ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Coboost learning of visual categories with 1st and 2nd order features from Google images
Full text PdfPdf (640 KB)
Source
International Multimedia Conference archive
Proceedings of the seventeen ACM international conference on Multimedia table of contents
Beijing, China
SESSION: Short papers session 1: content analysis table of contents
Pages 533-536  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-608-3
Authors
Xi Liu  Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Zhiping Shi  Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Zhixin Li  Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Zhongzhi Shi  Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Sponsor
SIGMULTIMEDIA: ACM Special Interest Group on Multimedia
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 13,   Downloads (12 Months): 13,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1631272.1631349
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Conventional object recognition techniques rely heavily on manually annotated image datasets to achieve good performances. However, collecting high quality datasets is really laborious. In this paper, we propose a semi-supervised framework for learning visual categories from Google Images. The 1st and 2nd order features, which define bag of words representation and spatial relationship between local features respectively, make up an independent and redundant feature split. We then integrate a cotraining algorithm CoBoost with these two features. We create two boosting classifiers based on the 1st and 2nd order features respectively in the training, during which one classifier provides labels for the other. Besides, the 2nd order features are generated dynamically rather than extracted exhaustively to avoid high computation. An active learning technique is also introduced to further improve the performance. We evaluate our method on the benchmark datasets, showing results competitive with the state-of-the-art unsupervised approaches and some supervised techniques.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
T. L. Berg and D. A. Forsyth. Animals on the web. In CVPR,2006.
 
2
M. Collins and Y. Singer. Unsupervised models for named entity classification. In EMNLP/VLC, 1999.
 
3
R. Fergus, Feifei Li, P. Perona, and A. Zisserman. Learning object categories from google's image search. In ICCV, 2005.
 
4
Li-Jia Li, Gang Wang, and Feifei Li. OPTIMOL: automatic object picture collection via incremental model learning. In CVPR, 2007.
 
5
D. Liu, G. Hua, P. Viola, and T. Chen. Integrated Feature Selection and Higher-order Spatial Feature Extraction for Object Categorization. In CVPR, 2008.
 
6
A. Opelt, A. Fussenegger, and P. Auer. Weak Hypotheses and Boosting for Generic Object Detection and Recognition. In ECCV, 2004.
 
7
S. Savarese, A. Criminisi, and J. Winn. Discriminative Object Class Models of Appearance and Shape by Correlatons. In CVPR, 2006.
 
8
F. Schroff, A. Criminisi, and A. Zisserman. Harvesting image databases from the web. In ICCV, 2007.
 
9
J. Sivic, et al. Discovering Object Categories in Image Collections. In ICCV, 2005.
 
10
J. Zhang, et al. Local Features and Kernels for Classification of Texture and Object Categories: A Comprehensive Study. IJCV, 73(2):213--238, 2007.