ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Technology-driven limits on DVFS controllability of multiple voltage-frequency island designs: a system-level perspective
Full text PdfPdf (277 KB)
Source Annual ACM IEEE Design Automation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 46th Annual Design Automation Conference table of contents
San Francisco, California
SESSION: Network-on-chip advances for power, reliability and the memory bottleneck table of contents
Pages 818-821  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-497-3
Authors
Siddharth Garg  Carnegie-Mellon University
Diana Marculescu  Carnegie-Mellon University
Radu Marculescu  Carnegie-Mellon University
Umit Ogras  Intel Corp.
Sponsors
EDAC : Electronic Design Automation Consortium
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
IEEE-CAS : Circuits & Systems
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 10,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1629911.1630120
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we consider the case of network-on-chip (NoC) based multiple-processor systems-on-chip (MPSoCs) implemented using multiple voltage and frequency islands (VFIs) that rely on fine-grained dynamic voltage and frequency scaling (DVFS) for run-time control of the system power dissipation. Specifically, we present a framework to compute theoretical bounds on the performance of DVFS controllers for such systems under the impact of three important technology driven constraints: (i) reliability and temperature driven upper limits on the maximum supply voltage; (ii) inductive noise driven constraints on the maximum rate of change of voltage/frequency; and (iii) increasing manufacturing process variations. Our experimental results show that, for the benchmarks considered, any DVFS control algorithm will lose up to 87% performance, measured in terms of the number of steps required to reach a reference steady state, in the presence of maximum frequency and maximum frequency increment constraints. In addition, increasing process variations can lead to up to 60% of fabricated chips being unable to meet the specified DVFS control specifications, irrespective of the DVFS algorithm used.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
S. Garg et al. Technology-Driven Limits on DVFS Controllability of Multiple Voltage-Frequency Island Designs. Technical report, CSSI, CMU, 2009.
 
2
W. Jang, D. Ding, and D. Z. Pan. A Voltage-Frequency Island aware energy optimization framework for networks-on-chip. In Proceedings of ICCAD, 2008.
 
3
W. Kim et al. System Level Analysis of Fast, Per-Core DVFS using On-Chip Switching Regulators. In Proceedings of HPCA, 2008.
 
4
B. C. Kuo. Digital Control Systems. Oxford University Press, Inc. New York, NY, USA, 1992.
 
5
D. Marculescu and S. Garg. System-level process-driven variability analysis for single and multiple voltage-frequency island systems. 2006.
 
6
K. Niyogi and D. Marculescu. Speed and voltage selection for GALS systems based on voltage/frequency islands. In Proceedings of ASP-DAC, 2005.
 
7
U. Y. Ogras et al. Variation-Adaptive Feedback Control for Networks-on-Chip with Multiple Clock Domains. In Proceedings of DAC, 2008.
 
8
H. L. Royden. Real analysis. Macmillan New York, 1968.
 
9
Q. Wu et al. Formal online methods for voltage/frequency control in multiple clock domain microprocessors. Proceedings of ASPLOS, 2004.