ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Adaptive tradeoff explanations in conversational recommenders
Full text PdfPdf (959 KB)
Source
ACM Conference On Recommender Systems archive
Proceedings of the third ACM conference on Recommender systems table of contents
New York, New York, USA
SESSION: Short papers table of contents
Pages 225-228  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-435-5
Author
Li Chen  Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Sponsor
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 18,   Downloads (12 Months): 18,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1639714.1639754
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The completeness and certainty of a user's preferences may vary during her preference construction process in a conversational recommender. In order to more effectively support users to uncover their hidden criteria and/or solve preference conflicts, we propose to generate adaptive tradeoff explanations in organization-based recommender interfaces, to be conditional on the user's contextual needs. An experiment shows the adaptive element's higher potential to improve recommendation efficiency, relative to methods without this feature.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Agrawal, R., Imielinski, T., and Swami, A. 1993. Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. In Proc. ACM SIGMOD'93 207--216.
 
2
Ardissono, L., Goy, A., Petrone, G., Segnan, M., and Torasso, P. 2003. INTRIGUE: personalized recommendation of tourist attractions for desktop and handset devices. In Applied Artificial Intelligence 17(8--9), 687--714.
 
3
Chen, L., and Pu, P. 2007. Preference-based organization interfaces: aiding user critiques in recommender systems. In Proc.UM'07, 77--86.
 
4
Frisch, D., and Clemen, R. T. 1994. Beyond expected utility: rethinking behavioral decision research. Psychological Bulletin 116, 46--54.
 
5
Jameson, A., Schäfer, R., Simons, J., and Weis, T. 1995. Adaptive provision of evaluation--oriented information: tasks and techniques. In Proc.14th IJCAI, 1886--1893.
 
6
Herlocker, J. L., Konstan, J. A., and Riedl, J. 2000. Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations. In Proc. CSCW'00, 241--250.
 
7
Keeney, R., and Raiffa, H. 1976. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Cambridge University Press.
 
8
Luce, M. F., Payne, J. W., and Bettman, J.R. 1999. Emotional trade-off difficulty and choice. Journal of Marketing Research 36, 143--159.
 
9
McCarthy, K., Reilly, J., McGinty, L., and Smyth, B. 2004. Thinking positively -- explanatory feedback for conversational recommender systems. In Workshop of 7th ECCBR, 115--124.
 
10
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., and Johnson, E. J. 1993. The Adaptive Decision Maker. Cambridge University Press.
 
11
Pu, P., and Chen, L. 2005. Integrating tradeoff support in product search tools for e-commerce sites. In Proc. 6th ACM EC, 269--278.
 
12
Pu, P., and Chen, L. 2006. Trust building with explanation interfaces. In Proc. IUI'06, 93--100.
 
13
Reilly, J., McCarthy, K., McGinty, L., and Smyth, B. 2004. Dynamic critiquing. In Proc. ECCBR'04, 763--777.
 
14
Vig, J., Sen, S., and Riedl, J. 2009. Tagsplanations: explaining recommendations using tags. In Proc. IUI'09, 47--56.