| Learning to recommend helpful hotel reviews |
| Full text |
Pdf
(475 KB)
|
Source
|
ACM Conference On Recommender Systems
archive
Proceedings of the third ACM conference on Recommender systems
table of contents
New York, New York, USA
SESSION: Short papers
table of contents
Pages 305-308
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-435-5
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsor |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 17, Downloads (12 Months): 17, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
User-generated reviews are a common and valuable source of product information, yet little attention has been paid as to how best to present them to end-users. In this paper, we describe a classification-based recommender system that is designed to recommend the most helpful reviews for a given product. We present a large-scale evaluation of our approach using TripAdvisor hotel reviews, and we show that our approach is capable of suggesting superior reviews compared to a number of alternative recommendation benchmarks.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
S. Baccianella, A. Esuli, and F. Sebastiani. Multi-facet rating of product reviews. In Advances in Information Retrieval, 31th European Conference on Information Retrieval Research (ECIR 2009), April 6--9 2009.
|
| |
2
|
M. Bilgic and R. J. Mooney. Explaining recommendations: Satisfaction vs. promotion. In Beyond Personalization Workshop, held in conjunction with the 2005 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, San Diego, CA, USA, 2005.
|
| |
3
|
T. Fawcett. Roc graphs: Notes and practical considerations for researchers. In Technical Report HPL-2003-4, HP Laboratories, CA, USA, 2004.
|
| |
4
|
F. M. Harper, D. Moy, and J. A. Konstan. Facts or friends? distinguishing informational and conversational questions in social Q&A sites. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'09), pages 759--768, Boston, MA, USA, 2009.
|
| |
5
|
J. L. Herlocker, J. A. Konstan, and J. Riedl. Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations. In Proceeding on the ACM 2000 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pages 241--250, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2000.
|
| |
6
|
S.-M. Kim, P. Pantel, T. Chklovski, , and M. Pennacchiotti. Automatically assessing review helpfulness. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 423--430, Sydney, Australia, July 22--23 2006.
|
| |
7
|
Y. Liu, X. Huang, A. An, and X. Yu. Modeling and predicting the helpfulness of online reviews. In Proceedings of the 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM 2008), pages 443--452, Pisa, Italy, December 15--19 2008.
|
| |
8
|
H. Tang, S. Tan, and X. Cheng. A survey on sentiment detection of reviews. Expert Systems With Applications, 36(7):10760--10773, 2009.
|
| |
9
|
N. Tintarev and J. Masthoff. The effectiveness of personalized movie explanations: An experiment using commercial meta-data. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems (AH 2008), 2008.
|
| |
10
|
W. Weerkamp and M. de Rijke. Credibility improves topical blog post retrieval. In Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics with the Human Language Technology Conference (ACL-08:HLT), pages 923--931, June 16--18 2008.
|
| |
11
|
I. H. Witten and E. Frank. Data Mining -- Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, 2nd Edition. Elsevier, 2005.
|
|