ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Recommending new movies: even a few ratings are more valuable than metadata
Full text PdfPdf (464 KB)
Source
ACM Conference On Recommender Systems archive
Proceedings of the third ACM conference on Recommender systems table of contents
New York, New York, USA
SESSION: Applications table of contents
Pages 93-100  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-435-5
Authors
István Pilászy  Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary
Domonkos Tikk  Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary
Sponsor
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 33,   Downloads (12 Months): 33,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1639714.1639731
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The Netflix Prize (NP) competition gave much attention to collaborative filtering (CF) approaches. Matrix factorization (MF) based CF approaches assign low dimensional feature vectors to users and items. We link CF and content-based filtering (CBF) by finding a linear transformation that transforms user or item descriptions so that they are as close as possible to the feature vectors generated by MF for CF. We propose methods for explicit feedback that are able to handle 140,000 features when feature vectors are very sparse. With movie metadata collected for the NP movies we show that the prediction performance of the methods is comparable to that of CF, and can be used to predict user preferences on new movies. We also investigate the value of movie metadata compared to movie ratings in regards of predictive power. We compare our solely CBF approach with a simple baseline rating-based predictor. We show that even 10 ratings of a new movie are more valuable than its metadata for predicting user ratings.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
J. Basilico and T. Hofmann. Unifying collaborative and content-based filtering. In ICML-04: Proc. of the 21st Int. Conf. on Machine learning, page 9, New York, NY, USA, 2004.
 
2
R. M. Bell and Y. Koren. Improved neighborhood-based collaborative filtering. In Proc. of KDD Cup Workshop at SIGKDD-07, 13th ACM Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 7--14, San Jose, California, USA, 2007.
 
3
R. M. Bell and Y. Koren. Scalable collaborative filtering with jointly derived neighborhood interpolation weights. In Proc of. ICDM-07, 7th IEEE Int. Conf. on Data Mining, pages 43--52, Omaha, Nebraska, USA, 2007.
 
4
R. M. Bell, Y. Koren, and C. Volinsky. The BellKor solution to the Netflix Prize. Technical Report, AT&T Labs Research, 2007.
 
5
Y. Hu, Y. Koren, and C. Volinsky. Collaborative filtering for implicit feedback datasets. In Proc. of ICDM-08, 8th IEEE Int. Conf. on Data Mining, pages 263--272, Pisa, Italy, 2008.
 
6
A. Paterek. Improving regularized singular value decomposition for collaborative filtering. In Proc. of KDD Cup Workshop at SIGKDD-07, 13th ACM Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 39--42, San Jose, California, USA, 2007.
 
7
A. P. Singh and G. J. Gordon. Relational learning via collective matrix factorization. In KDD-08: Proc. of the 14$^th$ ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2008.
 
8
G. Takács, I. Pilászy, B. Németh, and D. Tikk. On the Gravity recommendation system. In Proc. of KDD Cup Workshop at SIGKDD-07, 13th ACM Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 22--30, San Jose, California, USA, 2007.
 
9
G. Takács, I. Pilászy, B. Németh, and D. Tikk. A unified approach of factor models and neighbor based methods for large recommender systems. In Proc. of ICADIWT-08, 1st IEEE Workshop on Recommender Systems and Personalized Retrieval, pages 186--191, August 2008.
 
10
G. Takács, I. Pilászy, B. Németh, and D. Tikk. Scalable collaborative filtering approaches for large recommender systems. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 10:623--656, 2009.
 
11
G. Takács, I. Pilászy, B. Németh, and D. Tikk. Investigation of various matrix factorization methods for large recommender systems. In Proc. of the 2nd Netflix-KDD Workshop, Las Vegas, NV, USA, August 24, 2008.
 
12
Y. Zhang and J. Koren. Efficient Bayesian hierarchical user modeling for recommendation system. In SIGIR-07: Proc. of the 30th Annual Int. ACM SIGIR Conference on R&D in Information Retrieval, pages 47--54, New York, NY, USA, 2007.