| A systematic methodology to use LEGO bricks in web communication design |
| Full text |
Pdf
(3.28 MB)
|
Source
|
ACM Special Interest Group for Design of Communication
archive
Proceedings of the 27th ACM international conference on Design of communication
table of contents
Bloomington, Indiana, USA
SESSION: Web design & development
table of contents
Pages 187-192
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-559-8
|
|
Authors
|
|
Lorenzo Cantoni
|
Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
|
|
Elena Marchiori
|
Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
|
|
Marco Faré
|
Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
|
|
Luca Botturi
|
Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
|
|
Davide Bolchini
|
Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 26, Downloads (12 Months): 26, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
This experience report presents a case study and the lessons learned from using Real Time Web (RTW) in the design of a corporate website. RTW is an innovative methodology to effectively elicit and plastically represent requirements in the design process of a web application. RTW adopts a playful approach to collaboratively elicit requirements and strategic web design issues, and extends the experience of LEGO Serious Play (LSP), a team collaboration methodology. The basic tenet of LSP is that LEGO bricks are simple to use and provide ready-made, powerful and multi-purpose symbolic pieces, known to most people and used in different cultures. RTW exploits this potential to elicit communication requirements, create a share vision for high-level design, and build team commitment.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Beyer, H., and Holtzblatt, K. 1998. Contextual Design. Defining Customer-Centered Systems, Morgan Kaufmann.
|
| |
2
|
Bolchini, D. 2005. Capturing Visions and Goals to Inform Communication Design. In Proc. ACM 23rd International Conference on Design of Communication (SIGDOC 2005), ACM Press, Coventry, September 2005, 131--137.
|
| |
3
|
Botturi, L., and Loh, C. S. 2009. Once Upon a Game: Rediscovering the Roots of Games in Education. In C. T. Miller (ed.), Games: purpose and potential in education, Springer, New York.
|
| |
4
|
Cantoni, L., and Tardini, S. 2006. Internet, Routledge, London.
|
| |
5
|
Gee, J. P. 2003. What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy (2nd ed.), Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
|
| |
6
|
Huizinga, J. 1980. Homo ludens: A study of the play-element in culture (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.), Routledge & Keegan Paul, London.
|
| |
7
|
Koster, R. 2005. A Theory of Fun for Game Design, Paraglyph Press, Scottsdale.
|
| |
8
|
LEGO, LEGO Serious Play, http://www.seriousplay.com/ (retrieved October 19th, 2008).
|
| |
9
|
Sanders, E. B.-N., and Dandavate, U. 1999. Design for experiencing: New tools. In Proceedings of First International Conference on Design and Emotion, Delft, The Netherlands.
|
| |
10
|
Sanders, E. B.-N. 2006. Scaffolds for building everyday creativity. In Jorge Frascara (ed.) Design for Effective Communications: Creating Contexts for Clarity and Meaning, Allworth Press, New York.
|
| |
11
|
Vaajakallio, K., and Mattelmäki, T. 2007. Collaborative Design Exploration: Envisioning Future Practices with Make Tools. In Proceedings of DPPI07. Helsinki, Finland: 223--238.
|
| |
12
|
Ylirisku, S., and Vaajakallio, K. 2007. Situated Make Tools for envisioning ICTs with ageing workers. In Proceedings of Include 2007, Helen Hamlyn Research Center, RCA. http://www.ektakta.com/include_proceedings/ (retrieved February 18th, 2009).
|
|