ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The condition specification: revisiting its role within a hierarchy of simulation model specifications
Full text PdfPdf (1.04 MB)
Source ACM SIGSIM Simulation Digest archive
Volume 22 ,  Issue 3  (March 1993) table of contents
Pages: 11 - 33  
Year of Publication: 1993
ISSN:0163-6103
Author
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 3,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/165347.165351
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The past decade of research in simulation modeling methodology has seen a growing appreciation and understanding of the importance of both the process and product of model representation (commonly referred to as model specification). This article presents a brief discussion of the evolving role of one simulation model specification language, the condition specification, within an environment approach to simulation model development and support.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
Balci, O., and Nance, R. E. (1987). "Simulation Model Development Environments: A Research Prototype," <i>Journal of the Operational Research Society</i>, <b>38</b>(8), pp. 753--763.
 
4
 
5
Cota, B. A. and Sargent, R. G. (1990). "Simulation Algorithms for Control Flow Graph Models," CASE Center Technical Report 9023, Simulation Research Group and CASE Center, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, November.
 
6
Cota, B. A. and Sargent, R. G. (1990). "Control Flow Graphs: A Method of Model Representation for Parallel Discrete Event Simulation," CASE Center Technical Report 9026, Simulation Research Group and CASE Center, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, December.
7
 
8
Lin, Y-B., (1990). "Understanding the Limits of Optimistic and Conservative Parallel Simulation," Technical Report 90-08-02, Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, August.
 
9
Lin, Y-B., Lazowska, E. D., and Baer, J-L. (1990). "Conservative Parallel Simulation for Systems With No Lookahead Prediction," In: <i>Distributed Simulation</i>, SCS <b>22</b>(1), pp. 144--149, January.
10
 
11
Nance, R. E. (1981). "Model Representation in Discrete Event Simulation: The Conical Methodology," Technical Report CS81003-R, Department of Computer Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, March.
12
 
13
Nance, R. E., and Overstreet C. M. (1988). "Diagnostic Assistance Using Digraph Representations of Discrete Event Simulation Model Specifications," <i>Transactions of the Society for Computer Simulation</i>, The Society for Computer Simulation, <b>4</b>(1), pp. 33--57.
 
14
Nicol, D. M., and Fujimoto, R. (1993). "Parallel Simulation Today," To appear in: <i>Annals of Operations Research</i>, Special Volume on Simulation and Modeling.
 
15
16
 
17
Puthoff, F. A. (1991). "The Model Analyzer: Prototyping the Diagnosis of Discrete-Event Simulation Model Specification," M. S. Thesis, Department of Computer Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, September.