lake, Ontario, Canada, April 21-23, 1991, pp. 94-96.
	27	John Mylopoulos , Lawrence Chung , Brian Nixon, Representing and using nonfunctional requirements: a process-oriented approach, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.18 n.6, p.488-497, June 1992
	28	N. J. Nilsson, Principles of artificial intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, 1980
	29	J. F. Rockart and J. E. Short, The Networked Organization and the Management of Interdependence, The Corporatio~ of the 1990's - Informatio~ Tech~ology aT~d Organizatim~al Transformation, M. Scott Morton, ed., 1991.
	30	August-Wilhelm Scheer, Enterprise-Wide Data Modelling, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus, NJ, 1989
	31	Lucy A. Suchman, Office procedure as practical action: models of work and system design, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), v.1 n.4, p.320-328, Oct. 1983 [doi>10.1145/357442.357445]
	32	Don Tapscott , Art Caston, Paradigm shift: the new promise of information technology, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY, 1993
	33	B. Thomas, Y. Shoham, A. Schwartz, and S. Kraus, Preliminary Thoughts on an Agent Description Language, Intl. J. Intell. Sys., Vol. 6, 1991, pp. 498~508.
	34	Carson Chia Siang Woo , F. Lochovsky, An object-oriented model for supporting office work, 1988
	35	E. Yu, Modelling Organizations for information Systems Requirements Engineering, Proceedings of First iEEE ,_qymposium on Requireme~ts Engi~eering, San Diego, Calif., 1993, pp. 34-41.
	36	E. Yu, An Organization Modelling Framework for Multi-Perspective Information System Design, in Requirements Engineering 1993: Selected Papers, J. Mylopoulos et al., eds., Univ. of Toronto Dept. of Comp. Sci. Tech. Rpt. DKBS-TR-93-2, July 1993.
	37	E. Yu, A~ Organization Modellir~g Framework for information Systems Requirements Engineeri~g, Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Toronto, forthcoming.