ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Developing heuristics for the semiotics inspection of websites
Full text PdfPdf (746 KB)
Source
ACM Special Interest Group for Design of Communication archive
Proceedings of the 27th ACM international conference on Design of communication table of contents
Bloomington, Indiana, USA
SESSION: Web design & analysis table of contents
Pages 67-72  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-559-8
Authors
Davide Bolchini  Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
Rupa Chatterji  Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
Marco Speroni  YourInterface SA, Lugano, Switzerland
Sponsors
SIGDOC: ACM Special Interest Group for Design of Communications
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 24,   Downloads (12 Months): 24,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1621995.1622009
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The usability of web communication depends on design decisions made along a number of dimensions. These include content, information architecture, navigation, graphics and the design of the interface signs (e.g. labels, command affordances and icons), that we generally call semiotics. Although there is awareness of the importance of the quality of these specific elements to ensure usability, existing usability evaluation methods fail to provide designers with inspection principles to specifically assess the semiotics aspects for web interfaces. This experience report illustrates and discusses the development of an initial set of heuristics and procedural tools aimed at guiding the semiotics inspection of large, information-intensive websites, as a separate concern from the other design dimensions, extensively covered in the usability literature. The semiotics heuristics defined represent a complementary toolkit to the existing usability methods.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Andersen, P.B. (1990). A Theory of Computer Semiotics: Semiotic Approaches to Construction and Assessment of Computer Systems. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
 
2
Brinck, T., Gergle, D., Wood, S. (2002) Usability for the Web: Designing Web Sites that Work. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
 
3
De Souza, C.S.(2005). The Semiotic Engineering of Human Computer Interaction. Cambridge, Mass.:MIT Press.
 
4
De Souza, C. S., Leitão, C. F., Prates, R. O., and da Silva, E. J. 2006. The semiotic inspection method. In Proceedings of VII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Natal, RN, Brazil, November 19 -- 22, 2006). IHC '06, vol. 323. ACM, New York, NY, 148--157.
 
5
Eco, U. (1976): A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press/London: Macmillan
 
6
Kalbach,J. (2007). Designing Web Navigation. Sebastopol,CA: O'Reilly.
 
7
Speroni,M. (2006). Mastering the semiotics of information intensive web interfaces. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Lugano
 
8
Speroni, M., Paolini, P., Bolchini, D. Museum Websites Interface Elements: Do users understand them?, in Proc. Museums&Web Conference 05, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
 
9
Nielsen, J., Mack, R. (1994) Usability Inspection Methods, New York, Wiley and Sons.
 
10
Peirce, Charles Sanders (1931--58): Collected Writings (8 Vols.). (Ed. Charles Hartshorne, Paul Weiss & Arthur W Burks). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
 
11
Spool, J., Perfetti, C., Brittan, D., Designing for the Scent of Information, User Interface Engineering Report (www.uie.com), 2004.