ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Outstanding teachers and ICT
Full text PdfPdf (519 KB)
Source
ACM Special Interest Group for Design of Communication archive
Proceedings of the 27th ACM international conference on Design of communication table of contents
Bloomington, Indiana, USA
SESSION: Teaching & disciplinarity table of contents
Pages 51-58  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-559-8
Authors
Aristidis Protopsaltis  University of Reading , Reading, United Kingdom
Andy Goodwyn  University of Reading , Reading , United Kingdom
Carol L. Fuller  University of Reading , Reading, United Kingdom
Sponsors
SIGDOC: ACM Special Interest Group for Design of Communications
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 16,   Downloads (12 Months): 16,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1621995.1622006
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper presents evidence about expertise in teaching and the use of ICT (Information Communication Technology) to communicate information. Fifty four (54) expert teachers and teaching assistants from infant, primary and secondary schools participated in the study. Participants were nominated by their peers as 'outstanding' in their practice. Semi- structured interviews were conducted, exploring what technology experts have adapted to produce highly effective practice. The current study discusses the results of the demographic data, the technologies expert practitioners use in their teaching and their reasons for using these technologies.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Armstrong, V., et al., "Collaborative research methodology for investigating teaching and learning: the use of interactive whiteboard technology", Educational Review, 57 (4): p. 455--468, 2005.
 
2
Reynard, R., "Expert Teachers: The Risk of Becoming Knowledge Workers", in T.H.E Journal, 2008.
 
3
BECTA, "Harnessing Technology: Next Generation Learning 2008--14": Coventry, 2008.
 
4
Smith, P., P. Rudd, and M. Coghlan, "Harnessing Technology: Schools Survey 2008 Report 1: Analysis", BECTA: Coventry, 2008.
 
5
Moss, G., et al., "The Interactive Whiteboards, Pedagogy and Pupil Performance Evaluation: An Evaluation of the Schools Whiteboard Expansion (SWE) Project: London Challenge", DfES: Nottingham, 2007.
 
6
Smith, A., "Interactive whiteboard evaluation", MirandaNet, 1999.
 
7
Walker, D., "Quality at the dockside", TES Online: p. 66--67, 2003.
 
8
Gerard, F., J. Widener, and M. Greene, "Using SMART Board in foreign language classrooms" in SITE 99: Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, San Antonio, Texas: AACE, 1999.
 
9
Levy, P., "Interactive whiteboards in learning and teaching in two Sheffield schools: a developmental study": Sheffield, 2002.
 
10
Smith, H., "SmartBoard evaluation: final report", Kent NGfL, 2001.
 
11
Bell, M., "Why use an interactive whiteboard? A baker's dozen reasons!" Teachers.Net Gazette, 3 (1): p., 2002.
 
12
OFSTED, "ICT in Schools: The Impact of Government Initiatives: An Interim Report": London, 2001.
 
13
Hennessy, S., K. Ruthven, and B. Brindley, "Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: commitment, constraints, caution, and change", Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37 (2): p. 155--192., 2005.
 
14
Prensky, M., "How to tech with technology: keeping both teachers and students comfortable in an era of exponential change", in Emerging Technologies for Learning (volume 2), Becta: Coventry, 2007.
 
15
Goodwyn, A. and K. Findlay, "Literacies and ICT", BECTA: Coventry, 2003.
 
16
Cox, M., et al., "ICT and pedagogy: A review of the research literature", in ICT in Schools Research and Evaluation Series -- No.18, Becta for the Department for Education and Skills: London, 2003.
 
17
Weiss, D.J. and J. Shanteau, "Empirical assessment of expertise", Human Factors, 45: p. 104--116, 2003.
 
18
Shanteau, J., et al., "How can you tell if someone is an expert? Performance-based assessment of expertise", in Emerging perspectives on judgment and decision research, S.L. Schneider and J. Shanteau, Editors, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. p. 620--639, 2003.
 
19
Kennewell, S., "Interactive whiteboards -- yet another solution looking for a problem to solve?" Information Technology in Teacher Education, 39: p. 3--6, 2001.
 
20
Knight, P., J. Pennant, and J. Piggott, "What does it mean to use the interactive whiteboard in the daily mathematics lesson?" MicroMath, 20 (2): p. 14--16, 2004.
 
21
Glover, D. and D. Miller, "Running with technology: the pedagogic impact of the large-scale introduction of interactive whiteboards in one secondary school", Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10 (3): p. 257--276, 2001.
 
22
BECTA, "Getting the most from your interactive whiteboard: a guide for secondary schools": Coventry, 2004.
 
23
BECTA, "Harnessing Technology Review 2008: The role of technology and its impact on education", BECTA, 2008.
 
24
Shanteau, J., D., et al., "How can you tell if someone is an expert? Performance-based assessment of expertise", in Emerging perspectives on judgment and decision research, S.L. Schneider and J. Shanteau, Editors, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. p. 620--639, 2003.