Take a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.

ABSTRACT

A primary motivation for our research in digital ecosystems is the desire to exploit the self-organising properties of biological ecosystems. Ecosystems are thought to be robust, scalable architectures that can automatically solve complex, dynamic problems. However, the computing technologies that contribute to these properties have not been made explicit in digital ecosystems research. Here, we discuss how different computing technologies can contribute to providing the necessary self-organising features, including Multi-Agent Systems (MASs), Service-Oriented Architectures (SOAs), and distributed evolutionary computing (DEC). The potential for exploiting these properties in digital ecosystems is considered, suggesting how several key features of biological ecosystems can be exploited in Digital Ecosystems, and discussing how mimicking these features may assist in developing robust, scalable self-organising architectures. An example architecture, the Digital Ecosystem, is considered in detail. The Digital Ecosystem is then measured experimentally through simulations, considering the self-organised diversity of its evolving agent populations relative to the user request behaviour.

REFERENCES

• 1: M. Begon, J. Harper, and C. Townsend. Ecology: Individuals, Populations and Communities. Blackwell Publishing, 1996.
• 2: G. Briscoe. Digital Ecosystems. PhD thesis, Imperial College London, 2009.
• 3: G. Briscoe, M. Chli, and M. Vidal. Creating a Digital Ecosystem: Service-oriented architectures with distributed evolutionary computing (BOF-0759). In JavaOne Conference. Sun Microsystems, 2006.
• 4: Gerard Briscoe , Philippe De Wilde, Digital ecosystems: evolving service-orientated architectures, Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Bio inspired models of network, information and computing systems, December 11-13, 2006, Cavalese, Italy [doi>10.1145/1315843.1315864]
• 5: G. Briscoe and S. Sadedin. Digital Business Ecosystems: Natural science paradigms. In F. Nachira, A. Nicolai, P. Dini, M. Le Louarn, and L. Rivera León, editors, Digital Business Ecosystems, pages 48--55. European Commission, 2007.
• 6: G. Briscoe, S. Sadedin, and G. Paperin. Biology of applied digital ecosystems. In Digital Ecosystems and Technologies Conference, pages 458--463. IEEE Press, 2007.
• 7: L. Cabral, J. Domingue, E. Motta, T. Payne, and F. Hakimpour. Approaches to semantic web services: an overview and comparisons. In The Semantic Web: Research and Applications, pages 225--239. Springer, 2004.
• 8: E. Cantu-Paz. A survey of parallel genetic algorithms. Réseaux et systèmes répartis, Calculateurs Parallèles, 10:141--171, 1998.
• 9: J. Cardoso and A. Sheth. Introduction to semantic web services and web process composition. In J. Cardoso and A. Sheth, editors, Semantic Web Services and Web Process Composition, pages 1--13. Springer, 2004.
• 10: P. Dini, G. Lombardo, R. Mansell, A. Razavi, S. Moschoyiannis, P. Krause, A. Nicolai, and L. Rivera León. Beyond interoperability to digital ecosystems: regional innovation and socio-economic development led by SMEs. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 1:410--426, 2008.
• 11: D. Green, N. Klomp, G. Rimmington, and S. Sadedin. Complexity in Landscape Ecology. Springer, 2006.
• 12: J. Koza. Overview of genetic programming. In Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection, pages 73--78. MIT, 1992.
• 13: Dirk Krafzig , Karl Banke , Dirk Slama, Enterprise SOA: Service-Oriented Architecture Best Practices (The Coad Series), Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2004
• 14: S. Levin. Ecosystems and the biosphere as complex adaptive systems. Ecosystems, 1:431--436, 1998.
• 15: R. Levins. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America, 15:237--240, 1969.
• 16: F. Leymann, D. Roller, and M. Schmidt. Web services and business process management. IBM Systems Journal, 41:198--211, 2002.
• 17: S. Lin, W. Punch III, and E. Goodman. Coarse-grain parallel genetic algorithms: categorization and new approach. In Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing, pages 28--37. IEEE Press, 1994.
• 18: K. Lyytinen and Y. Yoo. The next wave of nomadic computing: A research agenda for information systems research. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 1:1--20, 2001.
• 19: J. Markoff. Faster chips are leaving programmers in their dust. Technical report, New York Times, 2007.
• 20: F. G. McCabe , K. L. Clark, APRIL—Agent PRocess Interaction Language, Proceedings of the workshop on agent theories, architectures, and languages on Intelligent agents, p.324-340, March 1995, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
• 21: S. McCulloch, R. Kokoska, O. Chilkova, C. Welch, E. Johansson, P. Burgers, and T. Kunkel. Enzymatic switching for efficient and accurate translesion DNA replication. Nucleic Acids Research, 32:4665--4675, 2004.
• 22: G. Modi. Service oriented architecture&web 2.0. Technical report, Guru Tegh Bahadur Institute of Technology, 2007.
• 23: J. Moore. The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems. Harvard Business School Press, 1996.
• 24: Mike P. Papazoglou, Service -Oriented Computing: Concepts, Characteristics and Directions, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering, p.3, December 10-12, 2003
• 25: M. P. Papazoglou , D. Georgakopoulos, Introduction, Communications of the ACM, v.46 n.10, October 2003 [doi>10.1145/944217.944233]
• 26: V. Pham and A. Karmouch. Mobile software agents: an overview. IEEE Communications Magazine, 36:26--37, 1998.
• 27: R. Rivest. The MD5 message-digest algorithm. Technical report, MIT, 1992.
• 28: K. Rothermel and F. Hohl. Mobile agents. In A. Kent and J. Williams, editors, Encyclopedia for Computer Science and Technology, volume 40, pages 155--176. CRC Press, 1999.
• 29: M. Singh and M. Huhns. Service-Oriented Computing: Semantics, Processes, Agents. Wiley, 2005.
• 30: Joachim Stender, Parallel Genetic Algorithms: Theory and Applications, IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1993
• 31: M. Ward. Life offers lessons for business, 2004.
• 32: D. Watts and S. Strogatz. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature, 393:440--442, 1998.
• 33: Douglas R. White , Michael Houseman, The Navigability of strong ties: small worlds, tie strength, and network topology, Complexity, v.8 n.1, p.72-81, September 2002 [doi>10.1002/cplx.10053]

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  C. Computer Systems Organization
  C.2 COMPUTER-COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
      C.2.4 Distributed Systems

Additional Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
        D.2.11 Software Architectures

  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES
      H.1.0 General

Keywords:
distributed evolutionary computing, ecosystem-oriented architectures, multi-agent systems, service-oriented architectures