ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
A unified relevance model for opinion retrieval
Full text PdfPdf (437 KB)
Source
Conference on Information and Knowledge Management archive
Proceeding of the 18th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management table of contents
Hong Kong, China
SESSION: IR domain-specific retrieval I table of contents
Pages: 947-956  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-512-3
Authors
Xuanjing Huang  Fudan University, Shanghai, China
W. Bruce Croft  University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA
Sponsors
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 52,   Downloads (12 Months): 128,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1645953.1646075
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Representing the information need is the greatest challenge for opinion retrieval. Typical queries for opinion retrieval are composed of either just content words, or content words with a small number of cue "opinion" words. Both are inadequate for retrieving opinionated documents. In this paper, we develop a general formal framework--the opinion relevance model--to represent an information need for opinion retrieval. We explore a series of methods to automatically identify the most appropriate opinion words for query expansion, including using query independent sentiment resources. We also propose a relevance feedback-based approach to extract opinion words. Both query-independent and query-dependent methods can also be integrated into a more effective mixture relevance model. Finally, opinion retrieval experiments are presented for the Blog06 and COAE08 text collections. The results show that, significant improvements can always be obtained by this opinion relevance model whether sentiment resources are available or not.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
G. Amati, E. Ambrosi, M. Bianchi, C. Gaibisso, and G. Gambosi. FUB, IASI-CNR and University of Tor Vergata at TREC 2007 Blog Track. In Proceedings of the 15th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2007), 2007.
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
D. Hannah, C. Macdonald, J. Peng, B. He, and I. Ounis. University of Glasgow at TREC 2007: Experiments in Blog and Enterprise Tracks with Terrier. In Proceedings of the 15th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2007), 2007.
 
6
7
 
8
S. Kullback and R. A. Leibler. On information and sufficiency. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 22(1):79--86, 1951.
9
10
11
 
12
C. Macdonald and I. Ounis. The TREC Blogs06 collection: creating and analysing a blog test collection. Technical Report TR-2006-224, University of Glasgow, 2006.
 
13
C. Macdonald and I. Ounis. Overview of the TREC-2007 Blog Track. In Proceedings of the 15th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2007), 2007.
14
 
15
 
16
D. Oard, T. Elsayed, J. Wang, Y. Wu, P. Zhang, E. Abels, J. Lin, and D. Soergel. TREC-2006 at Maryland: Blog, Enterprise, Legal and QA Tracks. In Proceedings of the 15th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2006), 2006.
 
17
I. Ounis, C. Macdonald, and I. Soboroff. On the TREC Blog Track. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM), 2008.
 
18
I. Ounis, C. Macdonald, and I. Soboroff. Overview of the TREC-2008 Blog Track. In Proceedings of the 16th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2008), 2008.
 
19
 
20
 
21
22
23
24
 
25
O. Vechtomova. Using subjective adjectives in opinion retrieval from blogs. In Proceedings of the 15th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2007), 2007.
 
26
J. Wiebe, T. Wilson, and C. Cardie. Annotating expressions of opinions and emotions in language. Language Resources and Evaluation (formerly Computers and the Humanities), 39(2/3):164--210, 2005.
27
28
 
29
W. Zhang and C. Yu. UIC at TREC 2007 Blog Track. In Proceedings of the 15th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2007), 2007.
 
30
J. Zhao, H. Xu, X. Huang, S. Tan, K. Liu, and Q. Zhang. Overview of Chinese Opinion Analysis Evaluation 2008. In Proceedings of the First Chinese Opinion Analysis Evaluation, 2008.
 
31
G. Zhou, H. Joshi, and C. Bayrak. Topic categorization for relevancy and opinion detection. In Proceedings of the 15th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2007), 2007.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Xuanjing Huang: colleagues
W. Bruce Croft: colleagues