ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Evaluating the communication design of branded websites: a value-based framework
Full text PdfPdf (1.26 MB)
Source
ACM Special Interest Group for Design of Communication archive
Proceedings of the 27th ACM international conference on Design of communication table of contents
Bloomington, Indiana, USA
SESSION: Web design & analysis table of contents
Pages 73-80  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-559-8
Authors
Davide Bolchini  Indiana University School of Informatics at IUPUI, Indianapolis, IN, USA
Tao Yang  Indiana University School of Informatics at IUPUI, Indianapolis, IN, USA
Franca Garzotto  Politecnico di Milano School of Industrial Design & Dept. of Electronics and Information, Milano, Italy
Sponsors
SIGDOC: ACM Special Interest Group for Design of Communications
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 30,   Downloads (12 Months): 30,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1621995.1622010
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The quality of web communication depends on several factors. One of these, besides usability, is the effectiveness by which the intended brand values are actually conveyed to the users. Leveraging existing research in web branding communication, design and requirements engineering, we propose a systematic framework for evaluating the short-term communication impact of large, information-intensive branded websites. The communication impact is empirically investigated by eliciting and modeling the brand values that the website tries to convey and assessing whether and how much they are perceived by the intended target users. Results from two case studies show that simple and readable indicators can be constructed to identify flaws in the communication of the brand values and support designers and stakeholders to devise precise strategies to improve the design accordingly.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Aaker, D. A. 1991. Managing Brand Equity. NY: Free Press.
 
2
Alben, L. 1996. Quality of Experience: Defining the Criteria for Effective Interaction Design. Interactions. May + June 1996, 12--15.
 
3
Angeli, A. D., Sutcliffe, A., Hartmann, J. 2006. Interaction, Usability and Aesthetics: What Influences Users' Preferences? In Proceedings of 6th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (University Park, PA, USA). 271--280.
 
4
Baird, M., Phau, I. 2008. A Conceptual Analysis of the Effects of Product Prototypicality on Brand Resonance in Brand Extensions. In Proceedings of Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference. (Olympic Park, Sydney: University of Western Sydney). 1--7.
 
5
Bolchini, D., Mylopoulos, J. 2003. From Task-Oriented to Goal-Oriented Web Requirements Analysis. In Proceedings of International Conference of Web Information System Engineering WISE03 (Rome, Italy). 166--175.
 
6
Bolchini, D. 2005. Capturing Visions and Goals to Inform Communication Design. In Proceedings of ACM 23rd International Conference on Design of Communication. (Coventry, Sept. 2005). 131--137.
 
7
Bolchini, D., Garzotto, F., Paolini, P. 2008. Value--Driven Design for "Infosuasive" Web Applications. In Proceedings of the WWW08 Conference. (Beijing, China). 745--754.
 
8
Cockton, G. 2004. From Quality in Use to Value in the World. In CHI 2004 Extended Abstracts. 1287--1290.
 
9
Cockton G. 2005. A Development Framework for Value-Centered Design. In Proceedings of CHI 2005. 1292--1295.
 
10
Cockton, G. 2006. Designing Worth is Worth Design. In Proceedings of NordiCHI. 165--174.
 
11
Delgado, E., Munuera, J. L., Yagüe, M. J. 2003. Development and Validation of a Brand Trust Scale. International Journal of Market Research. 45. 1, 35--54.
 
12
Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H., Howe, D. C. 2000. Trust Online. Communications of the ACM. 43.12, 34--40.
 
13
Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H. 2003. Human Values, Ethics, and Design. In J. A. Jacko and A. Sears (Eds.). The Human Computer Interaction Handbook. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 1177--1201.
 
14
Friedman, B., Kahn, P., Borning, A. 2006. Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems. In Zhang, P & Galletta, D (eds.). Human-Computer Interaction and Management Information Systems: Foundations. New York. 348--372.
 
15
Ha, H., Perks, H. 2005. Effects of Consumer Perceptions of Brand Experience on the Web: Brand Familiarity, Satisfaction and Brand Trust. Journal of Consumer Behavior. 4. 6, 438--452.
 
16
Han, J. H., Mills, J. E. 2006. Zero Acquaintance Benchmarking at Travel Destination Websites: What is the First impression that National Tourism Organizations Try to Make? Int. Journal of Tourism Research. 8, 405--430.
 
17
Hartmann, J., Sutcliffe, A., Angeli, A. D. 2007. Investigating Attractiveness in Web User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. (San Jose, California, USA). 387--396.
 
18
Hornbæk, K., Frøkjær, E. 2008. Making Use of Business Goals in Usability Evaluation: An Experiment with Novice Evaluators. In Proceedings of CHI 2008. 903--912.
 
19
Jansen, B., Zhang, M., Zhang, Y. 2007. The Effect of Brand Awareness on the Evaluation of Search Engine Results. In Proc. CHI 2007 Conference. 2471--2476.
 
20
Kapferer, J. N. 2004. The New Strategic Brand Management: Creating and Sustaining Brand Equity Long Term. Kogan Page, London.
 
21
Keller, K. L. 1993. Conceptualizing Measuring and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity. Journal of Marketing. 57. 1, 1--22.
 
22
Knemeyer, D. 2004. Brand Experience and the Web. Digital Web Magazine. DOI=http://www.digital-web.com/articles/brand_experience_and_the_web.
 
23
Macias, W. 2003. A Preliminary Structural Equation Model of Comprehension and Persuasion of Interactive Advertising Brand Web Sites. Journal of Interactive Advertising. 3. 2.
 
24
Marcus, A. 2004. Branding 101. Interactions. 11. 5, 14--21.
 
25
Müller, B., Chandon, J. 2003. The Impact of Visiting a Brand Website on Brand Personality. Electronic Markets. 13. 3, 210--221.
 
26
Müller, B. 2006. Navigation Experience on a Brand's Website and the Consequences on Brand Image. In The Thought Leaders International Conference on Brand Management.
 
27
Page, C., Lepkowska-White, E. 2002. Web Equity: A Framework for Building Consumer Value in Online Companies. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 19. 3, 231--248.
 
28
Perrone, V., Bolchini, D., Paolini, P. 2005. A Stakeholder-Centered Approach for Conceptual Modeling of Communication-Intensive Applications. In Proc. ACM 23rd Int. Conference on Design of Communication. 25--33.
 
29
Plummer, J. T. 2000. How Personality Makes a Difference. Journal of Advertising Research. 40. 6, 79--83.
 
30
Romaniuk, J., Nicholls, E. 2006. Evaluating Advertising Effects on Brand Perceptions: Incorporating Prior Knowledge. Int. Journal of Market Research. 48. 2, 179--192.
 
31
Slotegraaf, R. J., Pauwels, K. 2008. The Impact of Brand Equity and Innovation on the Long-term Effectiveness of Promotions. Journal of Marketing Research. 45. 3, 293--306.
 
32
Tsygankov, V. A. 2004. Evaluation of Website Trustworthiness from Customer Perspective, a Framework. In Proc. of the 6th international conference on Electronic commerce.