ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Lower bounds for PAC learning with queries
Full text PdfPdf (776 KB)
Source Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory archive
Proceedings of the sixth annual conference on Computational learning theory table of contents
Santa Cruz, California, United States
Pages: 384 - 391  
Year of Publication: 1993
ISBN:0-89791-611-5
Author
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 15,   Downloads (12 Months): 28,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/168304.168382
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
H. Aizenstein, L. ttellerstein, L. Pitt (1992): Read-thrice DNF is hard to learn with membership and eqmvalence queries, 33. FOCS (1992), 523-532.
 
2
 
3
4
5
 
6
7
 
8
B. Bollob/z (1985): Random Graphs, Academic Press (19ss).
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
D. Hauuler (1990): Probably approximately correct learning, Eighth National AI Conference, AAAI'90 (1990), 1101-1108.
 
14
 
15
W. Maa~, Gy. Turin (1989): On the complexity of learning with counterexamples, 30. FOCS (1989), 262-267.
 
16
W. Muss, Gy. Turin (1990}: On the complexity of learning from counterexaanples and membership queries, 31. FOCS (1990), 203-210.
 
17
 
18
S. Muggleton, ed. (1992): Inductive Logic Programming, Academic Press (1992).
 
19
 
20
A. R/nyi (1970): Foundations of Probability, Holden-Day (197o).
 
21
22