ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Pairwise preference regression for cold-start recommendation
Full text PdfPdf (539 KB)
Source
ACM Conference On Recommender Systems archive
Proceedings of the third ACM conference on Recommender systems table of contents
New York, New York, USA
SESSION: Algorithms I table of contents
Pages 21-28  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-435-5
Authors
Seung-Taek Park  Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology, Yongin-si, Gyunggi-do , South Korea
Wei Chu  Yahoo! Labs, Santa Clara, CA, USA
Sponsor
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 87,   Downloads (12 Months): 87,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1639714.1639720
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Recommender systems are widely used in online e-commerce applications to improve user engagement and then to increase revenue. A key challenge for recommender systems is providing high quality recommendation to users in ``cold-start" situations. We consider three types of cold-start problems: 1) recommendation on existing items for new users; 2) recommendation on new items for existing users; 3) recommendation on new items for new users. We propose predictive feature-based regression models that leverage all available information of users and items, such as user demographic information and item content features, to tackle cold-start problems. The resulting algorithms scale efficiently as a linear function of the number of observations. We verify the usefulness of our approach in three cold-start settings on the MovieLens and EachMovie datasets, by comparing with five alternatives including random, most popular, segmented most popular, and two variations of Vibes affinity algorithm widely used at Yahoo! for recommendation.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
D. Agarwal, B. Chen, P. Elango, N. Motgi, S. Park, R. Ramakrishnan, S. Roy, and J. Zachariah. Online models for content optimization. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 21, 2009.
 
2
D. Agarwal and B.-C. Chen. Regression based latent factor models. In KDD, 2009.
 
3
D. Agarwal and S. Merugu. Predictive discrete latent factor models for large scale dyadic data. In KDD, 2007.
 
4
C. C. Aggarwal, J. L. Wolf, K.-L. Wu, and P. S. Yu. Horting hatches an egg: a new graph-theoretic approach to collaborative filtering. In ACM KDD, pages 201--212, 1999.
 
5
M. Balabanovic and Y. Shoham. Fab: content-based, collaborative recommendation. Communications of the ACM, 40(3):66--72, 1997.
 
6
J. Basilico and T. Hofmann. A joint framework for collaborative and content filtering. In ACM SIGIR, 2004.
 
7
C. Basu, H. Hirsh, and W. W. Cohen. Recommendation as classification: Using social and content-based information in recommendation. In AAAI/IAAI, pages 714--720, 1998.
 
8
R. Bell, Y. Koren, and C. Volinsky. Modeling relationships at multiple scales to improve accuracy of large recommender systems. In KDD, 2007.
 
9
D. Billsus and M. J. Pazzani. Learning collaborative information filters. In ICML, pages 46--54, 1998.
 
10
J. S. Breese, D. Heckerman, and C. Kadie. Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering. In UAI, pages 43--52, 1998.
 
11
W. Chu and S.-T. Park. Personalized recommendation on dynamic contents using probabilistic bilinear models. In Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web, 2009.
 
12
M. Claypool, A. Gokhale, T. Miranda, P. Murnikov, D. Netes, and M. Sartin. Combining content-based and collaborative filters in an online newspaper. In ACM SIGIR Workshop on Recommender Systems, 1999.
 
13
D. DeCoste. Collaborative prediction using ensembles of maximum margin matrix factorization. In ICML, 2006.
 
14
K. Goldberg, T. Roeder, D. Gupta, and C. Perkins. Eigentaste: A constant time collaborative filtering algorithm. Information Retrieval, 4(2):133--151, 2001.
 
15
N. Good, J. B. Schafer, J. A. Konstan, A. Borchers, B. M. Sarwar, J. L. Herlocker, and J. Riedl. Combining collaborative filtering with personal agents for better recommendations. In AAAI/IAAI, pages 439--446, 1999.
 
16
R. A. Harshman. Parafac2: Mathematical and technical notes. UCLA working papers in phonetics, 22:30--44, 1972.
 
17
R. Herbrich, T. Graepel, and K. Obermayer. Support vector learning for ordinal regression. In Proc. of the Ninth International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, pages 97--102, 1999.
 
18
J. L. Herlocker, J. A. Konstan, A. Borchers, and J. Riedl. An algorithmic framework for performing collaborative filtering. In ACM SIGIR, pages 230--237, 1999.
 
19
T. Hofmann and J. Puzicha. Latent class models for collaborative filtering. In IJCAI, pages 688--693, 1999.
 
20
P. Melville, R. Mooney, and R. Nagarajan. Content-boosted collaborative filtering. In AAAI, 2002.
 
21
B. Nag. Vibes: A platform-centric approach to building recommender systems. IEEE Data Eng. Bull., 31(2):23--31, 2008.
 
22
L. Omberg, G. H. Golub, and O. Alter. A tensor higher-order singular value decomposition for integrative analysis of dna microarray data from different studies. PNAS, 104(47):18371--18376, 2007.
 
23
T. Pahikkala, E. Tsivtsivadze, A. Airola, T. Boberg, and T. Salakoski. Learning to rank with pairwise regularized least-squares. In SIGIR 2007 Workshop on Learning to Rank for Information Retrieval, pages 27--33, 2007.
 
24
S.-T. Park, D. M. Pennock, O. Madani, N. Good, and D. DeCoste. Naive filterbots for robust cold-start recommendations. In KDD, 2006.
 
25
M. J. Pazzani. A framework for collaborative, content-based and demographic filtering. Artificial Intelligence Review, 13(5--6):393--408, 1999.
 
26
D. Pennock, E. Horvitz, S. Lawrence, and C. L. Giles. Collaborative filtering by personality diagnosis: A hybrid memory- and model-based approach. In UAI, pages 473--480, 2000.
 
27
B. Sarwar, G. Karypis, J. Konstan, and J. Riedl. Application of dimensionality reduction in recommender systems -- a case study. In ACM WebKDD Workshop, 2000.
 
28
B. M. Sarwar, G. Karypis, J. A. Konstan, and J. Reidl. Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In WWW, pages 285--295, 2001.
 
29
A. I. Schein, A. Popescul, L. H. Ungar, and D. M. Pennock. Methods and metrics for cold-start recommendations. In ACM SIGIR, 2002.
 
30
U. Shardanand and P. Maes. Social information filtering: Algorithms for automating "word of mouth". In CHI, 1995.
 
31
D. H. Stern, R. Herbrich, and T. Graepel. Matchbox: large scale online bayesian recommendations. In Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web, 2009.
 
32
J. Sun, D. Tao, and C. Faloutsos. Beyond streams and graphs: Dynamic tensor analysis. In Proc. of The Twelfth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2006.
 
33
L. R. Tucker. Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis. Psychometrika, 31:279--311, 1966.
 
34
H. Wang and N. Ahuja. Effcient rank-r approximation of tensors: A new approach to compact representation of image ensembles and recognition. In Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2005.
 
35
G. Xue, C. Lin, Q. Yang, W. Xi, H. Zeng, Y. Yu, and Z. Chen. Scalable collaborative filtering using cluster-based smoothing. In SIGIR, 2005.
 
36
C. Ziegler, G. Lausen, and L. Schmidt. Taxonomy-driven computation of product recommendations. In CIKM, 2004.