Community sensor grids

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Community sensor grids: virtualization for sharing across domains

Full text

Pdf (668 KB)

Source

International Conference On Mobile Systems, Applications And Services archive
Proceedings of the First Workshop on Virtualization in Mobile Computing table of contents

Breckenridge, Colorado

SESSION: Security table of contents

Pages 49-54

Year of Publication: 2008

ISBN:978-1-60558-328-0

Authors

Amiya Bhattacharya	New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM
Meddage S. Fernando	New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM
Partha Dasgupta	Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 9, Downloads (12 Months): 9, Citation Count: 0

Additional Information:

abstract references index terms

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1622103.1622105 What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Wireless sensor networks have been traditionally designed to be privately owned and used. Hence the two hallmark features of sensor networks, namely customized network applications and the collaborative in-network processing, are not achievable beyond the boundary of the users' administrative domains (except for limited scope data sharing through Internet gateways). This position paper advocates a contrarian notion of sensor grid that preserves the operational continuity of the participating sensornets and yet allows controlled sharing of sensor node hardware capabilities over multiple administrative domains. This is achieved by stitching together virtualized nodes donated by participating sensornets into a transient virtual sensornet underlay, which is called a Community Sensor Grid. Possible approaches for node virtualization support are discussed for some existing sensornet OS platforms. The formation, operation and dissolution of the transient underlay are to be supported by a P2P overlay formed by the Internet gateways of participating sensornets.

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Arch Rock Corporation, 2007. A sensor network architecture for the IP enterprise. In proceedings of the 6^th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN 2007, Cambridge, Massachusetts, April 2007), 575. DOI=<u>10.1145/1236360.1236447</u>.
	2	R. Balani et al., 2006. Multi-level software reconfiguration for sensor networks. In proceedings of the 6^th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Embedded Software (EMSOFT'06, Seoul, Korea, October 2006), 112--121. DOI=<u>10.1145/1176887.1176904</u>.
	3	S. Bhatti et al., 2005. MANTIS OS: An embedded multithreaded operating system for wireless micro-sensor platforms. Mobile Networks and Applications, 10, 4 (August 2005), 563--579, Springer Science. DOI=<u>10.1145/1160162.1160178</u>.
	4	J. Burke et al., 2006. Participatory sensing. In proceedings of the 1^st Workshop on World-Sensor-Web (WSW'06, Boulder, Colorado, October 2006).
	5	A. Campbell et al., 2006. People-centric urban sensing. In proceedings of the 2^nd Annual International Workshop on Wireless Internet (WICON 2006, Boston, Massachusetts, August 2006). DOI=<u>10.1145/1234161.1234179</u>.
	6	Q. Cao et al., 2008. The LiteOS Operating System: Towards Unix-like abstractions for wireless sensor networks. In proceedings of the 7^th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN 2008, St. Louis, Missouri, April 2008), 233--244. DOI=<u>10.1109/IPSN.2008.54</u>.
	7	D. Culler, D. Estrin and M. Srivastava, 2004. Overview of sensor networks. IEEE Computer, 37, 8 (August 2004), 41--49. DOI=<u>10.1109/MC.2004.93</u>.
	8	A. Dunkels et al., 2003. Full TCP/IP for 8-bit architectures. In proceedings of the 1^st International Conference on Mobile Systems Applications and Services (MobiSys '03, San Francisco, California, May 2003), 85--98. DOI=<u>10.1145/1066116.1066118</u>.
	9	A. Dunkels et al., 2006. Run-time dynamic linking for reprogramming wireless sensor networks. In proceedings of the 4^th International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys'06, Boulder, Colorado, November 2006), 15--28. DOI=<u>10.1145/1182807.1182810</u>.
	10	E. Ertin et al., 2006. Kansei: A testbed for sensing at scale. In proceedings of the 5^th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN 2006, Nashville, Tennessee, April 2006), 399--406. DOI=<u>10.1145/1127777.1127838</u>.
	11	J. Gehrke and S. Madden, 2004. Query processing in sensor networks. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 3, 1 (January-March 2004), 46--55. DOI=<u>10.1109/MPRV.2004.1269131</u>.
	12	C.-C. Han et al., 2005. A dynamic operating systems for sensor nodes. In proceedings of the 3^rd International Conference on Mobile Systems Applications and Services (MobiSys'05, Seattle, Washington, June 2005), 163--176. DOI=<u>10.1145/1067170.1067188</u>.
	13	J. Hui and D. Culler, 2004. The dynamic behavior of a data dissemination protocol for network programming at scale. In proceedings of the 2^nd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys '04, Baltimore, Maryland, November 2004), 81--94. DOI=<u>10.1145/1031495.1031506</u>.
	14	R. Kumar, E. Kohler and M. Srivastava, 2007. Harbor: Software-based memory protection for sensor nodes. In proceedings of the 6^th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN 2007, Cambridge, Massachusetts, April 2007), 340--348. DOI=<u>10.1145/1236360.1236404</u>.
	15	H. K. Le, D. Henriksson and T. Abdelzaher, 2007. A control theory approach to throughput optimization in multi-channel collection sensor networks. In proceedings of the 6^th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN 2007, Cambridge, Massachusetts, April 2007), 31--40. DOI=<u>10.1145/1236360.1236365</u>.
	16	P. Levis and D. Culler, 2002. Maté: A tiny virtual machine for sensor networks. In proceedings of the 10^th International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS X, San Jose, California, October 2002), 85--95. DOI=<u>10.1145/605397.605407</u>.
	17	P. Levis et al., 2004. The emergence of networking abstractions and techniques in TinyOS. In proceedings of the 1^st Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI'04, San Francisco, California, March 2004), 1--14.
	18	P. Levis et al., 2004. Trickle: A self-regulating algorithm for code propagation and maintenance in wireless sensor network. In proceedings of the 1^st Symposium on Networked Systems design and Implementation (NSDI'04, San Francisco, California, March 2004), 15--28.
	19	H. B. Lim et al., 2007. The national weather sensing grid. In proceedings of the 6^th International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys'07, Cambridge, Massachusetts, April 2007), 369--370. DOI=<u>10.1145/1322263.1322299</u>.
	20	K. Mayer and W. Fritsche, 2006. IP-enabled wireless sensor networks and their integration into the Internet. In proceedings of the 1^st International Conference on Integrated Internet Ad hoc and Sensor Networks (InterSense'06, Nice, France, May 2006). DOI=<u>10.1145/1142680.1142687</u>.
	21	W. P. McCartney and M. Sridhar, 2006. Abstractions for safe concurrent programming in networked embedded systems. In proceedings of the 4^th International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys'06, Boulder, Colorado, November 2006), 167--180. DOI=<u>10.1145/1182807.1182825</u>.
	22	G. Montenegro et al., 2007. Transmission of IPv6 Packets over IEEE 802.15.4 Networks. The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) RFC 4944, September 2007.
	23	S. Nath et al., 2006. SensorMap: A web site for sensors world-wide. In proceedings of the 4^th International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys'06, Boulder, Colorado, November 2006), 373--374. DOI= <u>10.1145/1182807.1182861</u>.
	24	J. Polastre et al., 2005. A unifying link abstraction for wireless sensor networks. In proceedings of the 3^rd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys'05, San Diego, California, November 2005), 76--89. DOI= <u>10.1145/1098918.1098928</u>.
	25	G. J. Pottie and W. J. Kaiser, 2000. Wireless integrated network sensors. Communications of the ACM, 43(5):51--58, (May 2000). DOI=<u>10.1145/332833.332838</u>.
	26	K. Sohrabi et al., 2000. Protocols for self-organization of a wireless sensor networks. IEEE Personal Communications, 7, 5(October 2000), 16--27. DOI=<u>10.1109/98.878532</u>.
	27	E. Trumpler and R. Han, 2006. A systematic framework for evolving TinyOS. In proceedings of the 3^rd Workshop on Embedded Networked Sensors (EmNets 2006, Cambridge, Massachusetts, May 2006).
	28	G. Werner-Allen, P. Swieskowski and M. Welsh, 2005. MoteLab: A wireless sensor network testbed. In proceedings of the 4^th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN'05, Los Angeles, California, April 2005), 483--488. DOI=<u>10.1109/IPSN.2005.1440979</u>.
	29	Y. Yu et al., 2006. Supporting concurrent applications in wireless sensor networks. In proceedings of the 4^th International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys'06, Boulder, Colorado, November 2006), 139--152. DOI=<u>10.1145/1182807.1182822</u>.