Mouse 2.0

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Mouse 2.0: multi-touch meets the mouse

Full text

Pdf (9.86 MB)

Source

Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology archive
Proceedings of the 22nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology table of contents

Victoria, BC, Canada

SESSION: Hold me, squeeze me table of contents

Pages 33-42

Year of Publication: 2009

ISBN:978-1-60558-745-5

Authors

Nicolas Villar	Microsoft Research Cambridge, Cambrdige, United Kingdom
Shahram Izadi	Microsoft Research Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Dan Rosenfeld	Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA
Hrvoje Benko	Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA, USA
John Helmes	Microsoft Research Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Jonathan Westhues	Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA
Steve Hodges	Microsoft Research Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Eyal Ofek	Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA
Alex Butler	Microsoft Research Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Xiang Cao	Microsoft Research Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Billy Chen	Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA

Sponsors

ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 195, Downloads (12 Months): 195, Citation Count: 0

Additional Information:

abstract references index terms

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1622176.1622184 What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper we present novel input devices that combine the standard capabilities of a computer mouse with multi-touch sensing. Our goal is to enrich traditional pointer-based desktop interactions with touch and gestures. To chart the design space, we present five different multi-touch mouse implementations. Each explores a different touch sensing strategy, which leads to differing form-factors and hence interactive possibilities. In addition to the detailed description of hardware and software implementations of our prototypes, we discuss the relative strengths, limitations and affordances of these novel input devices as informed by the results of a preliminary user study.

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Air Mouse. Logitech. http://tinyurl.com/3qtor8. (last accessed March 2009).
	2	Balakrishnan, R., Baudel, T., Kurtenbach, G., and Fitzmaurice, G. (1997). The Rockin'Mouse: Integral 3D Manipulation on a Plane. Proc. of ACM CHI '97. p. 311--318.
	3	Balakrishnan, R. and Patel, P. (1998). The PadMouse: Facilitating Selection and Spatial Positioning for the Non-Dominant Hand. Proc. of ACM CHI '98. p. 9--16.
	4	Benko, H., Wilson, A., and Balakrishnan, R. (2008). Sphere: Multi-Touch Interactions on a Spherical Display. Proc. of ACM UIST '08. p. 77--86.
	5	Benko, H., Wilson, A., and Baudisch, P. (2006) Precise Selection Techniques for Multi-Touch Screens. Proc. of ACM CHI '06. p. 1263--1272.
	6	Butler, A., Izadi, S., and Hodges, S. (2008). SideSight: Multi-'Touch' Interactions around Small Devices. Proc. of ACM UIST '08. p. 201--204.
	7	Cechanowicz, J., Irani, P., and Subramanian, S., (2007). Augmenting The Mouse With Pressure Sensitive Input. Proc. of ACM CHI '07. p. 1385--1394.
	8	Dietz, P. and Leigh, D. (2001). DiamondTouch: A Multi-User Touch Technology. Proc. of ACM UIST '01. p. 219--226.
	9	Engelbart, D.C. et al. (1968). A Research Center for Augmenting Human Intellect. (demonstration) Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park, CA. http://sloan.stanford.edu/MouseSite/1968Demo.html.
	10	Fallman, D. and Yttergren, B. (2007). The Design of a Computer Mouse Providing Three Degrees of Freedom, HCI Internationa '07l.
	11	Forlines, C., Wigdor, D., Shen, C., and Balakrishnan, R. (2007). Direct-touch vs. mouse input for tabletop displays. ACM CHI '07. p. 647--656.
	12	Go Pro Air Mouse. Gyration. http://tinyurl.com/l3wmow (last accessed March 2009)
	13	Han, J. (2005). Low-Cost Multi-Touch Sensing Through Frustrated Total Internal Reflection. ACM UIST '05. p. 115--118.
	14	Hinckley, K., Sinclair, M., Hanson, E., Szeliski, R., Conway, M. (1999). The VideoMouse: A Camera-Based Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Input Device. Proc. of ACM UIST '99. p. 103--112.
	15	iGesture Pad. FingerWorks. http://www.fingerworks. com. 2009.
	16	IOGEAR. Laptop Users Prefer Mice over Touchpads, Survey. PC Business Products, 2003.
	17	Kim, S., Kim, H., Lee, B., Nam, T.-J., and Lee, W. (2008). Inflatable Mouse: Volume-Adjustable Mouse with Air-Pressure-Sensitive Input and Haptic Feedback. Proc. of ACM CHI '08. p. 211--224.
	18	Latulipe, C., Kaplan, C.S., and Clarke, C.L.A. (2005). Bimanual and Unimanual Image Alignment: an Evaluation of Mouse-based Techniques. Proc. of ACM UIST '05. p. 123--131.
	19	MacKenzie, I.S., Soukoreff, R.W., and Pal, C. (1997). A Two-Ball Mouse Affords Three Degrees of Freedom. ACM CHI Extended Abstracts '97. p. 303--304.
	20	Malik, S., Ranjan, A., and Balakrishnan, R. (2005). Interacting with Large Displays from a Distance with Vision-tracked Multi-finger Gestural Input. Proc. of ACM UIST '05. p. 43--52.
	21	Matsushita, N., and Rekimoto, J. (1997). HoloWall: Designing a Finger, Hand, Body, and Object Sensitive Wall. Proc. of ACM UIST '97. p. 209--210.
	22	Microsoft Surface. Microsoft. http://www.microsoft.com/surface..(last accessed March 2009).
	23	Mighty Mouse. Apple. http://www.apple.com/mightymouse/. (last accessed March 2009).
	24	MoGo Mouse BT. Newton Peripherals, LLC. http://tinyurl.com/yw4lbv. 2009.
	25	Moscovich, T. Hughes, J.F. Multi-finger cursor techniques. Proc. GI '06, 1-7, 2006.
	26	Rekimoto, J. (2002). SmartSkin: an Infrastructure for Freehand Manipulation on Interactive Surfaces. Proc. of ACM CHI '02. p. 113--120.
	27	Siek, K.A., Rogers, Y. Connelly, K.H. (2005). Fat Finger Worries: How Older and Younger Users Physically Interact with PDAs. Proc. of INTERACT '05. p. 267--280.
	28	Siio, I., Masui, T., and Fukuchi, K. (1999) Real-World Interaction Using the FieldMouse. Proc. of ACM UIST '99. p. 113--119.
	29	TrackPoint Mouse. (2004). IBM Research. http://www.almaden.ibm.com/cs/user/tp/tpmouse.html. (last accessed March 2009).
	30	Venolia, G. (1993). Facile 3D Direct Manipulation. Proc. of ACM CHI '93. p.31--36.
	31	Wigdor, D., Forlines, C., Baudisch, P., Barnwell, J., and Shen, C. (2007) Lucid Touch: a See-through Mobile Device. Proc. of ACM UIST '07. p. 269--278.
	32	Wobbrock, J.O., Wilson, A.D, Li, Y. Gestures without Libraries, Toolkits or Training: A $1 Recognizer for User Interface Prototypes. Proc of ACM UIST '07. P.
	33	Zimmerman, T., Smith, J., Paradiso, J., Allport, D. and Gershenfeld, N. Applying Electric Field Sensing to Human-Computer Interfaces. Proc. of ACM CHI '95. p. 280--287.