ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Yield-driven iterative robust circuit optimization algorithm
Full text PdfPdf (266 KB)
Source Annual ACM IEEE Design Automation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 46th Annual Design Automation Conference table of contents
San Francisco, California
SESSION: Robust analog system design table of contents
Pages 599-604  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-497-3
Authors
Yan Li  Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
Vladimir Stojanović  Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
Sponsors
EDAC : Electronic Design Automation Consortium
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
IEEE-CAS : Circuits & Systems
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 9,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1629911.1630065
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper proposes an equation-based multi-scenario iterative robust optimization methodology for analog/mixed-signal circuits. We show that due to local circuit performance monotonicity in random variations constraint maximization can be used to efficiently find critical constraints and worst-case scenarios of random process variations and populate them into a multi-scenario optimization. This algorithm scales gracefully with circuit size and is tested on both two-stage and fully differential folded-cascode operational amplifiers with a 90 nm predictive model. The improving yield-trends are confirmed across process and random variations with Hspice Monte-Carlo simulations.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
M. Hershenson, "Design of pipeline analog-to-digital converters via geometric programming," in Proc. of ICCAD, 2002, pp. 317--324.
 
2
M. Hershenson, S. Boyd, and T. Lee, "Optimal deisgn of a cmos op-amp via geometric programming," IEEE Trans. Computer-Aided Design, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1--21, 2001.
 
3
D. Colleran, C. Portmann, A. Hassibi, C. Crusius, S. Mohan, S. Boyd, T. Lee, and M. del Mar Hershenson, "Optimization of phase-locked loop circuits via geometric programming," Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, 2003. Proceedings of the IEEE 2003, pp. 377--380, Sept. 2003.
 
4
Y. Xu, K.-L. Hsiung, X. Li, I. Nausieda, S. Boyd, and L. Pileggi, "Opera: optimization with ellipsoidal uncertainty for robust analog ic design," in IEEE/ACM Design Automation Conference (DAC), 2005, pp. 632--637.
 
5
K. Hsiung, S. Kim, and S. Boyd, "Tractable approximate robust geometric programming," Optimization and Engineering, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1389--4420, 2008.
 
6
K. Antreich and H. Graeb, "Circuit optimization driven by worst-case distances," Computer-Aided Design, 1991. ICCAD-91. Digest of Technical Papers., 1991 IEEE International Conference on, no. SN -, pp. 166--169, 1991.
 
7
A. Dharchoudhury and S. Kang, "Worst-case analysis and optimization of vlsi circuit performances," Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 481--492, Apr 1995.
 
8
A. Mutapcic, S. Boyd, A. Farjadpour, S. Johnson, and Y. Avniel, "Robust design of slow-light tapers in periodic waveguides," Engineering Optimization, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 365--384, 2009.
 
9
M. Pelgrom, A. Duinmaijer, and A. Welbers, "Matching properties of mos transistors," IEEE JSSC, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1433--1440, 1989.
 
10
S. Nassif, "Modeling and analysis of manufacturing variations," Custom Integrated Circuits, 2001, IEEE Conference on., pp. 223--228, 2001.
 
11
X. Li, J. Le, P. Gopalakrishnan, and L. T. Pileggi, "Asymptotic probability extraction for nonnormal performance distributions," Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 16--37, Jan. 2007.
 
12
S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe, Convex Optimization. New York: Cambridge Univeristy Press, 2004.
 
13
R. Kanj, R. Joshi, and S. Nassif, "Mixture importance sampling and its application to the analysis of sram designs in the presence of rare failure events," in DAC '06: Proceedings of the 43rd annual conference on Design automation. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2006, pp. 69--72.
 
14
J. Kim, K. D. Jones, and M. A. Horowitz, "Fast, non-monte-carlo estimation of transient performance variation due to device mismatch," in DAC '07: Proceedings of the 44th annual conference on Design automation. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2007, pp. 440--443.