Influence d'images évocatrices et distractrices sur une tâche de jugement en acoustique des salles

ABSTRACT

In the context of the design of a multimodal environment for room acoustics evaluation, we investigate the link between a projected image and the sound of an acoustic simulation. 54 subjects have been tasked to judge the level of reverberation of a sound in a control situation (without image) and in an experimental situation. In this experimental condition, half the subjects were presented a coherent image aiming at supporting the evaluation task and the other half, a disturbing image. Our results show a positive influence from the evocative images, and no influence from the distractive images.

REFERENCES

• 1: Beranek L. (1996). Concert and opera halls: How they sound. AIP Press.
• 2: J. Coutaz, L. Nigay, Les propriétés « CARE » dans les interfaces multimodales. Actes de la conférence IHM'94, Lille, 1994.
• 3: Dawans, A., Demaret, J. N., Safin, S. (2009) Principes de modélisation pour la simulation acoustique. Actes de la conférence SCAN 2009, Nancy
• 4: De Gelder, B. & Bertelson, P. (2003). Multisensory integration, perception and ecological validity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(10), 460--467.
• 5: Delorme, A. (2003). L'organisation perceptive In A. Delorme & M. Flüückiger (Eds). Perception et réalité. Introduction à la psychologie des perceptions. De Boeck Université.
• 6: Embrechts J. J. (2000). Broad spectrum diffusion model for room acoustics ray-tracing algorithms. Journal Acousical Society of America 107, 2068--2081.
• 7: Embrechts, J. J., Werner, N. and Lesoinne, S. (2005). Auralization in Room Acoustics using Directional Impulse Responses Computed by Sound Ray Techniques. Proceedings of the 4th Forum Acusticum Congress, Budapest, 2535--2538.
• 8: Krokstad A., Strom S., Sordal S. (1968). Calculating the acoustical room response by the use of a ray tracing technique. Journal of Sound and Vibration 8, 118--125.
• 9: Massaro, D. W. (2004). From multisensory integration to talking heads and language learning. In G. Calvert, C. Spence & B. E. Stein (Eds.), The Handbook of Multisensory Processes. Cambridge: MIT Press
• 10: Martin, J. C., 1997, TYCOON: Theoretical Frame-work and Software Tools for Multimodal Interfaces. Intelligence and Multimodality in Multimedia Interfaces, AAAI Press.
• 11: Reason, J. (1993). L'erreur humaine. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
• 12: Schroeder M. R., Gottlob D., Siebrasse K. F. (1974). Comparative study of european concert halls: correlation of subjective preference with geometric and acoustic parameters. Journal Acousical Society of America 56, 1192--1201.
• 13: Streri, A. (2003). L'intermodalité. In A. Delorme & M. Flüückiger (Eds). Perception et réalité. Introduction à la psychologie des perceptions. De Boeck Université.
• 14: Vorländer, M. (2007). Auralization: Fundamentals of Acoustics, Modelling, Simulation, Algorithms and Acoustic Virtual Reality. Berlin: Springer.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES
      H.1.2 User/Machine Systems

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.1 Multimedia Information Systems

General Terms:
Experimentation, Human Factors

Keywords:
experimentation, multimodality, room acoustics