ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Learning to recommend helpful hotel reviews
Full text PdfPdf (475 KB)
Source
ACM Conference On Recommender Systems archive
Proceedings of the third ACM conference on Recommender systems table of contents
New York, New York, USA
SESSION: Short papers table of contents
Pages 305-308  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-435-5
Authors
Michael P. O'Mahony  University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
Barry Smyth  University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
Sponsor
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 17,   Downloads (12 Months): 17,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1639714.1639774
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

User-generated reviews are a common and valuable source of product information, yet little attention has been paid as to how best to present them to end-users. In this paper, we describe a classification-based recommender system that is designed to recommend the most helpful reviews for a given product. We present a large-scale evaluation of our approach using TripAdvisor hotel reviews, and we show that our approach is capable of suggesting superior reviews compared to a number of alternative recommendation benchmarks.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
S. Baccianella, A. Esuli, and F. Sebastiani. Multi-facet rating of product reviews. In Advances in Information Retrieval, 31th European Conference on Information Retrieval Research (ECIR 2009), April 6--9 2009.
 
2
M. Bilgic and R. J. Mooney. Explaining recommendations: Satisfaction vs. promotion. In Beyond Personalization Workshop, held in conjunction with the 2005 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, San Diego, CA, USA, 2005.
 
3
T. Fawcett. Roc graphs: Notes and practical considerations for researchers. In Technical Report HPL-2003-4, HP Laboratories, CA, USA, 2004.
 
4
F. M. Harper, D. Moy, and J. A. Konstan. Facts or friends? distinguishing informational and conversational questions in social Q&A sites. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'09), pages 759--768, Boston, MA, USA, 2009.
 
5
J. L. Herlocker, J. A. Konstan, and J. Riedl. Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations. In Proceeding on the ACM 2000 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pages 241--250, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2000.
 
6
S.-M. Kim, P. Pantel, T. Chklovski, , and M. Pennacchiotti. Automatically assessing review helpfulness. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 423--430, Sydney, Australia, July 22--23 2006.
 
7
Y. Liu, X. Huang, A. An, and X. Yu. Modeling and predicting the helpfulness of online reviews. In Proceedings of the 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM 2008), pages 443--452, Pisa, Italy, December 15--19 2008.
 
8
H. Tang, S. Tan, and X. Cheng. A survey on sentiment detection of reviews. Expert Systems With Applications, 36(7):10760--10773, 2009.
 
9
N. Tintarev and J. Masthoff. The effectiveness of personalized movie explanations: An experiment using commercial meta-data. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems (AH 2008), 2008.
 
10
W. Weerkamp and M. de Rijke. Credibility improves topical blog post retrieval. In Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics with the Human Language Technology Conference (ACL-08:HLT), pages 923--931, June 16--18 2008.
 
11
I. H. Witten and E. Frank. Data Mining -- Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, 2nd Edition. Elsevier, 2005.