ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Conception de systèmes interactifs mixtes: articulation d'une méthode informelle et d'un modèle d'interaction
Full text PdfPdf (280 KB)
Source
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series archive
Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Association Francophone d'Interaction Homme-Machine table of contents
Grenoble, France
SESSION: La conception en action (I) table of contents
Pages 293-302  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-461-4
Authors
Christophe Bortolaso  IRIT-IHCS, Toulouse Cedex
Emmanuel Dubois  IRIT-IHCS, Toulouse Cedex
Cédric Bach  Metapages, Toulouse, France
Laurence Nigay  IIHM-LIG, Grenoble Cedex
Céline Coutrix  IIHM-LIG, Grenoble Cedex
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 8,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1629826.1629874
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

To face the difficulties encountered by the mixed interactive systems designers during the design step, we propose a new approach for the design phase. This article introduces the articulation of an informal method, which is the focus-group, with a formal mixed interaction model. The articulation allows a better integration of the design step into the process and a more systematic exploration of the mixed interactive system domain. We illustrate this articulation by considering two mixed interaction models: ASUR and Mixed Interaction Model. Based on these two implementations of our approach, we carry out a comparative analysis in order to identify the strengths and weaknesses of our approach.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Bach, C. et Scapin, D. L. Critères Ergonomiques pour les Interactions Homme-Environnements Virtuels: définitions, justifications et exemples. 2005. http://www.inria.fr/rrrt/rr-5531.html.
 
2
Barthet, M. et Tarby, J. The Diane+ method. Presses Universitaires de Namur (1996), 95--120.
 
3
Beaudouin-Lafon, M. Designing interaction, not interfaces. AVI'04, ACM (2004), 15--22.
 
4
Bonnardel, N. Créativité et conception: Approches cognitives et ergonomiques. Solal Editeurs, 2006.
 
5
Calvillo-Gámez, E. H., Leland, N., Shaer, O., et Jacob, R. J. K. The TAC paradigm: unified conceptual framework to represent Tangible User Interfaces. Latin American conference on Humancomputer interaction ACM (2003), 9--15.
 
6
Card, S. K., Newell, A., et Moran, T. P. The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1983.
 
7
CARE D311. Illustrations de l'articulation entre méthodes d'analyse et modélisation. Livrable du projet CARE Lot 3, 2009, www.careproject.fr.
 
8
Carroll, J. M., éd. Interfacing thought: cognitive aspects of human-computer interaction. MIT Press, 1987.
 
9
Cheung, D., Tigli, J., Lavirotte, S., et Riveill, M. Wcomp: a Multi-Design Approach for Prototyping Applications using Heterogeneous Resources. Seventeenth IEEE International Workshop on Rapid System Prototyping, 2006., (2006), 119--125.
 
10
Coutrix, C. et Nigay, L. Balancing Physical and Digital Properties in Mixed Objects. AVI'08, ACM (2008), 305--308.
 
11
Dubois, E., Gauffre, G., Bach, C., Salembier, P. Participatory Design Meets Mixed Reality Design Models. CADUI'08, 71--84.
 
12
Dubois, E., Gray, P. A Design-Oriented Information-Flow Refinement of the ASUR Interaction Model. EIS'08, 465--482.
 
13
Fishkin, K. P. A taxonomy for and analysis of tangible interfaces. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 8, 5 (2004), 347--358.
 
14
Kontio, J., Lehtola, L., et Bragge, J. Using the focus group method in software engineering: obtaining practitioner and user experiences. ISESE 2004, 271--280.
 
15
Muller, M. J. PICTIVE - an exploration in participatory design. Human factors in computing systems: Reaching through technology, ACM (1991), 225--231.
 
16
Nielsen, J. The use and misuse of focus groups. Software, IEEE 14, 1 (1997), 94--95.
 
17
Norman, D. A. et Draper, S. W. User Centered System Design; New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1986.
 
18
Paternò, F., Santoro, C., et Tahmassebi, S. Formal Models for Cooperative Tasks: Concepts and an Application for En-Route Air Traffic Control. DSV-IS, (1998).
 
19
Renevier, P. et Nigay, L. Notation de Conception pour les Systèmes Mixtes Collaboratifs et Mobiles. UBIMOB'04, ACM (2004), 66--73.
 
20
Sandor, C. et Klinker, G. A rapid prototyping software infrastructure for user interfaces in ubiquitous augmented reality. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 9, 3 (2005), 169--185.
 
21
Scapin, D. et Bastien, J. Analyse des tâches et aide ergonomique à la conception: l'approche MAD*. Analyse et conception de l'IHM. 2001, 85--116.
 
22
Schmalstieg, D., Fuhrmann, A., Hesina, G., et coll. The studierstube augmented reality project. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. 11, 1 (2002), 33--54.
 
23
Sears, A. et Jacko, J. A. The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies, and Emerging Applications. CRC Press Inc, 2007.
 
24
Serrano, M., Juras, D, Nigay, L. A Three Dimensional Characterization Space of Software Components for Rapidly Developing Multimodal Interfaces, ICMI'08, ACM (2008), 149--156.
 
25
Smith, S. Exploring the Specification of Haptic Interaction. Interactive Systems. Design, Specification, and Verification. 2007, 171--184.
 
26
Vaajakallio, K. et Mattelmäki, T. Collaborative design exploration: envisioning future practices with make tools. ACM (2007), 223--238.
 
27
Wilson, C. E. Brainstorming pitfalls and best practices. interactions 13, 5 (2006), 50--63.