ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
State of the art in parallel simulation
Full text PdfPdf (913 KB)
Source Winter Simulation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 24th conference on Winter simulation table of contents
Arlington, Virginia, United States
Pages: 246 - 254  
Year of Publication: 1992
ISBN:0-7803-0798-4
Authors
Sponsors
ASA : American Statistical Association
NIST : National Institue of Standards & Technology
IEEE-CS : Computer Society
IEEE-SMCS : Systems, Man & Cybernetics Society
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
ORSA : Operations Research Society of America
SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
TIMS :
IIE : Institute of Industrial Engineers
SCS : Society for Computer Simulation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 50,   Citation Count: 12
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/167293.167344
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Ammar and Deng, 1991. Time warp simulation using time scale decomposition, pages 11-24. SCS Simulation Series, Jan. 1991.
 
3
Ayani, 1989. A parallel simulation scheme based on the distance between objects. Proceedings of the SCS Multiconference on Distributed Simulation, 21(2):113-118, March 1989.
4
 
5
Ball and Hoyt, 1990. The adaptive Time-Warp concurrency control algorithm. Proceedings of the SCS Multiconference on Distributed Simulation, 22(1)'.174-177, January 1990.
 
6
Bellenot, 1992. State skipping performance with the time warp operating system. In 6ch Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Simulation,
 
7
Berkman and Ayani, 1991. Parallel simulation of multistage interconnection networks on a sired computer, pages 133-140. SCS Simulation Series, Jan. 1991.
 
8
Boukerche and Tropper, 1991. A performance analysis of distributed simulation with clustered processes, pages 112-124. SCS Simulation Series, Jan. 1991.
 
9
 
10
Buzzell et al., 1990. Modular VME rollback hardware for Time Warp. Proceedings of the SCS Multiconference on Distributed Simulation, 22(1):153-156, January 1990.
 
11
Cai and Turner, 1990. An algorithm for distributed discrete-event simulation- the "carrier null message" approach. Proceedings of the SCS Multiconference on Distributed Simulation, 22(1):3-8, January 1990.
 
12
Chandy and Misra, 1979. Distributed simulation: A case study in design and verification of distributed programs. IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering, 5(5):440-452, September 1979.
 
13
Chandy and Sherman, 1989a. The conditional event approach to distributed simulation. Proceedings of the SCS Multiconference on Distributed Simulation, 21(2):93-99, March 1989.
 
14
Chandy and Sherman, 1989b. Space, time, and simulation. Proceedings of the SCS Multiconference on Distributed Simulation, 21(2):53-57, March 1989.
 
15
Chandy, 1975. A survey of analytic models of rollback and recovery strategies. 1EEE Computer, 8(5):40-47, May 1975.
 
16
 
17
Corporation, 1983. Zyead Corporation. The Zycad Logic Evaluator: Product Description. Zycad Corp., Roseville Mn., 1983.
 
18
Cote and Tropper, 1992. On distributed and pseudosimulation. In 6th Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Simulation,
 
19
 
20
21
 
22
Eick et at., 1991. Synchronous relaxation for parallel simulations with applications to circuit-switched networks, pages 151-162. SCS Simulation Series, Jan. 1991.
 
23
Felderman and Kleinrock, 1990. An upper bound on the improvement of asynchronous versus sychronous distributed processing. Simulation Series, Jan. 1990.
24
 
25
Felderman and Kleinrock, 1991b. Two processor time warp analysis: Some results on a unifying approach, pages 3-10. SCS Simulation Series, Jan. 1991.
 
26
Felderman and Kleinrock, 1992. Two processor conservative simulation analysis. In 6th Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Simulation,
 
27
Franklin et al., 1984. Parallel machines and algorithms for discrete-event simulation. Proceedings of the 198~ International Conference on Parallel Processing, pages 449-458, August 1984.
 
28
 
29
30
31
 
32
Gafni, 1988. Rollback mechanisms for optimistic distributed simulation systems. Proceedings of the SCS Multiconference on Distributed Simulation, 19(3):61-67, July 1988.
 
33
Gaujal et aL, 1992. A sweep algorithm for massively parallel simulation of circuit-switched networks. Technical Report ICASE Technical Report 92-30, ICASE, July 1992.
34
 
35
 
36
Ghosh and Fujimoto, 1991. Parallel discrete event simulation using space-time memory. Proceedings of the 1991 International Conference on Parallel Processing, Vol. 3, 3:201-208, August 1991.
 
37
38
 
39
 
40
Heidelberger and Nicol, 1991. Conservative parallel simuation of continuous time markov chains using uniformization. Technical Report IBM Research Report RC-16780, IBM Research Division, April 1991.
 
41
Heidelberger and Stone, 1990. Parallel trace-driven ve~h~ elmul~t~on by t~me par~i~ionln8_ Technical Report RC 15500, IBM Research, February 1990.
42
43
 
44
 
45
Lin and Lazowska, 1990a. Optimality considerations of "time warp" parallel simu}{ation. Simulation Series, Jan. 1990.
 
46
Lin and Lazowska, 1990b. Reducing the state saving overhead for Time Warp parallel simulation. Technical Report 90-02-03, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, February 1990.
 
47
Lin and Lazowska, 1991a. Processor scheduling for time warp parallel simulation, pages 11-14. SCS Simulation Series, Jan. 1991.
48
49
 
50
Lin et al., 1990. Conservative parallel simulation for systems with no lookahead prediction. Proceedings of the SCS Multiconference on Distributed Simulation, 22(1):144-149, January 1990.
 
51
Lin, 1992. Y.-B. Lin. Memory management algorithms for optimistic parallel simulation. In 6~h Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Simulation,
 
52
Lipton and Mizell, 1990. Time Warp vs. Chandy-Misra: A worst-ease comparison. Simulation Series, Jan. 1990.
53
54
55
 
56
Madisetti et al., 1992. The mimdix operating system for parallel simulation. In 6th Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Simulation,
 
57
Reynolds, Jr., 1991. An efficient framework for parallel simulations, pages 167-174. SCS Simulation Series, Jan. 1991.
 
58
Nandy and Loucks, 1992. An algorithm for partitioning and mapping conservative parallel simulation onto multicomputers. In 6~h Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Simulation,
 
59
Nicol and Heidelberger, 1992. Optimistic parallel simuation of continuous time markov chains using uniformization. Technical Report IBM Research Report RC- 17932, IBM Research Division, April 1992.
 
60
Nicol and Reynolds, 1985. D.M. Nicol and P.F. Reynolds, Jr. A statistical approach to dynamic partitioning. Simulation Series, 1985.
 
61
 
62
Nicol et al., 1992. Massively parallel algorithms for trace-driven cache simulation. In 6th Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Simulation,
 
63
64
 
65
Pancerella, 1992. Improving the efficiency of a framework for parallel simulations. In 6th Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Simulation,
 
66
 
67
 
68
Preiss et al., 1991. Null message cancellation in conservative distributed simulation, pages 33-38. SCS Simulation Series, Jan. 1991.
 
69
Preiss et al., 1992. On the trade-off between time and space in optimistic parallel discrete-event simulation. In 6th Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Simulation,
 
70
 
71
Steinman, 1991. Speedes:synehronous parallel environment for emulation and discrete event simulation, pages 95-103. SCS Simulation Series, Jan. 1991.
 
72
Su and Seitz, 1989. Variants of the Chandy-Misra-Bryant distributed discrete-event simulation algorithm. Proceedings of lhe SCS Multiconference on Distributed Simulation, 21(2):38-43, March 1989.
 
73
 
74
Turner and Xu, 1992. Performance evaluation of the bounded time warp algorithm. In 6th Workshop on Parallel and Dislributed Simulation,

CITED BY  12

Collaborative Colleagues:
Richard Fujimoto: colleagues
David Nicol: colleagues