The productivity paradox of information technology

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Alpar, P, and Kim, M. A comparison of approacl~es to the measurement of IT value. In Proceedings of the Twenty- Second Hawaiian International Conference On System Science (Honolufu. Hawaii 1990).
	2	Baily, M, and Chakrabarti, A. Electronics and white-:ollar productivity. In ln novathm and the Productivity Crisis, Brookings, Washington, I988.
	3	Baily, M.N. and Gordon, R.J. The productivity slowdown, measurement issues, and the explosion of computer power. In Brooking~ Papers on Economic A ctivi~,, W.C. Brainard, and G.I., Perry. The Brookings Institution, Washington, I),C,, 1988,
	4	Barua, A., Kriebel, C. and Mukhopadhyay, T. Information technob og3' and business valtm: An analytic and empirical investigation. Working Paper, University of Texas, Austin, Tex. May 199 I.
	5	Berndt, E.R. and Morrison, C.J. High-tech capital, economic and labour composition in U.S. manufacturing industries: An exploratory analysis. National Bureau of Economic Research Manuscript, Apr. 24, 1991.
	6	Brooke, G, l:nlbrmation technology and productivity: An economic analysis of the effects of prcvduct differentiation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1991.
	7	Brynj:()lfsson, E. and Hitt, I~. Is information systems spending productive? New evidence and new results, inte> nal.ionai Ca)~erence on Information Systems (Orlando, FL, 1993).
	8	Erik Brynjolfsson , Thomas W. Malone , Vijay Gurbaxani , Ajit Kambil, Does information technology lead to smaller firms?, Management Science, v.40 n.12, p.1628-1644, Dec. 1994 [doi>10.1287/mnsc.40.12.1628]
	9	Eric K. Clemons, Evaluation of strategic investments in information technology, Communications of the ACM, v.34 n.1, p.22-36, Jan. 1991 [doi>10.1145/99977.99985]
	10	Cron, W.I.. and Sobol, M.G. The relationship between computerization and performance: A strategy tbr maximizing the econo,nic benefits ol computerization. J. Inf. Manag. 6 (1983), 171-181.
	11	David, P.A. Computer and Dynamo. 1he Modern Productivity Paradox in a Not- Too-Distant Mirror. Center for Economic Poficy Research, Stanford, Calif. (1989).
	12	Denistm, E.F. Estimates of productivity Change by Industry: An Evaluation arm an Alternative. The Brookings Institution, Washington), DC, i989.
	13	Economist. Working harder, doling less. (1990), 17,
	14	Franke, R.F. Technological revolution and productivity decline' Computer introduction it, the financial industry, Tech. Forecast. Soc. Change 3I (1987).
	15	Hammer. M. Reengineering work: Don't automate, obliterate. Harvard Bua'. Rev. (July-Aug. 1990), 104-t 12.
	16	Harris, S.E. and Katz, J.L. Predicting organizational performance using information technology, managerial control ratios. In Prorceedings of the Twenty--Second Hawaikm International Conqference ~m System Science (Honolulu, Hawaii, 1989).
	17	Kaplan, R. Management accounting for advanced technological environments. Sci. 24.5 (Sept. 1989), 819- 823.
	18	C. F. Kemerer , G. L. Sosa, Systems development risks in strategic information systems, Information and Software Technology, v.33 n.3, p.212-223, April 1991 [doi>10.1016/0950-5849(91)90136-Y]
	19	Loveman, G.W. An assessment of the productivity impact on information technologies. MIT Management in the 1990s working paper #88-054, July, 1988.
	20	Malone, T. and Rockart, J. Computers, networks and the corporation. Sci. LAm, 265, 3 (1991), 128--136.
	21	Morrison, C.j. and Berndt, E.R. Assessing the productivity of infi)rmation technology" equipment iu the U.S. manufacturing industries. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper #3582, Jan. 1990.
	22	Noyelle, T., Ed. Skills, Wages, and Pro. ductivity, in the Service Sector. Westview Press, Boulder, Col., 1990.
	23	Osterman, P. The impact of computers on the employment of clerks and managers. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 39 (1986), 175-1186.
	24	Raymond R. Panko, Is office productivity stagnant?, MIS Quarterly, v.15 n.2, p.191-203, June 1991 [doi>10.2307/249380]
	25	Parsons, DJ., Gottlieb, C.C. and Denny, M. th-oductivity and computers in Canadian banking. University of Toronto, Dept .... of Economics working paper #9(112, .June, 1990.
	26	Roach, S.S. America's white-collar productivity dilemma. Manuf Eng. (Aug. 1989), 104.
	27	Roach, S.S. Services under siege- The restructuring imperative, liar. yard Bus, Re,,,. (Sept.-Oct. 1991), 82- 92.
	28	Siegel, D. and Grilicbes, Z. Purchased service?s,, oul so\|l lcing, coin puters ;rod productivity in manufacturing, National Bureau o\| Economic Research WP#3678, Apr., 1991,
	29	Snow, C.P. Government science and public lx)licy. Science t5i (1966), 650- 653.
	30	Paul A. Strassmann, The Business Value of Computers: An Executive's Guide, Information Economics Press, New Canaan, CT, 1990
	31	"T'hurow, L. Economic paradigms atut stow American productivity growth. Ea.~tern Eco. J. 13 (1987), 333-343.
	32	Weill, P. Do Computers Pay Off? iCII Press, Washington, D.C., 1990.