ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Software usability: choosing appropriate methods for evaluating online systems and documentation
Full text PdfPdf (1.19 MB)
Source ACM Special Interest Group for Design of Communication archive
Proceedings of the 11th annual international conference on Systems documentation table of contents
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Pages: 209 - 222  
Year of Publication: 1993
ISBN:0-89791-630-1
Author
Sponsor
SIGDOC: ACM Special Interest Group for Design of Communications
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 35,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/166025.166083
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Bal~ie, E. R. (1973). Survey Research Mettuxts. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
 
3
Babbie, E. R. (1975). The Practice of $~al Research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
 
4
Blyler, N.R. (1989). Purpose and Professional Writers, The Technical Writing Teacher, 16 (I), 52-67.
 
5
Bond, S. J. (1985). Protocol-Aided Revision: A Tool for Making Documents Usable. AEP Conference Pa/~. Alexandria, VA: IBM Academic Information Systems.
 
6
Brenner, M., Brown, J., & Canter, D. (Eds.). (1985). The Research Interview: Uses and Approaches. NY, NY: Academic P.
 
7
Brown, J. & Canter, D. (1985). The Uses of Explanation in the Research Interview. The Research interview: Uses and Approaches. M. Brenner, J. Brown, & D. Canter (Eds.). NY, NY: Academic P, 217-245.
 
8
 
9
 
10
Carroll, J. M. & Rosson, M. B. (1985). Usability Specifications as a Tool in Iterative Develop- ~t. Adtxmces in Human-C~ter Interaction. H. R. Hartson (Ed.). Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1-28.
 
11
Cooper, M. & Holzman, M. (1983). Talking AboutProtocx)ls. CoilegeCom~tionand Communication, 34 (3), 284-296.
 
12
 
13
Dieli, M. (1986). Designing Successful ~- ments: An Investigation of Document Evaluation Methods. Unpublished Dc~toral Dissertation. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon.
 
14
Dillard, J. D. (1992). MaximizingDocumentation Usability and Product Quality Through Structured Rapid Prototyping. P~ings of the 38 th international Technical Communication Conference. Arlington, VA: Sc~ety for Technical Communication, 119-122.
 
15
Doheny-Farina, S. & Odell, L. (1985). Ethnographic Research on Writing: Assumptions and Methodology. Writing in Nonacad~ Settings. L. Odell & D. Goswami (Eds.). London, England: }'he Guilford P, 503-534.
 
16
 
17
Duffy, T. M., Palmer, J. E., Gomoll, T., GomoU, K.,& Aaron, A. (1988). WritingOnlineInformation: Expert Strategies (Int~s with Professional Writers). Pittsburgh, PA: Communications Design Center Technical Report, Carnegie Mellon.
 
18
 
19
Ericsson, K. A. & Sin~n, H.A. (1980). Verbal Reports as Data. Psychotogi~ Rerdew, 87, 215- 251.
 
20
Ericsson, K. A. &Simon, H.A. (1984). Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. Cambridge, MA: M1T P.
 
21
Faigley, L (1985). Nonacademic Writing: The~Perspective. Writingin Nonacademic Settings~ L. Odell & D. Goswami (Eds.). London, England: The Guilford P, 231-248.
 
22
Fink, A. & K~ff, J. (1985). How to Conduct Surveys.' A Step-by-Step Guide. Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
 
23
Rower, L. (1989). Cognition, Context, and ~ryBuilding. CoilegeCompvsi~na~ CommurdcLation, 40 (3), 282-311.
 
24
Goubfl~rell, P. (1992). A Practitioner's Guide to Research Methods. Techn~ Communication, 39 (4), 582-591.
 
25
Hackos, J. T. (1992). Establishing Quality Benc~~ for Technical Publications. Proce~ings of the 38 th Internaffonal Technical Communication Conference. Arlington, VA: Society for Technical Communication, 684-685.
 
26
Hartley, J. R. & Smith, M. (1988). Question Answering and Explanation Givingin Online Help Systems. Arh~ffal lntdligence and Human Learning: Intelligent Computer-Aided Instruction. J. Self (Ed.). London, England: Chapman and Hall, 338-360.
 
27
Hayes, J. R. & Ftower, L. S. (1983)o Uncovering Cognitive Processes in Writing: An Introdue tion to Protocol Analysis. Research in Writing: Pr/nc/p/es and M~. P. Mosenthal, I_ Tan~r, andS. Walmsey ~). NY, NY: Lo~, 207o 22ff
 
28
Hayes, J. R., Watem-,an, D. A., & Robinson, C. S. (1977). Identifying the Relevant Aspects of a Problem Text. C0gn/~ Sdence, 1 (3), 297-313.
29
 
30
 
31
Lewis, B. C. &Crews, A. E~ (1985). The Evolution of Benchmarking as a Computer Evaluation Technique. MIS Quarterly/March, 7-16.
 
32
Lewis, C. (1982). Using the "Thlnldng-aloud' Method in Cognitive Interface Design~ Research Report-9265-40713. Yorktown Heights, NY: IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, 1-6.
 
33
Liebried, K. H~ & McNair, C. J. (1992). Benchmarh'ng: A Tool for Continuous Improvement. NY, NY: Harper Collins.
 
34
MacNealy, M. S. (1992). Research in Technical Communieation: A View of the Past and a Challenge for the Future. T~r, hn~ Communicat/on, 39 (4), 533-551.
 
35
36
 
37
Mehlenbacher, B. (1992b). Rhetorical Moves in Scienh~'ic P~l Writing: A Case Study From BiochemicaI E ngi~n g. Unpublis~ ~ral Dissertation. Pittsburgh, PA:CarnegieMeUon.
38
39
 
40
Mehlenbacher, B. & Miller, C. R. (1993). Establishing the Role of Research in a Master's- Level Technical Communication Program. 20th Annual Meeting of the Council for Programs in Techrdcal and Scientt~zc Communication Paper. Charlotte, NC: U of NC at Charlotte.
 
41
Mosier, J. N. & Smith, S. L. (1986). Application of Guidelines for Designing User interface Software. BOuwiour and Information T~h~logy, 5, 39-46.
 
42
Mostyn, B. (1985). The Content Analysis of Qualitative Research Data: A Dynamic Approach. The Research Intervitw: Uses and Approaches. M. Brenner, J. Brown, & D. Canter (Eds.). NY, NY: Academic P, 115-145.
 
43
 
44
OdeU, L., Goswami, D., & Herrington, A. (1983). The Discourse-based Interview: A Proc~ure for Exploring the Tacit Knowledge of Writers in Nonacademic Settings. Resmrch on Writing: Principles and Methods. P. Mosenthal, L. Tan'~r, & S. Walrnsley (Eds.). NY, NY: Lon~ 221-235.
 
45
Ong, W. J. (1982). Orality and Literacy: The T~r, hnologizing of the Word. NY, NY: Methuen.
 
46
Pemias, A. (1989)./dins and lnfvrma~' Managing in a High-Tath World. NY, NY: Sin~n & Schuster.
 
47
Pinelli, T. E. & Bardey, R. O. (Guest Eds.) (1992). Special Issue: Research in Technical Communication. Technical Communication,39 (4),524-525.
 
48
Potter, J. & Mulkay, M. (1985). Scientists' Interview Talk: Interviews as a Technique for Revealing Participants' Interpretative Pracrices. The Research Interview: Uses and Approaches. M. Brenner, J. Brown, & D. Canter (Eds.). NY, NY: Academic P, 247-271.
 
49
Piela, P., McKelvey, R., & Mehlenbacher, B. (1991). Integrating Usability and Participatory Design into Basic Engineering Design Research. Engineering Design Research Center Technical Report. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon.
 
50
Plumb, C. & Spyridakis, J. H. (1992). Survey Research in Technical Communication: E~ signing and Administrating Questionnaires. T~hnic~ Communication, 39 (4), 625-6,38.
 
51
Robertson, S. & Swartz, M. (1988). Whydo we ask Ourselves Questions? Questioning Exchange, 2 (1), 47-51.
 
52
Schell, D. A. (1986). Testing Online and Print User ~mentation. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, PC-29 (4), 87-92.
 
53
Schriver, K. A. (1984). Revising Computer Documentation for Comprehension: Ten Exercises in Protocol-Aided Revision. Communications Design Center Technical ~t #14. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon.
 
54
Schriver, K. A. (1989). Evaluating Text Qualit),: The Continuum From Text-Focused to Reader-Focused Mettx~s. IE EE Transactions on Professional Communication, 32 (4), Z38-255.
 
55
Schriver, K. A. (1993). Quality in Document Design: issues and Controversies. T~hn~ Communication, 40 (2), 239-257.
 
56
Schriver, K. A. & Mehlenbacher, B. (1989). Predicting Readers' Problems With Text. HyperCard2.0TM Alpha Versionof Schriver(1984). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon.
 
57
Sellen, A. & Nicol, A. (1990). Building User- Centered Online Help. The Art of Human- Computer Interface Design. B. Laurel (Ed. ). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 143-154.
 
58
Skelton, T. M. (1992). Testing the Usability of Usability Testing. T~r, hn~ Communication, 39 (3), 343-359.
 
59
Smith, S. L. & Mosier, J. N. (1984). Des/gn Guidelines for User-System Interface Software. Technical Report ESD-TR-84-190, NTIS # AD A 154 909. Hansom Air Force Base, MA: USAF Electronic Systems Division.
 
60
Steinberg, E. R. (1986). Protocols, Retrospective Reports, and the Stream of Consciousness. College English, 48, 697-712.
 
61
Sullivan, P. & Spilka, R. (1992). Qualitative Research in Technical Communication: issues of Value, Identity, and Use. T~hn~ Communication, 39 (4), 592-606.
 
62
Swarts, H.,Flower, L S.,& Hayes, J.R. (1984). Designing Protocol Studies of the Writing Process: An Introduction. New Directions in Compo~'~ ~m~. R. Beach & L. S. Bridwell (Eds.)o London, England: Guilford P, 53-71.
 
63
 
64
Walker, J. H. (1987). Issues and Strategies for Online Documentation. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, PC 30, 235-248.
 
65
Wright, P. (1979). Quality Control Aspects of Doom~nt Design. Information Design Journal, 1,3342.
 
66
Wright, P. (1980). Usability: The Criterion for Designing Written Information. Processing Visible Language, Vol. 2. P~ A. Koler, M. E. Wrolstad, & Ho Bouma (Eds.). NY, NY: Plenum P, 183-206.

CITED BY  6