ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Changing how people view changes on the web
Full text PdfPdf (1.15 MB)
Source
Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology archive
Proceedings of the 22nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology table of contents
Victoria, BC, Canada
SESSION: The tangled web we weave table of contents
Pages 237-246  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-745-5
Authors
Jaime Teevan  Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA, USA
Susan T. Dumais  Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA, USA
Daniel J. Liebling  Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA, USA
Richard L. Hughes  Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 38,   Downloads (12 Months): 76,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1622176.1622221
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The Web is a dynamic information environment. Web content changes regularly and people revisit Web pages frequently. But the tools used to access the Web, including browsers and search engines, do little to explicitly support these dynamics. In this paper we present DiffIE, a browser plug-in that makes content change explicit in a simple and lightweight manner. DiffIE caches the pages a person visits and highlights how those pages have changed when the person returns to them. We describe how we built a stable, reliable, and usable system, including how we created compact, privacy-preserving page representations to support fast difference detection. Via a longitudinal user study, we explore how DiffIE changed the way people dealt with changing content. We find that much of its benefit came not from exposing expected change, but rather from drawing attention to unexpected change and helping people build a richer understanding of the Web content they frequent.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Adar, E., M. Dontcheva, J. Fogarty, and D. S. Weld. Zoetrope: Interacting with the ephemeral Web. UIST '08, 2008, 239--248.
 
2
Adar, E., J. Teevan, and S. T. Dumais. Resonance on the Web: Web dynamics and revisitation patterns. CHI '09, 2009, 1381--1390.
 
3
Borodin, Y., J. P. Bigham, R. Raman and I. V. Ramakrishnan. What's new?--Making Web page updates accessible. ASSETS '08, 2008, 145--152.
 
4
Bharat, K. and A. Broder. Mirror, mirror on the Web: A study of host pairs with replicated content. WWW '99, 1999, 1579--1590.
 
5
Bucy, E., A. Lang, R. Potter, and M. Grabe. Formal features of cyberspace: Relationships between Web page complexity and site traffic. JASIS, 50(13):1246--1256, 1999.
 
6
Catledge, L. D. and J. E. Pitkow. Characterizing browsing strategies in the World-Wide Web. WWW '95, 1995, 1065--1073.
 
7
Cho, J. and H. Garcia-Molina. The evolution of the Web and implications for an incremental crawler. VLDB '00, 2000, 200--209.
 
8
Cockburn, A. and B. McKenzie. What do Web users do? An empirical analysis of Web use. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 54(6):903--922, 2001.
 
9
Douglis, F., A. Feldmann, and B. Krishnamurthy. Rate of change and other metrics: A live study of the World Wide Web. USENIX Symposium on Internet Technology and Systems, 1997.
 
10
Fetterly, D., M. Manasse, M. Najork, and Wiener, J. A large-scale study of the evolution of Web pages. WWW '03, 2003, 669--678.
 
11
Foster, A. and N. Ford. Serendipity and information seeking: An empirical study, Journal of Documentation, 59(3): 321--340, 2003.
 
12
Hupp, D. and R. Miller. Smart Bookmarks: Automatic retroactive macro recording on the Web. UIST '07, 2007, 81--90.
 
13
Jatowt, A., Y. Kawai, H. Ohshima, and K. Tanaka. What can history tell us? Towards different models of interaction with document histories. HT '08, 2008, 5--14.
 
14
Jones, R. and Fain, D. C. Query word deletion prediction. SIGIR '03, 2003, 435--436.
 
15
Kellar, M., C. Watters, and K. M. Inkpen. An exploration of Web-based monitoring: Implications for design. CHI '07, 2007, 377--386.
 
16
Levering, R. and Cutler, M. The portrait of a common HTML Web page. DocEng '06, 2006, 198--204.
 
17
Liu, L., C. Pu, and W. Tang. WebCQ: Detecting and delivering information changes on the Web. CIKM '00, 2000, 512--519.
 
18
Liu, L., W. Tang, D. Buttler, and C. Pu, Information monitoring on the Web: A scalable solution. WWW '02, 2002, 263--304.
 
19
Nadamoto, A. and K. Tanaka. A Comparative Web Browser (CWB) for browsing and comparing Web pages. WWW '03, 2003, 727--735.
 
20
Ntoulas, A., Cho, J., and Olston, C. What's new on the Web? The evolution of the Web from a search engine perspective. WWW '04, 2004, 1--12.
 
21
Obendorf, Hartmut, H, Weinreich, E. Herder, and M. Mayer. Web page revisitation revisited: Implications of a long-term click-stream study of browser usage. CHI '07, 2007, 597--606.
 
22
Tauscher, L. and S. Greenberg. How people revisit Web pages: Empirical findings and implications for the design of history systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 47(1):97--137, 1997.
 
23
Teevan, J., E. Adar, R. Jones, and M. A. Potts. Information re-retrieval: Repeat queries in Yahoo's logs. SIGIR '07, 2007, 151--158.
 
24
Weinreich, H., Obendorf, H, Herder, E., and Mayer, M. Not quite the average: An empirical study of Web use. TWEB, 2(1), 2008.