ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
LoOP: local outlier probabilities
Full text PdfPdf (532 KB)
Source
Conference on Information and Knowledge Management archive
Proceeding of the 18th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management table of contents
Hong Kong, China
POSTER SESSION: Poster session 4: KM track table of contents
Pages: 1649-1652  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-512-3
Authors
Hans-Peter Kriegel  Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, München, Germany
Peer Kröger  Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, München, Germany
Erich Schubert  Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, München, Germany
Arthur Zimek  Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, München, Germany
Sponsors
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 14,   Downloads (12 Months): 44,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1645953.1646195
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Many outlier detection methods do not merely provide the decision for a single data object being or not being an outlier but give also an outlier score or "outlier factor" signaling "how much" the respective data object is an outlier. A major problem for any user not very acquainted with the outlier detection method in question is how to interpret this "factor" in order to decide for the numeric score again whether or not the data object indeed is an outlier. Here, we formulate a local density based outlier detection method providing an outlier "score" in the range of [0, 1] that is directly interpretable as a probability of a data object for being an outlier.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
A. Asuncion and D. J. Newman. UCI Machine Learning Repository. http://www.ics.uci.edu/~mlearn/MLRepository.html, 2007.
4
 
5
H.-P. Kriegel, P. Kröger, and A. Zimek. Outlier detection techniques. Tutorial at PAKDD, 2009.
6
 
7
B. Liebl, U. Nennstiel-Ratzel, R. von Kries, R. Fingerhut, B. Olgemöller, A. Zapf, and A. A. Roscher. Very high compliance in an expanded MS-MS-based newborn screening program despite written parental consent. Preventive Medicine, 34(2):127--131, 2002.
 
8
S. Papadimitriou, H. Kitagawa, P. Gibbons, and C. Faloutsos. LOCI: Fast outlier detection using the local correlation integral. In Proc. ICDE, 2003.
9
 
10

Collaborative Colleagues:
Hans-Peter Kriegel: colleagues
Peer Kröger: colleagues
Erich Schubert: colleagues
Arthur Zimek: colleagues