Quality-driven synthesis of embedded multi-mode control systems

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Quality-driven synthesis of embedded multi-mode control systems

Full text

Pdf (209 KB)

Source

Annual ACM IEEE Design Automation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 46th Annual Design Automation Conference table of contents

San Francisco, California

SESSION: Space and time management in embedded applications table of contents

Pages 864-869

Year of Publication: 2009

ISBN:978-1-60558-497-3

Authors

Soheil Samii	Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
Petru Eles	Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
Zebo Peng	Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
Anton Cervin	Lund University, Lund, Sweden

Sponsors

EDAC : Electronic Design Automation Consortium
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
IEEE-CAS : Circuits & Systems

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 10, Downloads (12 Months): 10, Citation Count: 0

Additional Information:

abstract references index terms

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1629911.1630131 What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

At runtime, an embedded control system can switch between alternative functional modes. In each mode, the system operates by using a schedule and controllers that exploit the available computation and communication resources to optimize the control performance in the running mode. The number of modes is usually exponential in the number of control loops, which means that all controllers and schedules cannot be produced in affordable design-time and stored in memory. This paper addresses synthesis of multi-mode embedded control systems. Our contribution is a method that trades control quality with optimization time, and that efficiently selects the schedules and controllers to be synthesized and stored in memory.

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	K. R. Apt and M. G. Wallace. Constraint Logic Programming using ECLⁱ PS^e. Cambridge University Press, 2007.
	2	E. Bini and A. Cervin. Delay-aware period assignment in control systems. In Proc. of the 29^th Real-Time Systems Symposium, pp. 291--300, 2008.
	3	R. Bosch GmbH. CAN Specification Version 2.0. 1991.
	4	FlexRay Consortium. FlexRay Communications System. Protocol Specification Version 2.1. 2005.
	5	H. Kopetz. Real-Time Systems---Design Principles for Distributed Embedded Applications. Kluwer Academic, 1997.
	6	B. Lincoln and A. Cervin. Jitterbug: A tool for analysis of real-time control performance. In Proc. of the 41^st Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 1319--1324, 2002.
	7	H. Rehbinder and M. Sanfridson. Integration of off-line scheduling and optimal control. In Proc. of the 12^th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems, pp. 137--143, 2000.
	8	S. Samii, A. Cervin, P. Eles, and Z. Peng. Integrated scheduling and synthesis of control applications on distributed embedded systems. In Proc. of the Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference, pp. 57--62, 2009.
	9	D. Seto, J. P. Lehoczky, L. Sha, and K. G. Shin. On task schedulability in real-time control systems. In Proc. of the 17^th Real-Time Systems Symposium, pp. 13--21, 1996.
	10	K. E. Årzén, A. Cervin, J. Eker, and L. Sha. An introduction to control and scheduling co-design. In Proc. of the 39^th Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 4865--4870, 2000.
	11	K. J. Åström and B. Wittenmark. Computer-Controlled Systems. Prentice Hall, 1997.